trump has been involved in an astronomical amount of lawsuits. usa today counted 4,095 and that was before he was elected president. they range from suits against the network univision for saying it would not air trump s miss universe pageants after his comments about mexicans being racists to suing his ex-wife ivana for talking too much for details relating to his finances. he even sued the country of scotland for building an offshore wind farm next to one of his hotels. but today, donald trump s weird obsession with lawsuits finally backfired. the former president was hit with a fine of almost $1 million for a lawsuit he filed against hillary clinton, alleging that she along with the democratic national committee orchestrated a malicious conspiracy to investigate his campaign s ties to russia and rigging the election in clinton s favor, even though he literally won that election. it s safe to assume that trump was hoping for southern district of florida judge aileen cannon to overs
voters who went to the polls to vote on election day. we talked about how election day voters are more republican friendly crypt in early speaking. so there s a possibility there that in that few thousand that remain and up-to-date votes there s still a possibility for republican success. not so much in terms of the outcome of the governors, race but you mentioned it. i think that looms large what i m describing right here in the race for attorney general where the margin for the democrats is 4100, basically 4095. the uncertainty i m describing around how the provisionals will break about how those remaining same-day votes will break in maricopa county, about the scattering of votes from these various counties around the state, scattering types of votes from these counties around the state exactly how that will break as well, i think is going to determined s attorney generals raise where hamadeh is still in. he is within striking distance
4095, that is how many lawsuits former president donald trump or his organization, has been involved in, according to usa today. and they cover everything from defamation, contract disputes, personal injury, and more. and they spanned three decades. donald trump has been the defendant in almost 2000 of those civil suits. but the former president has never been a defendant in a criminal trial. if that changes, the trump playbook we have grown so familiar with, the path he nears, the vengeful outbursts, the dangerous lies, they will have no power there. the former president is connected to criminal investigations on multiple fronts. there is the justice department s investigation on trump s handling of classified documents, which most recently was a federal judge says he is inclined to unseal parts of the search affidavit and has ordered the justice department to make redactions. then, there s trump s efforts
yesterday, 37 asylum seekers arrived on the kent coast. but they could face potential removal to rwanda, because they ve travelled from france, a safe country. this is the boeing 767, chartered by the home office to take the first group of asylum seekers on a one way ticket to rwanda later today. the plane can carry around 200 on the 4,095 mile journey, but only eight asylum seekers will be aboard, three of whom are in court in the next few hours, arguing to be removed from the flight home. home secretary priti patel has long argued the policy is in the public interest, designed to deter unnecessaryjourneys from safe eu countries, and thwart the criminal gangs charging for dangerous channel crossings. shame on you! the policy is, though, dividing public opinion, evidenced by these scenes outside the courts ofjustice yesterday, and the home office. some agree it s an effective way to deal with illegal migration. but for others, it s an unsafe
seekers on a one way ticket to rwanda later today. the plane can carry around 200 on the 4,095 mile journey, but only eight asylum seekers will be aboard, three of whom are in court in the next few hours, arguing to be removed from the flight. home secretary priti patel has long argued the policy is in the public interest, designed to deter unnecessaryjourneys from safe eu countries and thwart the criminal gangs charging for dangerous channel crossings. shame on you! the policy is, though, dividing public opinion, evidenced by these scenes outside the courts ofjustice yesterday, and the home office. some agree it s an effective way to deal with illegal migration. but for others, it s an unsafe and unlawful way to treat vulnerable people who are asking for sanctuary in the uk. the leaders of the church of england, including the archbishops of canterbury and york, have written an open