well, again, if, if, if, if in, if, in order for anybody to claim that none of their ramifications the repercussions, the result would not have been realized, would be too insult to these fish people with, with the most brutal accusations of, of stupidity. how can you, of all the things allegedly, to do it kit. there's only one reason why this particular savage. now, by the way, is anybody claiming i don't think so, but does anybody claiming non sabotage? i don't think so. is anybody claiming, while it's a force mature, which is one of the claims that china made as to these balloons? it happens at an act of providence. things happen. it's a mistake. and sometimes pipelines detonate in what appears to be an explosive device. it did. nobody saying so, so that's been rolled up and i'm a lawyer by profession. i'm, i'm a x prosecutor. we're looking at this. so the question is, parties involved, you know, how we always have on, on, on criminal investigations. do you have the intent, the opportunity, the reason the motivation? well, if you just look at who's involved here and just listen, listen to the, to the responses. you know, very rarely do you have folks coming in saying basically precisely in this kind of a kind of a vatike pie thought a prediction of what's gonna happen exactly what happens and then say, i don't know where you get off. and again, i can't say this enough, i'm not trying to excuse it. i understand governments. i'm a realist when it comes to international relations. i am a realist, i understand this. i understand and how sometimes, duplicity. there are reasons why sometimes governments have to say things because of security or national. i got it. but the media, do you remember the time when people would lunge for a story to be the 1st one to say i got it? i smell a rat. irrespective of the country, where are the journalists, where are these brave brazen intrepid reporters to day going out? yeah, they're not saying anything. if, if you watch western media, you, you don't know anything about this. are you kidding? if this were donald trump? it, it, i mean it would be fraud page. it's not only hypocrisy, it's a skid soil detached duplicity. and again, citizens of the world must say, how much longer do you have to be slapped in the face by this 4th estate, this journalistic, this, this negligent on the part of people. and it's not just this story. it's story after story. look at what's happening. it's, it's something that i never thought what happened. we always say, you know, the, the pressed, the media have gone too far. not the more. thank you. legal and media analyst, lajna. thank you. thank you. that was the weekly with the hour and weeks of news stories from all around for more of to the minute. updates had over to r t dot com. thanks for tuning in. we'll see a back at the top of the hour. ah ah with well, mister ambassador, i do wanna thank you for this great opportunity to speak with you and also extend you greetings for the day of russian diplomacy. so i will begin by asking you recently we heard that zalinski, the ukrainian leader, has said that the minsk agreement was simply to was simply a concession. that's the language he described it with. and he went on to say it cannot be implemented. we've also heard from angela merkel. she has said that it was simply a tactics a by time for the ukrainian army. so my question is, does that change the possibility of future negotiations and on what terms would russia be willing to engage in such talks? first of all, thank you very much for your congratulations and due to the survey means for us, this is a day remembering that the tradition so the russian saw it and the russian diplomacy and well look to remember. oh, on what you asked me. i think he already gave an answer partly at least indeed we heard this sir, recent statements by zalinski, by i'm going medical by you a bible on the bipolar sunk himself. which simply betray the extra confessed that means agreement. so what a hoax to buy time for your cri, besides music agreement. so use the keys of the failed you input events, because have they been implement faithfully? nothing. what were witnesses they would be happening, but they were not meant to be implemented. so when people say this started dealing with some will, might be, will my dear diversity will say you are on chronology that started 9 years ago. 9 years ago we were begging you to listen to us. nobody did. now we've heard from a number of western leaders that they think the only way this work and is with the defeat of russia. so if that is the town, is there any hope for negotiations or piece? they're not just saying that it can only end with the end of russia. they're saying they're talking now about dismembering russia. they're talking about destroying russia. they are, they are a talking talking. some of the officials, high level officials, are talking about the russian leadership. what's that where they should be, where it is now, some statements go beyond the beyond, not just simply diplomacy, but, but serialized. civilized, the communication or on a possibility of negotiations. opposition is very clear. we stated numerous times, we stated the goals of all our special military operation. what the design full. we were ready and still already foresee as negotiations which were interrupted, so see stop by, but ukrainians, or of course on the, on the order from their masters and sponsors in april last year. besides, there are numerous statements by the ukrainian high level officials on how the c a possibility of negotiating was russia. besides, that is a law had decreed when that was signed by president zelinski himself, where he or where he prohibited himself to deal with the current russian leadership . ah, so we do not see any seated attempts on the plain inside to engage the