Out with the meet and confer, and if we could have this at our next meeting, which would be our last chance, really, to have a vote, get four votes and put it on the ballot for june, i think thats something we really should try our best at doing. Thats my opinion. Commissioner renne . Well, as i understand what staff is asking us first, because we originally had a 2016 version, which is the one we sent to the board. After their meetings, they made some revisions, and theyre now proposing the 2017 version which they want us to use yes, thats the one we want to go forward with or, no, we want to go with 2016. I understand that. So the first vote but ive got some questions. I understand that, but my point is whichever one we decide, whether its the 2016 one or 2017 one, lets move it to get it on the ballot. Absolutely. But i have a couple of questions about the meet and confer. Suppose you meet and confer and the agency says we dont like this, or we want that, and we dont agree to what th
Thank you. Good evening, commissioners from Pacific Islander berry want to make a few comments on the property ballot for the regulation of expenditure lobbyists as ive testified month lobbying is accomplished through the compensation of people to lobby city officials dribble the category was deleted from the law in 2010 because in part very few entities qualified since it appears that you have decided to move forward with adding back the expenditure lobbyists category to the ordinance i would like to thank commissioner renne and city stiff tar stimuli simplifying the definition of city lobbyist it provide for clarity over the previous versions and is consistent with the terminal in the lobbying laws i want to bring your attention one matter not previous discussion since the term expenditure lobbyists will apply inform any person pa makes payment of 2,500 to urge others to lobby the city officers this law my a apply to vendors of major projection in San Francisco that may file 5 report
Telephone it refers to the corporations the name of each officer of that corporation that could be a lot so lets say youre a tier one bang have offices all over the gloib want to put two atms under the district you have to file or do a get a conditional use permit having meetings and getting people involved and engaged im not sure it is necessary to have all 2 thousand offices to be submitted to the Ethics Commission unless youre the head of Human Resources to be listed theres probably a way to russet that so we know who you are going after this is going to the comments by commissioner hur that plain clothes say you dont want all 2 thesis officers at a bank to go be filed under the initial draft any less closer gloss hurdle it is important to get this done right the first time and ill ask you review that one portion a comment on the airbnb i know there are a lot of the commercials im an attorney but the commercials as played will not be included or covered by this legislation and. What
From Pacific Islander berry want to make a few comments on the property ballot for the regulation of expenditure lobbyists as ive testified month lobbying is accomplished through the compensation of people to lobby city officials dribble the category was deleted from the law in 2010 because in part very few entities qualified since it appears that you have decided to move forward with adding back the expenditure lobbyists category to the ordinance i would like to thank commissioner renne and city stiff tar stimuli simplifying the definition of city lobbyist it provide for clarity over the previous versions and is consistent with the terminal in the lobbying laws i want to bring your attention one matter not previous discussion since the term expenditure lobbyists will apply inform any person pa makes payment of 2,500 to urge others to lobby the city officers this law my a apply to vendors of major projection in San Francisco that may file 5 reports with the notification approve or disa
Through the compensation of people to lobby city officials dribble the category was deleted from the law in 2010 because in part very few entities qualified since it appears that you have decided to move forward with adding back the expenditure lobbyists category to the ordinance i would like to thank commissioner renne and city stiff tar stimuli simplifying the definition of city lobbyist it provide for clarity over the previous versions and is consistent with the terminal in the lobbying laws i want to bring your attention one matter not previous discussion since the term expenditure lobbyists will apply inform any person pa makes payment of 2,500 to urge others to lobby the city officers this law my a apply to vendors of major projection in San Francisco that may file 5 reports with the notification approve or disapprove under the developer disclosures law a major project as a real estate project in San Francisco where the Planning Commission or other lead agencies are certified an