consistent with this nation s historical tradition of firearm regulation. that s it. no longer can we strike the balance. only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this nation s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual s conduct falls outside the second amendment s unqualified command. shocking. absolutely shocking. that they have taken away our right to have reasonable restrictions. we can have restrictions on speech. you can t yell fire in a crowded theater. but somehow there s no restrictions allowed on the second amendment. this is new york. we don t back down. we fight back.
speech. you can t yell fire in a crowded theater. she should correct that. you can t yell fire in a crowded theater if there is no fire. people get that wrong including the governor of new york, apparently. she goes on to say somehow there are no restrictions on the second amendment. this is new york. we don t back down. we fight back. your reaction to that. i also think 135 page decision. we all are reading it. that s not accurate. this isn t a saying a free for all. it will change the way and criteria you have to show to get a concealed carry license but not doing away with the fact that the state can know who is carrying, decide how these licenses are meted out. it is just taking away the elevated showing that you have to show something specific or a specific threat in order for you to get there. they will still be able to have concealed carry permits and licenses in new york. the fact is there are