negotiations and all those initiatives that we're hearing from them on on the piece plan. on various summit, sir, this is frankly joke o. besides, we know for good that the they're not calling the shots, those who can enforce them for cds negotiations. or they lever in this country somewhere in europe or on one of the aisles across the, the english channel. if they are willing to do so, they will engage, but so we don't see any willingness or the body of responses of keith to go to her negotiations with russia and do it, do it to citizen. and besides, besides, were not the garage hating on the bills of ultimatums to the for you? now at the united nations security council, you have repeatedly pointed out that pouring more weapons and the key is not going to bring peace, it's going to prolong the suffering for along the depths. but we hear the u. s. representative. just continue to dismiss everything you put forward about the danger of lethal aid and weapons going into kia. do you think that there is any hope for waking up the last about the long term consequences and what's going to result from pouring all these weapons into ukraine? there is always a hope for waking up, but i'm afraid they're they're still fast asleep on the matter. we just said the, we had the security council briefing, which we requested cluster of this week in effect earlier this week on the i'm supposed to clean and where does it keep an enormous efforts money that pulls into you claim the feeds the conflict. you know that we invited the roger was so put up, briefing them, and there were doubts that he could be a brief on that better, which he proved he could. and quite a, quite ably, i would say we, he was not the pro ration when he spoke. he's for, from what you think. we never, when we invite brief us to the security council, will never dictate them condition on what they should be saying. not providing scripts for them. you have what, what's happened the at the meeting. indeed, so we're, so far, this is a conversation between the deaf and the blood. now, there is talk of the western countries convening some kind of war crimes tribunal against russian. and if that were to take place, would it be possible for russia to then bring things to the front and go back to 2014, talk about the atrocities that have been committed. i, you know, talk about the repression of the orthodox church and other activities going on in ukraine. would this be possibly a mistake where things they don't want brought into the conversation would suddenly be a topic we've been raising these issues all is 9 along 9 years. ah, consistently we continued to de so, but you have for to recognize there is an iron wall a night of media will i would say are we are trying, we are doing our best to bring that that to the people are recently, but so far not so long ago we held the so called our formula meeting on what is happening in don't bust then what has been happening there in not just all these years within this months, because in this months the shelling of don barza residential areas. anthony, i intensified enormously. ah, $16000.00 in the couple of last month. ah, if i'm not mistaken, we brought witnesses live witnesses who, who gave their personal accounts on what is happening. all is ignored. they read their mantises from the script, are not willing to listen to anything. yes, many of those who are committing crimes in the grain today on the part of the givers you should stamp. and we are saying about that the officially that we're noting down all the crimes that the give resume was committing against the its own population basically. and against the people of don bus, ah, we will not forget it. and they will one day with another stem throw for the cries, they committed to include on the battlefield fund when they used to civilians as a shield with other uses as a shoe. they do all the time when they commit crimes against the prisons of war. even those outrageous things like what happened to a couple of days ago with the killing rabbit repeating the killing a blank shots of the russian prisons. a war is a, is largely a glory ignored by the worst. but the office of human rights was, was forced to recognize that the plots a geniune and the deserves being investigated. now in western leaders talk and they frequently reference this rules based global order. that's the thing they constantly are speaking about. my question for you is how is that kind of rhetoric and his talk of a rules based global global order? how is that viewed in south america in asia, in africa? how is the world reacting to the words of us and western leaders where we've been speaking about this settles based world order, long type are saying that it's not international, which is a embodied primarily in the u injured. not many listen to our cities live the time . but now i think the, the opinion in those countries, the to that you mentioned sir, is changing. we just recently celebrated the 20th anniversary of the of colin powell v o. in the security council, which you may consider to be the beginning of the current phase of this new rules based international order. we are saying 12, but this that was happening today. you should look at it carefully. and then the said that today they came after russia. busy tomorrow they will come after any country that will be not marching in june with those who sinking the on the world. and then a follow up by asking, what do you see the role of russia being in, in a multi polar world that is emerging. the world is much bigger than, than the so called collect to west or the world is or africa. the world is a great the you asia, the world is latin america. and indeed, indeed, the world is becoming more multi paula, multi paula: perhaps it becomes less and less multilateral on the part of at least a certain group of