fundamental shift but also e-r reñú implications of a rulinguvú2-ix thiìc% thiìc% åhs added this caveat,ç7 it remainso be seen what exactlyz:n supr court doesem rule,e victor. !wigp jdtq) q,pecting tocñpz son kaitly.n rpeaking in0 because she s in theqfñ roomórs waiting for the president, to talk aboute4)+ñ javelin missile going to ukraine. c here he comesñe: now. we ll get to hisñe remarks. let s bring in cnnybñdw?z repor ariane de vogue. this draft opinion irñ+ hi d eñ how supreme court. it s a thelu[most 45 called6u[m stare nhrar]ah9%w;wyo÷ó[l covi@)+b; te 6!gwl justice sonia7ódm sotomay pushing back, why arew9t7aú we suddenly now reversing roe v. wade3añd orq years. she said some peoplue to say it s because we veatipñe suddenly had an ?z2dinflux of conservatives appointed to the court. i have to jump inñod, here.u i have to jump inñod, here.u we re going to back ) alabama, presiderçiñwviñwvyñ7rg -k a lou plant. @tñ: me, andd make a2ynpst�
and two new omicron variants found in more than a dozen states, as covid cases begin to rise once again. good morning. and welcome to way too early, on this tuesday, may 3rd. i m jonathan lemire. in a potentially ground-breaking shift in american constitutional law, the supreme court appears poised to strike down the landmark roe v. wade decision. according to a leaked draft opinion, published last night, by politico, a majority of the supreme court is prepared to overturn the federal right to abortion. the leak of the 98-page document is unprecedented in the court s modern history. the draft opinion was reportedly offered by justice samuel alito, and circulated back in february. alito writes in part this. ro ex was egregiously wrong from the start. its reasoning was exceptionally weak and the decision has had damaging consequences. it is time to heed the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people s elected representatives. nbc news has not obtained or
abortion, the moment of supreme court would rule against roe. half the country has anti-abortion republican state legislatures and governors who might do the same. president biden made his comments at joint base andrews on his way to alabama in the last hour. the idea that concerns me a great deal that we re going to, after 50 years, a woman does not have a right to choose within the limits of the supreme court decision is number one. even more equally profound is the rationale used. it will mean every other decision regarding privacy is thrown into question. the rationale of the decision as released, were it to be sustained, a whole range of rights are in question, a whole range of rights. the idea with letting the states make those decisions would be a fundamental shift in what we have done. it goes far beyond, in my view, if it becomes a law and if what is written is what remains, it goes far beyond the concern of whether or not there s the right to choose. if this decis
captured on tape that reveal his private beliefs about 1/6 and his conclusion that donald trump bears responsibility for the insurrection as well as mccarthy s admission about the seriousness of the 1/6 attack and the complicit of members of his own caucus, all of which he would later lie about, probably downplay and excuse. here s some of the comments that have made headlines this week. again, they were obtained by new york times reporters jonathan martin and alex burns from his book this will not pass that will provide a preview of the story that the 1/6 committee plans to tell with their evidence. let me be very clear to all of you, and i ve been very clear to the president. he bears responsibilities for his words and actions. no ifs, ands or buts. the only discussion i would have with him is that i think this will pass ask it would be my recommendation he should resign. tension is too high. the country is too crazy. i don t want to look back and think we caused
lawrence: buckle up 6:00 a.m. on the east coast friday, march the 22nd. this is fox & friends. an insane scene at the border. more than 100 migrants, illegally trying to cross the border busted down razor wire and mowing down national guardsmen. brian: same judge who fined the former president now saying the trump organization needs a babysitter for three years. ainsley: and the surprising heart health risk associated with intermittent fasting. so take this as your sign to go ahead and eat your breakfast with us. steve: immediately. fox & friends starts right now. and, remember, mornings are better with friends. carley: the new york judge in former president trump s civil fraud trial is ordering the courts to continue monitoring the trump organization s finances for the next three years. lawrence: and the state attorney general taking initial steps to prepare to seize trump s new york s assets if he does not secure the $454 million bond by monday s deadline.