"We are very disappointed by the decision, as it comes at the expense of the North Atlantic right whale and at a very precarious time for it, when 93 percent of the remaining 340 population rely on this small area within which the Vineyard Wind and eight additional projects will be located," the group said in a prepared statement. "We firmly believe that the court should not give deference to the federal agencies which are recklessly fast-tracking these projects. We plan to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States as we believe that this is a landmark case and a significant industrialization of the ocean."
Related Keywords
Spain ,National Marine Fisheries Service ,Massachusetts ,United States ,Copenhagen ,Køavn ,Denmark ,Spanish ,Joe Biden ,Ellen Mayo ,Craig Gilvarg ,Indira Talwani ,Gustavo Gelp ,William Kayatta ,Veronica Bonnet ,Sandra Lynch ,Us First Circuit Court ,Bureau Of Ocean Energy Management ,Us Department Of Justice ,Supreme Court ,Us Court ,Atmospheric Administration ,Us District Court ,Avangrid Renewables ,District Court ,National Oceanic ,Us Supreme Court ,National Environmental Policy ,Vineyard Wind ,Nantucket Residents Against Turbines ,First Circuit ,Endangered Species Act ,North Atlantic ,Ocean Energy Management ,National Environmental Policy Act ,National Marine Fisheries ,Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners ,Circuit Court ,Val Oliver ,Annual Town Meeting ,Select Board ,Good Neighbor Agreement ,President Joe Biden ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.