this point? is it about russian laundering, steve bannon seems to independents kaindicate. what would you say? what happens in terms of what the russians did and how do we prevent it from happening in the future as well as what did that effort, vening in our election, include ka collusion or collaboration with any particular campaign? what we ve seen we know they intervened. we know they used social media in a way unprecedented and seen those companies take action. we know we have to better guard our electoral systems and will have more recommendations there and we know there have been a host of contacts from the russians to officials in the trump campaign. many of those contacts were not related to the fbi. we know that a former british secret service agent, chris steele, showed this evidence as well. and we ve got to decide where
with him without condition or would you demand that a strict set of parameters be placed around any encounter between you and the special counsel? again, john, there has been no collusion between the trump campaign and russians, or trump and russians. no collusion. i ve been in office now for 11 months. for 11 months they ve had this phony cloud over this administration, over our government. it s a democrat hoax that was brought up as an excuse for losing an election. so we ll see what happens. again, would you be open we ll see what happens. certainly i ll see what happens, but when they have no collusion and nobody s found any collusion at any level, it seems unlikely that you d even have an interview. all right. so what is that supposed to mean? you might have guessed from that answer or non-answer, the president put up a bit of a smoke screen which he kept igniting. when you talk about interviews, hillary clinton had an interview where she wasn t
sworn in. she wasn t given the oath. they didn t take notes. they didn t record. and it was done on the fourth of july weekend. there is collusion, but it s really with the democrats and the russians, far more than it is with the republicans and the russians. so the witch-hunt continues. folks, the president throughout many questionable claims than just those first two clips. first off, the ish a you whether or not there was russia ka collusion is still a very open question. don t forget, don junior meeting with them alone merricks that an open question. two of the advisers plet guid g about lying. two indicted. and his son met with russians. one of his own campaign advisers knowledge of russian dirt apparently triggered the fbi to open an investigation in the first place. to call it a democratic hoax is obviously quite the stretch. claims about the fbi s interview