Provided and into the record to the conclusion of the hearing. I recognize myself for 5 minutes for Opening Statements. Let me find my Opening Statement here. I believe this hearing is long overdue. Suffering terrible inequalities. Unreliable access to the energy grid, little or no broadband connectivity, and reliable funds for the federal government and other systematic problems that created unnecessary hardship and turmoil and covid19 is exacerbating these long existing problems. One third of tribal members are at high risk of serious covid19 complications due to Underlying Health factors and Navajo Nation has seen higher infection rates than those in china at the peak of the pandemic. Despite this stark reality the impact of covid19 on tribal communities, weve seen the struggles of tribal communities and access to personal protective equipment and testing to protect against covid19. Is this pandemic redesign and covid19 cases continue to rise in many areas of the Country Access to p
This is for an argument in the case of versus truck. Nice to see you again. Thank you. Thomas byron on behalf of the government defend it with is ecker for the department of Defense Office of general counsel. This case is about an internal transfer of funds among deities accounts. In the internal transfer itself, didnt harm plaintiffs in fact they contend otherwise for the content that their interests will harmed by the subsequent downstream use of those funds for construction of border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the appropriations act. In that provision was not designed to protect the kind of interest that the plaintiffs here assert against quote recreational a set environmental that they face. This zone of interest requirement which is the universal requirement, so weather they are seeking a review of the ata or on an equitable overviews, claim, and applies in any event and it asked this quote to determine whether those kinds of inter
Club versus trump. Proceed. Nice to see you again. Thank you, chief judge thomas. May it please the court on behalf of the defendants. With me is karen hekker from the department of defense, general counsel. This case is about an internal transfer of funds among dods accounts and the internal transfer itself didnt harm plaintiffs, in fact, they dont contend otherwise, they contend that their interests were harmed by the subsequent downstream use of funds from the construction at border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the dod precipitations act, and that provision was not designed to protect the kinds of interest that the plaintiffs here assert, the kinds of recreational aesthetic and Environmental Concerns that theyve raised. The zone of interest requirement, which is a universal requirement, whether theyve whether theyre seeking refew under the apa or under an equitable it applies in any event and asks the court to determine whether those k
The time is set for argument in the case of sierra club versus trump. Take your seat. Nice to see you again. Thank you chief justice smith. Thomas byron from the department of justice on behalf of the government defended. With me is karen hecker office of general counsel. This case is about an internal transfer assignment among the ods accounts and the internal defense for itself didnt harm plaintiffs, they dont contend otherwise. They contend their interests were harmed by the subsequent downstream use of these funds for construction of border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the dod operations act and that provision was not designed to protect the kind of interests the plaintiffs assert, the kinds of recreational aesthetic and Environmental Concerns theyve raised. The requirements which is a universal requirement, whether theyre seeking review under the apa or under an equitable ultra viris claim, applies in any event and it asks this court
Parties requested in denied expedited hearing for this case before the us court of appeals for the ninth circuit. Following the Supreme Court order allowing the administration to temporarily begin construction using the funds. The time is set for argumentin the case of sierra clubversus trunk. Take your seat. Nice to see you again. Thank you chief justice smith. Thomas byron from the department of justice on behalf of the government defended. With me is karen hecker office of general counsel riyadh this case is about an internal transfer assignment among the ods accounts and the internal defense for itself didnt harm plaintiffs, they dont contend otherwise. They contend their interests were harmed by the subsequent downstream use of these funds for construction of border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the dod operations act and that provision was not designed to protect the kind of interests the plaintiffs assert, the kinds of recreational