evening, saying it s not going to be okay, that things are really bad behind the scenes. what do you make of that? i mean, omarosa is omarosa. she obviously got on the president s radar by being on the presideshow and john kelly clear she finally had to go. reince priebus disliked her, thought it was a joke she was in the white house at all, wasn t able to get rid of her because of her previous relationship with the president. she s someone who s been a hanger-on for years. she has the ability to do real damage. no one in the white house was exactly clear what she was doing all day when she came to work. but she was in meetings that she wanted to walk into. they tried to keep her out of them. she could cause damage from the outside. the advice you would give if they were listening to a former clinton staff secretary is what? i think it s a serious position with a lot of responsibility and it deserves a lot of attention in terms of how
let s be clear, the hanger on, the former campaign chairman of the trump administration and the sun of donald trump, donald trump, jr., and a son in meetings as well. look, i know vladimir putin said that he didn t get involved in the presidential election, and donald trump believes him, but frankly, nobody else does. the cia believes that there was major interference. we do not know beyond a shadow of a doubt if there was collusion. there certainly is enough evidence, evidence that members of the trump campaign knew about leaks of emails before it happened. we know that is not true. what you just said, we know is not true, and that story has been recanted by cnn. you re confusing two different pieces. do we think that russia had attempted to influence our election, yes, we know that. to be think that the trump organization had anything to do with it? no, zero evidence to suggest
information on the russia probe relating to two campaign advisers. one described as the coffee boy and another dubbed a hanger on. we start with carter page, who met with the white house intelligence committee yesterday. the new york times reports tonight carter page, a foreign policy adviser to the trump presidential campaign, met russian government officials during a july 2016 trip he took to moscow, according to testimony he gave on thursday to the house intelligence committee. shortly after that trip mr. page sent an e-mail to at least one trump campaign aide describing insights he had after conversations with government officials, legislators and business executives during his time in moscow. according to one person familiar with the contents of the message. the e-mail was read aloud during the closed door testimony. in march page talked to msnbc s chris hayes about his trip, saying some people said hello to him there. you went to russia in the summer of 2016. yes. you gav
williams. day 288 of the trump administration brings us new information on the russia probe relating to two campaign advisers. one described as the coffee boy and another dubbed a hanger on. we start with carter page, who met with the white house intelligence committee yesterday. the new york times reports tonight carter page, a foreign policy adviser to the trump presidential campaign, met russian government officials during a july 2016 trip he took to moscow, according to testimony he gave on thursday to the house intelligence committee. shortly after that trip mr. page sent an e-mail to at least one trump campaign aide describing insights he had after conversations with government officials, legislators and business executives during his time in moscow. according to one person familiar with the contents of the message. the e-mail was read aloud during the closed door testimony. in march page talked to msnbc s chris hayes about his trip, saying some people said hello to
before the public did. that s what bob mueller s team is looking at. nothing may come from it. there may be no collusion. kennedy: there is also a lot of information on the email that clinton tried to withhold that the state department was more concerned over. information is information. if are going to go after george papadopoulos for lying to the fbi, that s understandable. we got supposed to do that. any rational adult knows that. you can t do that. so john podesta went before the senate intelligence committee and said that he had no idea how the dossier was funded while mark elias was sitting next to him. was he lying? [all talking at once] gillian: the key question is what was his role on the campaign? there has to be a ground truth somewhere. was he a hanger on, volunteer, or was he a foreign policy advisor? someone needs to be able to answer that question. kennedy: there were russian missives that were caught up in