unfairly and being politically persecuted. he said the big thing is not just the valuations of the building, which you can argue are subjective to a degree, the actually square footage of trump tower in particular, which is a math issue. it s not subjective. either the ruler says it or doesn t. trump tower was stated as a 30,000 square foot penthouse. his condo. his condo in these valuations. it s 10,000 square feet. they call it a triple, they multiply it by three. if you believe that, i have a bridge to sell you. this is insane. he knew exactly what he was doing. but the ag doesn t even have to prove intent. the standard under 6312 that new york court have had for decades and decades is whether or not it has a tendency to mislead. that s the bar they have to
related to, the martin act, which has been around for a hundred years. this is not new law. the notion that you have to have a victim, no, donald trump is making things up as you go along. at the end of the day, the victim is the people. the plaintiff in any case like this is the people of the state of new york, and about protecting the marketplace, and saying you can t just lie and make things up in business this this state. the trump university case ended up with the end of trump university as you well know. could this case end up with the end of the trump organization here in new york state? as we know it, yes. absolutely. what does that mean? executive 6312 contains a provision we have been talking about that allows for the cancellation of corporate charters when there s been consistent and repeated frau. that looks like the case here. certainly something the ag is pursuing and something judge engoron ruled on, we re going to cancel the corporate charters for the businesses
licenses making their lives much more difficult? it’s licenses making their lives much more difficult? more difficult? it s very difficult to sa . more difficult? it s very difficult to say- our more difficult? it s very difficult to say. our government - more difficult? it s very difficult to say. our government is - more difficult? it s very difficult. to say. our government is asking more difficult? it s very difficult - to say. our government is asking for proof that they were fishing in the six 12 mile zone but because of the size of the vessels that they they were not my regulations did not have to have monitoring systems that they can t prove where they were so it s a bit of a tough situation and our government has issued the licenses that can prove they were there and the vessels that can t prove they were there have not been issued licenses so we have not been able to see what evidence that the french have shown to try to get these licenses but am sure the government has