countries. but the role of russia, you will, you will never erase ashley from the world map whether somebody alexis on the russia will be, or was a major playing the world politics. okay, now let me ask about the un security council itself. how do you assess the work that they've been doing? i know there been calls for reforming the un security council and the representation on it. where does russia stand on all of this? we are not subjecting the reform of the security council of that process goes long time more than 20 years. and that is not a, that is not the a problem over of russia or anybody else brookings, that are such grave contradictions between the positions of groups of countries, an individual coverage that we cannot chiva anything that could be, could be construed as consensus or sometime shortly. so to say, but we are saying that we, we, we recognize that the world to do it today. and the security council does not represent fully the world today that has changed since the time when the security council was established. we say that that such such religions as, especially african asia and latin america under represented there. and that should be, that should be rectified. we do not see any of that value in adding to the security council, especially as permanent members of the countries of the so called collector west because we have enough of them already. and we don't see that they will contribute to the work of the security council any anyhow differently from what we're seeing today. but again, i say the processor, the so called into governmental negotiations on the security council reform are going on in the general assembly. but so far we are not the somewhere we get where we can, we didn't, we were where we can say we again, the chief in chief agreement. so on this reform in, in the nearest church. now, earlier in our conversation, you referenced that horrendous video of the execution of prisoners of war. and it's now verified, it's authentic, this crime was committed. what will it take for western media to kind of start acknowledging the horrible things that he is doing? do you see any possibility of widespread acknowledgement of these atrocities? i mean, there's western media just not going to acknowledge these realities. perhaps the other knology that's within themselves, but they're simply ignoring its own on the mass media. if you thought perhaps, or of course, remember her such sure. such a horrible stages as you, as the so called massacre and watcher or the killing of people at the railway station parameters are on crowd. those, these unfortunate people were, were, were hit the killed by the ukraine and me so which was on before to now they're not talking about that at all. but in the public opinion of it is the russian crime. nobody looks for the, for the details. what happened, how it happened, what was throwing up, so i'm not very optimistic that this to her and describes, will be brought to the western public her by the wrist media. now, recently i, you talked about how western leaders were objecting to cooperation between molly and russia and the you use the term neo colonial to describe their attitude. why is it that they seem to be so bothered about russia? is growing relationship with africa, and can you describe that relationship for us? that are the relationship between russia and africa with african countries where many but there is growing and that the causes jealousy and the pots of those companies who consider the that to be their back. yet, i will give you one example. i think i will not betray anything secret. now by now, a couple of years ago at the high level segment of the general assembly, minutes to leverage was meeting the current chief european diplomas. was anybody who distinguished himself recently was some comment. is that the arrest conservation among the public and then the barrel was asking minister level of a why are you dealing with my why molly's trying to to, to engage with you to which minister laurel said, look, this is a sovereign country. they decide with whom to do if they chose to deal with russia, that's their sovereign choice. to which the chief european diplomat said to him the following place. though, mess up in our bucket. can you imagine that while, while it is repeated in western media, frequently that russia is to blame for the global food crisis, that it's all russia's fault? how do people see this around the world? there was a meeting recently her as a recent, as a late january this year of the e. u. comedian agriculture, where they gave where they gave her quite a saba analysis of their problems in the agricultural sector, which is related to the but their, me, to inflation, to energy and food prices to their hiding green transition, etc. so when it comes to themselves, they are able to describe to describe with a, probably enough while for the public, they blamed the current foot crisis on the in fixed by the cram it. we are saying consistently that the put crisis didn't start one year ago. that that was the result of their own policies which preceded that at least 3 or 5 years. but including massive or printing over or for money by the major economies, including the agrees to current policies on foot supplies, et cetera. so of course, this crisis is not the result of for over what was happening last year. now if you are referring to the grain deal or other, not the grain, you were least a wool agreements because there's conceit, they consist of 2 pots. one is the green deal for ukraine, and the other is memorandum on the extra rush and food and fertilizers are from the russian federation. so the, the grain deal is working full steam. ah, it's already more than 20000000 a dance of various grays that were exported from ukraine and they are not flying to the most needed countries are