Washington. You have heard other stories sort of like this along these lines in recent days. You have never before heard what we are going to report tonight. That is coming up this hour. This is something that we have been chasing for months. We have finally nailed it down with multiple sources. Weve got that for you in just a moment. We are also going to speak in just a moment exclusively with senator chuck schumer, who, of course, is the top democrat in the United States senate. He is at the center of the brawl over filling the seat on the u. S. Supreme court that has now been left open by the death of Justice Ruth Bader ginsburg. This interview with me tonight will be senator schumers first interview since Justice Ginsburgs death. We are also following a slew of latebreaking news tonight. Some of it quite dramatic, including the news that cindy mccain, the widow of republican senator and republican president ial candidate john mccain, cindy mccain is endorsing joe biden for presiden
Funding. Mr. Kaplan, very quickly if you can add to that. My simple answer is that partnership, Publicprivate Partnership has been very successful and, therefore, in my mind we should invest in debt and make it better as opposed to cutting it back. Thank you so much. Thank you to all of you, and thank you to the chairman. I went over my time, so thank you for allowing me to do so. The chair thanks the gentleman appeared that concludes our first round of question. We will go to one followup per site. And dr. Burgess, wel we will bn with five minutes of followup. Dr. Holtzeakin, i want to follow up on the stuff we were talking about earlier in that first round. It appears in washington today there is a crisis in common. The president has sold the Affordable Care act on just a raft of false premises. You can keep your plan. False. You can keep your doctor. Faults. These are broken promises and these in fact are the opportunity cost that americans are paying for the Affordable Care act. Th
Almost exactly to a t the instructions that isis has put out in its social Media Channels before with instructions to their followers on how to carry out such an attack. Paul judge Michael Mukasey served as the 81st attorney general of the United States, and he also presided over the criminal prosecution of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing suspects. Judge, good to have you here again. Good to be here. Paul you heard john miller. This is the kind of nightmare scenario for people who are trying to prevent this. Somebody selfradicalizedded here, very hard to stop. Well, selfradicalized is one of those phrases that, frankly, id like to bury because he didnt invent the doctrine, he didnt create the videos, the support system and Everything Else that goes with it. He was alone, in a sense, but somebody who had passed through the radar before. Paul what i mean by that is there is not links that would have shown him to have popped up on the screen where the fbi or nypd could say, aha, hes s
Legal team were able to get the charges dismissed based on the fact that the evidence in the case was improperly seized from his washington apartment. That was not the end of it. Not by a long shot. Five years later george nader was indicted again on similar charges after he was caught with child pornography. This time not in his apartment, but in his luggage in the d. C. Area. George nader was convicted in that case and served time on those child porn charges. That also was not the end of it. Five years after that ten years after that in 2000, prosecutors say george nader trafficked a child for sex into the United States. He brought a 14yearold boy to the United States from europe for the purpose of sexually abusing the boy. Prosecutors say he did that in 2000 and they say they have evidence to prove it. More on that later on. Three years after that incident in 2003 he was convicted in the Czech Republic of abusing multiple underage boys. Its unclear what his sentence may have been, b
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
It is the policy of my Administration to make evidence-based decisions guided by the best available science and data. Scientific and technological information, data, and evidence are central to the development and iterative improvement of sound policies, and to the delivery of equitable programs, across every area of government. Scientific findings should never be distorted or influenced by political considerations. When scientific or technological information is considered in policy decisions, it should be subjected to well-established scientific processes, including peer review where feasible and appropriate, with appropriate protections for privacy. Improper political interference in the work of Federal scientists or other scientists who support the work of the Federal Government and in the communication of scientific facts undermines the welfare of the Nation, contributes to systemic inequities and injustice