Transcripts For MSNBCW Morning Joe 20180710

Oh, yeah. President trump heads to europe this morning after selecting his nominee last night to the u. S. Supreme court. He leaves the senate to battle over judge Brett Kavanaugh, while nato allies brace for their own confrontations with the american commander in chief, and what a history they already have in such a short time. Welcome to morning joe. Its tuesday, july 10th. With us we have msnbc contributor mike barnicle, former chairman. Republican National Committee Michael Steele and nbc News National plit reporter Heidi Przbyla is with us. A lot to talk about. Quite a late night for everybody watching the big announcement. Well get to the president S Supreme Court pick and his nato trip in a moment. First, the gallup pool shows President Trumps Approval Rating slipped into double digit negative territory as 56 disapprove and 41 approve. This just three weeks after trump received the best marks since the first days of his presidency in midjune only to have his ratings turned back in a negative direction. This was the same time period that his administrations family separation policy at the southern border came into public view. Well get to developments in that story ahead, butthe numbers are staggering. Briefly, willie who could have ever imagined ripping children from their mothers breasts at the border. And then lying about it. And losing the children and then saying youre going to get them back and then you cant get them backened were still trying to figure out where the children are, who would have ever guessed that would actually hurt a president s Approval Rating . Interesting for a guy so obsessed with numbers thought immigration was a winning issue including this issue of separation of families because he believed his base thinks these people are breaking the law. Break the law, there are consequences for it. There have been consequences and his poll numbers tout add couple weeks ago as the gal jum number ticked up is now back where it was. And mike, along with the Supreme Court pick well talk about, this is something republicans are all going to have to answer for in every swing district, every district that Hillary Clinton carried that is now being held by a republican. I mean, this is just a monumentally stupid, immoral and politically shortsighted approach to Border Security and you can see, theres a direct overlay between when donald trump started having his Administration Push a policy that ripped children from their mothers arms to his poll numbers going down. The numbers are proof of the fact while he can find a potential Supreme Court justice, he has found a Supreme Court nominee, he has lost his administration and the Republican Party has lost hundreds of children. Literally. They dont know where these children are. They cant reunite these children, these infants in cases, with their parents. Were talking about children under 5. I think up to 50, literally, they cant find their families. Actually between 50 and 100 children. But the the lives that hang in the balance now is up to 2,000. Again, no access. Again, no answers. Again, no process, which shows that when they put this policy in place and said they hoped that people get the message they had no clue as to how they might be able to track these people and bring them families back together which shows such an extreme callousness and lack of humanitiy when it comes to Americans Values and families. Thats it. The American People are pretty smart and they can understand, okay. He makes a nomination. Brett kavanaugh. What they cant understand is how do you send parents to honduras and children to new york . And leave them here. All right. Well get to that, but certainly those poll numbers are interesting. W we want to get to the Supreme Court pick. Last nime last night in a primetime announcement, the nomination of judge Brett Kavanaugh to succeed jud judge kennedy. No one in america is more qualified and no one more deserving. Tomorrow i begin meeting with members of the senate, which plays an essential role in this process. I will tell each senator that i revere the constitution. I believe that an independent judiciary is the crown jewel of our constitutional republic. If confirmed by the senate, i will keep an open mind in every case. And i will always strive to preserve the constitution of the United States and the american rule of law. Kavanaugh is a graduate of Yale Law School and clerked for Justice Kennedy in 1993. He met Kenneth Starr during a Justice Department fellowship and became a key staff member when starr was the independent counsel investigating the whitewater and the Clinton Lewinsky scandals. Kavanaugh helped write the final report to cons laying out 11 possible grounds for impeaching president bill clinton. Kavanaugh later sherved as geore bushs white House Counsel and kavanaugh was confirmed by a vote of 5736. Meanwhile, a professor at Yale Law School, an oped was penned in support of his colleagues nomination entitled a liberals case for Brett Kavanaugh. He writes in part, in 2016 i strongly supported Hillary Clinton for president as well as obamas nominee for the Supreme Court judge Merrick Garland, but today it is hard to nominate anyone as strong as him. And the actual people that sit on the united stateS Supreme Court, he believes kavanaugh is most qualified to sit there, and unlike even said