What happens when two of the funniest people on earth join us in studio 1a . Youre about to find out because amy poehler and jim carrey are here, today, tuesday, october 28th, 2014. Announcer from nbc news, this is today with matt lauer and savannah guthrie, live from studio 1a in rockefeller plaza. And good morning. Welcome to today on a tuesday morning. Im matt lauer, along with hoda kotb, al roker and josh elliott. Who . Hey, now well have more on that in a second. Savannah continues on Maternity Leave with baby vale. We have amy poehler and jim carrey. All im going to say is last time he was here, i rode him like a pony. And that wasnt even on the show. Absolutely. Your turn, young man. I brought my own saddle. A man out taking a walk in midtown predawn and sees the lights, next thing you know, here i am. Good to have you here. The mounting questions and concerns over what to do with people returning from the front lines of the fight against ebola. This, in the wake of the controve
Shaw look for these titles in bookstores and watch for the authors on booktv and on booktv. Org. Booktv continues with robert spoo. He talks about the clash between literary pirates over copyrights going back to 1790 and discusses how it has shaped the copyright laws that we have today and this is about one hour. [applause] thank you so much. As the dean indicated, most of us and a large number of legal scholars, you might be surprised to learn that an area that is not compelled by law, something that is informal but very organized, and it has grown up to fill the various needs and the various cracks in the wall of law and i am going to be talking about one of those major cracks in the law today and i will be focused on the 19th century in the United States and particularly on authors and publishers in america, really from the 1820s and 30s amah up to lease the end of the century where, as you will see, the world is really kind of turned upside down where publishing is concerned. Lawfu
Existing building line. That you can probably see from the [speaker not understood] were counting from the back, not the stairway. And the second one is to set the addition off the maam, your time is up. Eight feet off the proline [speaker not understood]. Thank you. Thank you. ~ second dr requestor. Good afternoon, commissioners. My name is michael zucker. My wife and i are the owners of the property immediately to the north of the subject property that were discussing this afternoon. Our family has lived in this house since 2002. We have thoroughly enjoyed the neighborhood. It is a unique part of the city where we have side yards as well as rear yards and we have a continuity of development in this particular midblock area. I wish to address three things this afternoon. I want to talk about the neighborhood, the project, and our goals for today. In this neighborhood theres a clearly defined pattern of at the rear of all of the yards. I brought this aerial photograph which i believe y
Creating a pattern of spacing and design on the block base. The subject property and the adjacent property to the south each contain garage structures in their rear yards accessible through a shared driveway. Since the commission packets went out last week, the department received two emails and one phone call from neighbors in support of the project. And ill pass copies of the emails for the commissions review. Okay. First dr requestor. Oh, im sorry. The dr requestors are the immediate adjacent Property Owners to the south and north. [speaker not understood] is a resident of 137 17th avenue. The property to the south. And [speaker not understood] is the owner of 129 17th avenue, the property to the north. Ms. Setos concerns include the following. That the project is incompatible with surrounding buildings with respect to depth and negatively affects the midblock open space. That the projects form is incompatible with her building with respect to the shared driveway. That the project n
The dr requestors. When i spoke to mr. Zucker a couple weeks ago, we provided a detailed elevation facing him so he could understand what it was we were proposing, but it really came down to whether we were willing to agree to reduce our extension to the rear. And we need to extend to the rear if this is going to be a feasible project. It really just doesnt make sense for this family if we cant get that family room. Thank you very much. Thank you. Is there public testimony from supporters of the project . The other mic. Im susan mcdonough. Im an owner at 133 17th avenue. And i would like the commission to approve this project so that i can increase the Square Footage for my family. I have an 11 year old son and a 9 Year Old Girl and id like to add a second bathroom and would like to add a family room in the back of the house. We had a preapproval meeting which neither neighbor attended. Mr. Zucker followed up in email form. [speaker not understood] never contacted us directly. Eventual