Witnesses Clash Over Potential Pros and Cons of PERA in Senate IP Subcommittee Hearing

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today held a hearing featuring eight witnesses who testified about the need to restore certainty to U.S. patent eligibility law. Most, but not all, agreed such a need exists and urged quick passage of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023.

Related Keywords

Japan ,China ,United States ,Courtenay Brinckerhoff ,Adam Mossoff ,Brian Pomper ,Richard Blaylock ,Phil Johnson ,Philip Johnson ,David Kappos ,Foley Lardner ,Andrei Iancu ,David Jones ,Chris Coons ,Antonin Scalia Law School ,Pillsbury ,Innovation Alliance ,Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee On Intellectual Property ,Supreme Court ,Council For Innovation Promotion ,Shaw Pittman ,Trademark Office ,George Mason University ,Tech Inventors Alliance ,Invitae Corporation ,Us Court ,Senate Judiciary Committee ,Intellectual Property ,Patent Eligibility Restoration Act ,Thom Tillis ,Innovation Promotion ,Isolated Natural ,Director Andrei Iancu ,Century Patent Reform ,Chair Chris Coons ,Federal Circuit ,Not Patentability ,Senator Mazie Hirono ,Present Eligibility Law ,Professor Adam Mossoff ,Mark Deem ,Lightstone Ventures ,High Tech Inventors Alliance ,