away from here, about a 15 minute drive. typically that s a process that includes fingerprinting. that includes mug shots. a spokesperson confirms that to me. of course it s not clear whether that would happen here. there are a number of factors that go into this. certainly the sheriff has said that he plans to treat this just like he would any other booking unless he is told differently. but we know the presiding judge has a say. we know that it s possible defense attorneys could work out or negotiate the terms with the d.a., and then also there s the presence of the secret service in all of this. when you talk about the former president, right? our colleague kelly o donnell is reporting that the secret service has been kind of surveying fulton county doing sort of walk-throughs even before the indictment was handed up. so they re already getting eyes on what a potential surrender could look like from a safety perspective. now, when we talk about the arraignment and the surrender, it
tuohys family, who i m grateful for for letting me stay my senior year there, but you have to understand and i was an all american football player before i moved in with them. do you want to stay here, michael? reporter: as the film depicts, oher describes in court documents how he was on his own in high school and nearly penny also. he says in 2004, before his senior year, the tuohys invited him to live with them, eventually discussing adoption. oher claims he was tricked into signing documents he believed were a necessary step in the adoption process. but just six months ago, he says he learned he was never adopted, and instead sean and leigh anne tuohy became his conservators. the conservatorship was a way to secure oher s ncaa eligibility to play college football, saying lawyers advised we couldn t adopt over the age of 18. the only thing we could do was to have a conservatorship. oher claims constituties used
as saying even as president trump would not keep his public comments about pending cases within proper limits. so it s something that it seems he just doesn t like to play by the rules, but do you think it has an impact on potential jury pool or witnesses? i think it s possible that it has an impact on jury pool. witnesses probably less so, but i think judge chutkan is really going to be asking herself to what extent do his attacks on me affect the process. if the answer is, no, it s just designed to is intimidate me and i m not a person easily intimidated she s more likely to let it go. and we might not see her go from 0 to 180 but rather through a series of incremental steps warn the defendant and his lawyers again and again. that having been said, she was unambiguous last friday. her obligation is to the integrity of the process, even if that means that donald trump s free speech rights are more constrained than he thinks