just because democracy didn t produce the results they wanted . they still plan to change the suburbs forever by getting rid of them. joe biden s hud secretary, marcia fudge, a former member of congress explained last year the administration was concerned that african americans cannot afford homes not because they re poor, but because home appraisers are racist watch. what the president has said, is that we have to look at everything through a lens of equity. and so what? we have realizes that people selling homes that just as the person you were talking about, and even people buying homes if their appraisal is not correct, what we find especially as a black people in communities of color and underserved communities is we lose great wealth just through the appraisal process. notice here the seizing of the moral high ground big picture. if the party ministration got about african americans they probably wouldn t withdrawal the police were american but in point of fact, for
,you will remember, lecturinguiy the rest of us about equity, meaning that straight white men are bad. and yet, strangelyy th, the perl he chose for this job was not ws a member of a racial or minority. guinority. privileged straight white guy.y he was called nick mcquaid. nick mcquaid went to private schools. he wrote at wesleyan. he w went to columbia for law school. he is definitely not oppressed. but that did not mattemar to joe biden. some jobs are too important for affirmative action. liquid ertives main qualificn was being the former law l partner of hunter biden aws criminal attorney in december criminal attorney in december a latham and watkins lawyer called chris clark to defend him againslaar t potential federaljust a tax charges. just a month later, hunter biden s dad hired chris clark s partner, nick mcquaid, to oversee the agency that could bring those federal tahex charges. that seems like an obviousglr and glaring conflict, buint no, nick mcquaid did not
many similar movements that arae on the way. inevitably, and the few visionaries who have grasped this obvious truth weirdly , have not been welcomed by blue am america. they have been mockeda, they and derided as prophets, always are. a fewfe years ago, foro, example, a blue blond woman from montana called rachel dolezal declared that she wanas black because she decided that she was black . blackness was rachel dolezald lived experience, but she was not greeted as liberators. t gr she was almost immediateh booed off the stage and then she disappearee d and tellingly, none of the people yelling atye rachel dolezal ever explained whdy she couldn t be black. why not?t? in this country, you can change your , but not your race. really, how does that work? what species of science are weec talking about here? it was note are we defensible al and so over time, like alle ar indefensible arguments, it will collapse someday. the new york times will give g rachel dough s all its
advertisers? anyone who do that is obviously pablo escobar level corrupt and should not be trusted. what would that look like? that level of corruption? well, imagine that the trump administration had made it mandatory for american citizens to buy mypillow. that s when fox news s biggest advertisers imagined. the administration declared that if you didn t rush out and buy at least one , mypillow and then at least another booster pillow, you may not be allowed to eat out. you couldn t reenter your own country. you couldn t have a paying job. mypillow, they told you with a straight face, was the very lynchpin of our country s public health system. now, imagine if they told you that that fox, as your news organization endorsed it, amplified the government s message. imagine if fox news attacked anyone who refused to buy mypillow as an ally of russia, as an enemy of science. and then imagine that fox kept up those libelous attacks even as evidence mounted that mypillow ca
the republican frontrunner for poesident arrested by a democratic prosecutor on political grounds. nothing like that has evercal happened. and we wanted to hear fromanence the man who experienced it. the conversationd and a lot of different directions, heavily on foreign policy. an amazing, really an amazing conversation. here s how it began. you mr. president , thank you for having us . thank you. having n thanklast week you re n new york for this arraignment. the world watched it.raig you ve notnment, given an intert since you were there, i think. fifty seven minutes. tell from your perspective what that was like. well, it was a horrible thing i? because i did nothing wrong.e tn absolutely nothing like you look at evene the pundits, the legal analysis, greg jarrett, all os f theslegae reay talented people, they re saying he didn t do anything wrong. soo anythiwrong. that s number i number two , they werenc incredible when i went to theon courthouse, which is also a prison i