Canadian courts and law societies, alike, are faced with an ever-evolving challenge: straddling the line between recognizing the potential benefits of emergent generative artificial intelligence GenAI, while balancing the associated risks of using this technology. Principle to these associated risks is the ability of GenAI to hallucinate i.e., generate incorrect information.
Related Keywords
Northwest Territories , Canada , United Kingdom , Quebec , Canadian , Newfoundland , British , Stephen Burns , Scott Bower , Ahmed Elmallah , Sebastien Gittens , Nova Scotia Barrister Society , Artificial Intelligence In Court Proceedings , Law Society Of Manitoba Code Professional , Law Society Of Ontario , Law Society , Law Society Of Alberta , Federation Of Law Societies Canada , Law Society Guidelines On Use Of Gen , Court Use Of Artificial Intelligence , Guidance On Court Own Use Of Gen , Integrity Of Court Submissions In Provincial , Integrity Of Court Submissions , Court Jurisdiction , Artificial Intelligence In Court Submissions , Openai Terms Of Service , Supreme Court , British Columbia Supreme Court , Economic Development Canada , Terms Of Service , Justices Of The Alberta Court , Written By Stephen Burns , Court Submissions , Practice Directions Issued , Canadian Courts , Chief Justices , Alberta Court , Legal Profession Ensuring , Using Large Language , Federal Court , Artificial Intelligence , Certified Tribunal Records , Provincial Court , Nova Scotia , Superior Court , Court Submissions When Using Large Language , Own Use , Society Guidelines , How Lawyers Can Safely Take Advantage , Opportunities Offered , Data Act , Professional Responsibility , Manitoba Code , Professional Conduct , Nova Scotia Barrister , Generative Artificial Intelligence , Law Societies , Model Code , Consumer Privacy Protection Act , Personal Information , Data Protection Tribunal Act , Bennett Jones Privacy , Data Protection , Artificial Intelligence Insights ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.