mostly yes, some portion but very small. one like 3 percent of those who are really struggling with hunger at the same time, not a single grain, a singular and very little fertilizers were exported. so according to the 2nd part of the deal. yes sir. the 2nd that a gentleman, i recognize that he's doing his utmost to, to, to, to solve it. but he's a, he's a knocking against the wall because there are so many sanctions, so they keep saying that the agreement, fertilizers are, are not on the sanctions. yes. they are not formally, but friday's insurance is, but banking and financial transactions are you named her. so that does not also contribute to solving the footer crisis in the world. and it main exacerbated because one thing is the full crisis and the, the, the, the, the food itself. the other thing is the future harvest, which depends a lot on the fertilizers and fertilizers, are russian fertilizers, which are, which are paramount for the future. future agriculture production, right. i believe russia at this point is being blocked from sending fertilizer to syria. and i was wondering if this is actually being addressed at the united nations. it's not that sort of asha, was blocked from sending fertilizers to cedar. it is that the operators are not willing to do so because because these fertilizers are considered to do, you will use a shoe products which come under the some famous caesar by this, by the united states. yes, i had that of the secretary general and asked him to help solve that problem because students needed badly, especially now. and this is frederick times of the living so. but so far so far? no, they have not been shipped. and part of the grain deal and the negotiations was that there should be a lifting of all sanctions affecting russian agriculture. but this, from what you're telling me doesn't appear to have been implemented. is there any hope for this being implemented whole was always there, but with the, with the multitude of rules and regulations. so on sanctions these countries introduced in, particularly you, they say they, they made some delegation delegations, but in fact, when, when it comes to the national level, it is not implemented then. secondly, that is this so called a compliance when companies are simply freights to be sanctioned. themselves who are dealing with the russia, even if it is in their view legal, although it is illegal person. well, i want to thank you for your time. i know you are very busy and you've got quite a, a task at hand. you know, standing up to all these lies at the on security council, i wanna say it's really been an honor to speak with you. and thank you very much for taking time out of your day to put thank you a ah, a since the beginning of its history, the united states of america has officially declared the striving for freedom and people's rights to happiness. however, in reality, having won independence, american colonists headed for the total extermination of the indigenous population of the continent, american indians were deprived of their land. local residents were driven into reservations and given the worst agricultural territories. while the best land was appropriated by white colonizers, the strongest blow to american indian tribes was the extermination of buys of native americans lived by hunting these wild animal, colonists slaughter the bison, and in fact, made them nearly extinct. every buffalo dead is in india and gone, said colonel richard dodged a veteran of the bloody and vicious indian wars cynically. the indigenous population was simply exterminated. u. s. army general phillips sheridan express the essence of this policy in the infamous worth. the only good india is a dead indian, the genocide of native americans of north america lead to a demographic catastrophe. the exact number of deaths is deal unknown, but the number of victims is in millions. having been the majority on the continent before the indigenous people make up less than 3 percent of the us population today . ah, ah, reference got some kind offer. i, you know, i'm in wyoming, their own good perception that day even i and he'll get dan putting a game in every ever seattle for life. but they are giving him the opportunity to share your views. not only important, but also in the universities or do the younger people are making a villain, but that is definitely not the give and the you know that he understand what is good for damnation or which is good for people. ah ah, they only do we have like a graphic who what is the best time to actually go about them. this is a little bit of it. i've had to listen to sort of like obligated with what i say school of a car wasn't report backwards but something something that might give me a said to jeff. so, i mean, i mean you can even gone can be comma a utah vehicle or somebody at the community that they've got a lot of, you know, it's all like it's supposed to start out. like you sort of affected dor, fully out of the julia meeting with us. that's a disclaimer. but that was the building just spoken to me. right? nobody for you to call for soaking at them during the summer because of my seat. not with them. we can, i love career was it was the case then you paid us over for you will that they should receive a notice to pick up and that were still a when are you one of them 11. i think it's enough with me. there's a way for me, this is where another ukrainian show in emergency workers are still working here trying to clear out of the rubble perhaps to find more victims under artillery fire. and archie cru reports from the scene. a belated shelling of donna city, beck killed one civilian, leaving at least 3 more wounded, getting caught in the bombardment plough, filming, and unidentified objects thought it over canada is shot down by the u. s. air force . that's the mid touch.