unlike justice scalia, kavanaugh is deeply immersed in the history of the court and believes that hes about hes as good a selection as any republican president could make. Yes. Senate democrats will put up a fight whoever this was. We know the fight is coming. Theyve talked about that last night, but the truth of the matter where there are progressives that will disagree on guns, apportions and president ial power, this is not a wild judge shapiro pick people are fearing, this is a qualified guy, a guy qualified for this job, this is a guy whos been supported by president bush, jeb bush, john mccain. Conventional republicans, establishment republicans. Not a wildeyed choice, and probably smart by President Trump because it makes it difficult on democrat whose say the world is coming to an end because of hiS Supreme Court pick. And difficult for dems to paint him as a wildeyed fanatic. Oh, absolutely. And it also puts the republicans it puts it puts the republicans, the two republicans thinking of voting against a nominee in a very difficult position as it does the three or four democrats thinking that they would, might, plausibly vote against him too, because hes such a mainstream pick where you have john mccain and you have jeb bush and you have w. And all of these people saying, and liberal law professors from yale saying hes as good as pick as you would find, other than Merrick Garland, if is hart to paint him as a wildeyed and comfort to Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. Yes. Joe manchin, perhaps, but one of the striking things about judge kavanaughs selection last night is i dont think, Michael Steele, the white house could ever have hoped for better optics. This man and his family, a tremendously appealing group of people. The judge himself was certainly not threatening at all in his appearance, in his brief speech last night. Didnt have a mustache and beard. Remember, hall heflin cut right to the court problem going yeah, i dont understand your beard. I think a lot of people have trouble trusting someone that has a beard like that. Why do you have a beard like that, sir . And judge kavanaugh can you believe a senator said that . And talking about coaching his daughters basketball team. A tremendously appealing pick. Michael steele. And hes a former altar boy. I already identify with him nap was that was a good moment and the mon seen monsignor he referenced was a good friend. And red state democrats, for conservative bases and for this white house. Its a solid pick. His jurisprudence is one that has been noted 11 times by the Supreme Court in affirming his decisions, and so this this juris, this future Supreme Court justice, brings a lot to the table. The politics of this, though, is what is the most striking for me in that listening to the wailing and gnashing of teeth, democrats have no one to blame but themselves. Mcconnell called their bluff, in executing the Supreme Court nominee Nuclear Option with Merrick Garland, and others along the way, and the reality now is coming home to roost fo them. They dont have the numbers and the only thing, the only recourse outside of the protests and the marches and the grandstanding is to take the senate. Because thats the only way this changes, and thats not on the shortterm horizon, maybe longer term, but this is going to be a judicial desert for democrats for quite some time. You know, its so easy for us to go back and say, well, if they had only won the presidency in 2016, and if Hillary Clinton had only had a message, if comey hadnt written that letter, if you can go down the list. If they had visited wisconsin things would be different, but that overlooks the fact that democrats lost senate races in wisconsin, in a president ial election year. Something that doesnt happen. In pennsylvania. Thats right. In a president ial election year. The Democratic Party as they get ready to watch the republican 30, 40, 50year dream of switching the court conservative, the Democratic Party needs to look in the mirror and ask not only why they lost the presidency, but why did they get shellacked, as barack obama said, in the house and in the senate . This is theres so many things that have happened over the past couple of years that weve obviously said you can put down to donald trump, his disruptive and i would say destructive approach to the presidency. This is not one of them. This is a natural consequence of people going out and voting in elections, and where elections have consequences. Now, willie, if you were to follow Donald Trumps behavior in office, and if you were to look at at what drives him. Yeah. What drives donald trump to make decisions . Yeah. Then you would say, there is no way, no way, he would select judge kavanaugh. Uhhuh. Coral rose boy, theyre hugging. The last choice of the hard core conservatives who, of course, wanted the judge out of indiana. Right. Theres no logical and im dead serious here. Anybody that really knows trump knows that this would be the last selection. The last selection he would ever make out of those four, but for one thing well i mentioned president ial power. Judge kavanaughs view surrounding investigations of a sitting president are drawing renewed attention this morning. In a 2009 article in the minnesota law review, kavanaugh suggested that president s being exempt from criminal investigations and civil suits while in office. Huh. He