Candidates, nominees from president republican president s have learned a lot about how to deal with the hearings. When you heard kavanaugh say as he did, talking about the parties to the case that theyre Flesh And Blood Human Beings and we need to have empathy for them and real world consequences of the court are very important. As a political matter, great stuff. A legal matter, its nonsense. Were youre an Appellate Judge and an issue comes before you, the issue is not the parties. Youre to resolve the legal issues. Its a purely legal matter. The parties may happen to be the case that they pick to do that. Now, obviously its as well as a human being to say you care about the parties, yes, you should, but thats smart to say that. Bork said when he was asked about why he wanted to be on the court back then, he said among other things, he said it was an intellectual feast. His critics got all over that. To him its a theoretical matter
kavanaugh. One is cory booker and kamala harris. No
More than half of 189,000 New Zealanders on the Jobseeker benefit have received it for at least a year, data from the Ministry of Social Development (MSD).
administrations, at one point or another, have taken credit for historically low unemployment rates for african americans. but why is the wealth gap unmoved? and what can be done from a policy perspective? well, looking at what president obama said, it s because this is simply unfinished business. when you have black households having $24,000 worth of wealth and white houses having up to $189,000 worth of wealth, this should show that the wealth gap is renewed segregation. look, it s gonna take more than just dei an issue lives, and hiring more black people, and increasing promoting black people, and higher pay to close the wealth gap. there s been studies that show it s gonna take trillions of dollars to close the wealth gap between black and white in this country. some of those studies say, look, we don t have to do it through taxes. we can do it through government bonds. but we also, the important
$189,000 in 2022 to the law firm where de oliveira s lawyer, john irving, is a partner. realistically, if the feds are looking to flip or get de oliveira to cooperate, how will they do that if the former president is paying his legal bills? is this not some sort of an ethics violation? not on its face. a lawyer has an ethical duty to the client, not the person paying the lawyer. so for example, in corporate cases, it s not uncommon if there are multiple people employed by a corporation who are indicted, the corporation will often pay those legal bills. the problem would often arise if mr. de oliveira s attorney was not loyal to mr. de oliveira and in fact loyal to trump. we have no reason to believe that s the case. john irving is a well-respected lawyer. i know him personally.
at which point trump told not indict trump was loyal and the de oliveira which is not to do anything to affect his relationship to trump. that same, day after nadia s request, trump confirmed in a tracker up with nada and the pack representative that de oliveira was loyal. that same day trump called the and told deliver that trump would get cielo vera an attorney. and quote. now that not angela where are tangled in trump s web of lies they found themselves in a difficult legal position. according to filings from the federal election commission, we know that in 2022 the firm where de oliveira s attorney is a partner was paid more than $189,000 by trump s save america back. similarly, the law firm which for which nauta works was paid $120,000 through november of last year. both cases however it is not clear if that s just to cover each of their legal bills since both law firms represent