constant police supervision. the mayor s plan at a cost of a million u.s. dollars seems like a tiny amount aimes to address the thousands of complaints. he argues that long-term harassment leaves upstanding citizens to be driven out and not their nuisance neighbors that makes sense. this is the world turned upside down he says. a team of harassment directors has also been appointed to gather reports of these do error rum detractors. for more let s go to amsterdam. do you know what that was? it was something beautiful. they call it scum village. i am thinking that is not a big selling point.
international red cross. because we want to send a message that we love that country. we love the people and we want to help them. we re also trying to help from our u.s. stand point and our japanese office toss help these people there. so we ll be very involved and we believe as a country that has enormous potential in terms of from a business perspective, and right now, we re just concentrating on the needs that they have and we re so sorry about this tragic event that took place in the lives of the japanese. all right, thank you very much. and that s dan of aflac, and about a hundred million yen and a million u.s. dollars. and we want to keep you on top of these nuclear facilities of where there were fears of a meltdown, implosion, that sort of thing and put it into perspective. the idea is to keep these quite literally, schools and restored, that s when you have
against me personally, if what he is saying is true, then he must be the victim of the most sustained campaign of malicious libel that has ever been inflicted on any individual in history. that s what he s saying he is. well, you know, he has a remedy, doesn t he? but the reason he doesn t take this remedy, in fact he tried to take this remedy once before when the doctors medical protection society was funding him to sue me. sue the television company. sue the sunday times. and what happened at the end? he discontinued his action and he sent me a check. i actually received a check from his lawyers to pay my legal costs. dr. wakefield has a remedy. the trouble is he can t take that remedy because he s a fraudster. after all these years he s finally been nailed. we ve been able to over the years produce the evidence that he was being paid by lawyers, we were able to show that he received three quarters of a million u.s. dollars. next week we re going to itemize in the bmj his busines
against me personally, if what he is saying is true, then he must be the victim of the most sustained campaign of malicious libel that has ever been inflicted on any individual in history. that s what he s saying he is. well, you know, he has a remedy, doesn t he? but the reason he doesn t take this remedy, in fact he tried to take this remedy once before when the doctors medical protection society was funding him to sue me. sue the television company. sue the sunday times. and what happened at the end? he discontinued his action and he sent me a check. i actually received a check from his lawyers to pay my legal costs. dr. wakefield has a remedy. the trouble is he can t take that remedy because he s a fraudster. after all these years he s finally been nailed. we ve been able to over the years produce the evidence that he was being paid by lawyers, we were able to show that he received three quarters of a million u.s. dollars. next week we re going to itemize in the bmj his busines
three never had autism at all. so, why would a doctor fake study on such an important issue? money is a reason, according to the journalist who investigated for bmj. i believe that his motivation was essentially to make money, initially to make money from litigation. he was retained as an expert in a lawsuit for which we know he was paid three quarters of a million u.s. dollars, but he had all kinds of business interests which he thought would make considerably more money through promoting the scare and promoting public anxiety over the mmr vaccine. wakefield s response? he calls deer a hitman, out to get him. wakefield defends his study from 1998. the claims to whether the vaccine caused their children harm or not came from the parents, not me. i didn t have a preconceived notion about this at all. i haven t heard of autism since medical school. this was a clinical examination