wrote that congress should consider passing a law, exempting a president while in office from criminal prosecution and investigation including from questioning by criminal prosecutors or defense counsel. Kavanaugh went on to write we should not burden a sitting president with criminal prosecutions. The president s job a difficult enough as it is. Some Top Democrats seizing on that relation to the ongoing russia probe. Perked the one guy who specifically written that a president in fact should not be the subject of a criminal investigation, which the president is right now. So this seems to me of all the people the most selfserving person he could choose to protect himself from this criminal investigation. Hes a political animal. He has been for a big part of the formative years of his career, and so he thinks of this, i think, as, wow. We need to make sure that the United States of america stays safe by protecting the president from, what . What investigation. From indictment. From prosecution. Thats what troubles me about the whole picture here. Okay. Lets be really clear here. Judge kavanaugh, if hes going to be a scourge of liberals. Liberals need to get right. Judge kavanaugh wrote that law review article in 2009. At the dawn of the obama administration. So it would be the least selfserving thing for a conservative jurist to write which i think actually speaks given the hysteria over barack obama the presidency, it speaks to the content of the judges character, but, heidi, there is no doubt that donald trump and his people have admitted to members of the press already that they did know about this article and it was discussed inside the white house. Make no mistake of it, that this is the reason i mean, i will make no mistake of it. Everybody else draw their own conclusion. You can narrow it down, boil it down, donald trump is the most selfserving, selfinterested politician of certainly of our time thats ever been in the white house. Thats why he has selected judge kavanaugh, because of this single 2009 article, and why he upset a lot of conservatives along the way. To protect hillmself. The question is, will the senate, will those questioning kavanaugh ask him, will they really go after these lines of questioning and ask if hell recuse himself on any questions pertaining the invimt dictment donald trump, since there is a possibility that thats why he got this seat if he gets it . It can speak to the content of kavanaughs character and it can also at the same time speak to Donald Trumps motivations, and thats why it will absolutely be a major line of questioning, and it may even be one of the reasons why, despite all the impeccable credentials we just discussed, Brett Kavanaugh was not one of the two judges who mcconnell recommended donald trump pick who would be easiest to get through the senate and if you look at the democrats messages last night, they absolutely are shifting into high gear on this issue of russia. You have a number of democrats saying even last night before kavanaughs announcement came out that he should in fact recuse himself. This will be now two judges that this president will have put on the court who could potentially in any number of scenarios in terms of constitutional questions about whether he pardons himself, whether he fires mueller, whether he is subpoenaed, could end in a constitutional question before this court. But look more broadly at the democratic messaging. Its not just about russia. The democrats are saying look at the paper trail here. There are a number of points of attack, whether it is the health care law, whether it is russia or whether it is roe. This judge has a long paper trail. He just came into the cross hairs on the issue of abortion just last fall when it pertained to an immigrant teenager trying to seek an abortion. His ruling was, he tried to delay that. He was overruled and in his dissent he wrote, he bashed the decision and used some of the trigger words used by the activist antiabortion crowd in terms of abortion on demand. So there are a number of flash points here that i think are going to make it hard on democrats, but that is where you look for the first cracks as to those red state democrats, donnelly, manchin, heitkamp. He is much of a main stream conservative as merritt garland is a main stream, cant really call garlland a liberal, a moderate, but still, mike, it is very intriguing that kavanaugh wrote a 2009 article that said, president s should not be indicted and should not be tried, and that even the Trump White House, i think it was Maggie Haberman said that the Trump White House admitted that they had seen that and taken note of that in the process. Even if that remains his strong view today, he would be only one of nine on the Supreme Court. So, i mean, he could be overruled internally on the Supreme Court. It could be a 54 decision but its settled law. The democrats have to be very careful. Yeah n. Their approach to this guy. They really they really do. Thats the only take away i feel. Overkill could end up killing them. For instance, if they use whats doug jones going to do . I think doug jones will probably vote against him, but probably be very respectful. Yes. You just cant call this guy a right wing lunatic. Thats exactly the point. He is not dangerous in terms of his appearance, his rhetoric. His opinions, his opinions certainly prove the point