what s the most curious part about maggie s phone? what s most curious about it is alex has her password. if he is wanting to change the time line when he calls her phone, he should answer her phone. when he texts her, he should reply to that text to show activity on her phone that she s still alive. if he is manufacturing a time line by speeding, the easiest way to do it is use both phones. talk on both phones. he didn t.
and what if sources dangerous drug gang. i object. those were plausible scenarios they were throwing out to you and that you can think up many equally plausible scenarios. but you have to decide the evidence based on the facts that the state puts before you. not theories, not inferences, not speculation, but cold-hard facts. mr. waters also said that alex, the master liar, accused shelly smith, blanca and perhaps another witness of lying. he never did such a thing. he never accused anybody of lying from this witness stand. now, i ve been around long enough to know, long enough to know that witnesses can
because we point stuff out like that, we re not saying they re lying. now, with shelly and the blue tarp, she remembers something, we re not sure what. but the evidence clearly is she says it was on wednesday june 16th. and we got the fbi cell phone forensics, we got records and we got testimony that alex is in summerville, he spent the night with his in-laws, on tuesday, and he stayed there toward the end of the week and then went to the mountains. so alex could not have been knocking on the door of the alameda house on the morning of june 16th. and told you she relieves shelly, she works all night and she leaves and works at the school district. barbara ann comes in and relieves shelly.
person has maggie s phone and stops the call? something is going on with her phone at 9:04, i will tell you that. at 9:04, the next is missed call from alex ends. 9:05, backlight on. 9:06, orientation changes to portrait. 9:07, incoming call from alex excuse me, 9:06. keep going. keep going. and then at 9:07, her phone stops for good. one of the things that you heard
0 fraud he had been committing for years, the defense pointing out that doesn t make any sense, all that did was landed him in law enforcement s focus. so, what we see here is the defense trying to eat away at the prosecution s case. they did that earlier by attacking forensic evidence. they spent a lot of time talking about blood splatter evidence and why that might not be a reliable indicator of guilt. and while the prosecution has the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution, in essence, has to convince the jury on each of these points. the defense only has to make that one small inroad, that s their strategy here here. joyce vance, thank you so much. that does it for me this hour. i ll be back tomorrow. jose diaz-balart reports starts right now. and good morning. 11:00 a.m. eastern, 8:00 a.m. pacific, i m jose diaz-balart. we re keeping our eyes on south carolina courtroom where former attorney alex murdaugh stands trial for the murder of his wife maggie and