that this is a generational change in the court. He would be there for a minimum, i assume, given good health for at least 30 years. But Michael Steele, so many people were saying the same thing about john roberts and john voobts conservative, but john roberts is also an institutionalist, somebody unlike donald trump that actually understands the constitution, reveres the institutions in washington, d. C. Especially the Supreme Court of the United States. And i just dont know what democrats expect if they keep losing elections. This is actually they dont want to hear this, but should probably read the oped that was written by the professor, by the liberal yale professor saying, hey, name me three choices that a republican president could have made that would be better than Brett Kavanaugh. Right. You cant. Right. And thats the reality here in a nutshell. They cant. And donald trump has effectively put a nominee in place that boxes out all other options and hes a strong, prudent choice given as mike noted at the beginning, the other choices that he could have put on the table as well. So thats the reality there. But i think the other thing with respect to this article, this law review article, you have to keep in mind. He wrote that article based on his experience dealing with the clinton impeachment. Right. He was very much a part of that. So he learned from that experience what it does to the presidency. So this was a reaction, a response to that. It just happens to now be in play again nine years later, but youve got to put context here, and a law review article is not an indication how a judge is going to rule with an actual case, because as hes noted in the article, there is no settled law here, because the congress hasnt acted. Again, also noted, key democrats, again, they dont overreach, and attack him for writing this law review article, this law review article was written in 2009. Barack obamas first year, and let me say again. Go back to the time, go back to the place, that actually was a less than safe subject for a conservative jurist to write at the beginning of the obama administration. And the Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer joins us in a little while to discuss the democrats strategy for the upcoming Supreme Court battle. And the president fired off a tweet this norm morning aimed at nato allies hours before heading to brussels to face them in person. It is so painful. International embarrassment. And well talk to Michael Steele more about the deal that republicans have made with donald trump, which is, you give a Supreme Court justices and tax cuts and we let you do everything else, and were going to talk about that deal. There are ramifications to that deal. Is it worth it hes also soon to meet with Vladimir Putin after reportedly commiserating with the russian leader about the stupid people in american government. Meanwhile, brexit is tearing apart the british leadership. Is the prime ministers job in jeopardy . Youre watching morning joe. Well be right back. Find the remote yet . Nah. Honey look, your old portable cd player. My high school rethainer. Oh dont. Its early 90s sitcom star dave coulier. Cut. It. Out [laughing] what year is it . As long as stuff gets lost in the couch, you can count on geico saving folks money. Fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. I love you, basement bathroom of solitude, but sometimes you stink. Febreze air effects doesnt just mask, it cleans away odors. Because the things you love can stink. Are you ready to take your then you need xfinity xfi. . A more powerful way to stay connected. It gives you super fast speeds for all your devices, provides the most wifi coverage for your home, and lets you control your network with the xfi app. Its the ultimate wifi experience. Xfinity xfi, simple, easy, awesome. President trump is set to arrive in belgium later today ahead of the annual nato summit and tweeted before 6 00 a. M. That the organization is not fair to the u. S. Taxpayer. It comes on the heels of the contentious g7 summit in canada with trade wars with several nato members and the eu along with the president ial continued crusade about nato defense spending. It also comes amid increasing concerns over merkel americmera what he may do and learning more about the private phone calls the president has had with the leader of russia. The New York Times reports during a march conversation putin complained several Trump Administration officials tried to prevent the call from happening to which trump responded, those are stupid people. You shouldnt listen to them. That was the same call where trump reportedly congratulated putin on his election victory despite a clear warning by his top aides in briefing notes, do not congratulate. And at this point so Michael Steele you have to ask if he understands what nato is about. I dont think he does. Yes, he does. Why does he Vladimir Putin does not like nato. Russia hates nato. Getting back to bargains conservatives and republicans made, people make bargains with themselves, but this deal that Republican Party has made that the Washington Post writes about this morning talking about how the Republican Party is now trumps party and people are having to change their, the generationalheld views to be in line with donald trump, you know, you get two Supreme Court picks and you get tax cuts, but you also get the destruction of the u. S. Order that made us the most powerful country over the past 50 years, and a huge question mark over what Vladimir Putin has on donald trump. Well, it does leave a big question mark on that, but i think in that bargain, joe, what has been weighed has been the value of the proposition of having for 30, 40 years, Supreme Court decisions that reaffirm a conservative idea, or maybe even ideal about society and family and marriage and business and things like that. A tax policy that at least in the short term gives some mid relief to those particular constituencies and the offset, in the bargain, is, we can recover from this nato thing, if it blows up in our face. The alliance will come together around the u. S. We will once be leaders down the road. I just dont see that necessarily playing out that way, because there comes a point where our nato allies will see us as an unworthy and not reliable partner and decide to do things a different way. Now, the putin piece augments this, as you note, and the reality think is, putin and trump in a room together with no affirmation of what was said, discussed or promised does not bode well for this alliance longer term in terms of its position with crimea and other things that are important to them. And heidi, weve said many times on the show, why dont people like paul ryan, leaders on capitol hill where you work speak out on moments that need speaking out when President Trump violates the norm or the country, for moments like last night, the president offering his nominee, the kind of conservative judge they want on the Supreme Court. It has a the moment that a lot of voters who held their nose and yoesh looverlooked the pers behavior, well, well do it for the Supreme Court justices and now may have two and perhaps more. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 85. Stephen brier will be 80 in a couple of weeks. The nights conservatives and republicans waited for. If you sat down with Mitch Mcconnell during all of those months when frankly he was being bloodiened and bludgeoned, he would tell you this is why he stuck in and people like him and paul ryan did not speak out. First saw tax cut victories and meantime, not just the Supreme Court, a lot of lower courts where Mitch Mcconnell is moving through a high number of judges who they think will remake the courts at that level. On the politics of it, though, i think what were witnessing is a really interesting paradigm shift. Joe, when you showed the poll ratings for instance, and tied them to whats happens in the border kids is right on in terms of the Energy Shifting on issues that traditionally have been Republican Issues in terms of the courts, and immigration. Right . Those have been issues that really energized and animated the gop base. We are seeing that now transferred over to the democratic side, because despite everything that you say about Brett Kavanaugh being a more mainstreamtype pick, any one of these judges on the list, even if they dont overturn roe, they are very likely to uphold restrictions that are moving through at the state level. We have in 2017 alone 63 different restrictions on abortion that are being passed at the state level. We have a sixweek ban on abortion, in iowa, the nations strictest. All will come to the Supreme Court at some point. Even if not overturning roe versus wade, enough to strike it moot. We are correctly covering the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh last evening, but other things around the world that are distant from us in america and from most americans priorities every day, were on the eve of the president of the United States about to go to europe and we have russia led by putin trying to dismantle, disrupt and destroy the European Union and lo and behold, the president of the United States is his principal ally in doing this. Incredible. It really is. If you look at all the concerns that i think so many people have had about him since again, go back to the december 2015 interview we had with donald trump on morning joe, and i think jane nordinger at the National Review one of most important moments of the 2016 campaign because it flashed a light on to sort of Donald Trumps views of the world. And he said that, you know, trump, at that point was saying that putin was a great leader, better leader than obama. He was a strong leader. And he had one thing after another thing after another thing, add more question marks about what does putin have on donald trump . A question weve asked time and time again, and then you look and say what is the one thing that Vladimir Putin what is his number one geopolitical strategic goal . It would be the breaking up of nato. The breaking up of the European Union. Yeah. Geez. Both of which stand as a dagger, he believes, in the heart of the old soviet union. Which as we all know, you call the breakup of the soviet union, the greatest tragedy of the 20th century. Forget the holocaust, forget the 25 Million People stalin killed. Forget the 40 Million People that mall killed. The breakup of the soviet union, he said, was the greatest threat. I do want to say to that point, though, Michael Steele, interesting following up to what heidi said. It is ironic, you know, that politics is this way, but a lot of times when you win the battle, when you win the war, a certain war politically. Yeah. Your team goes your side goes, yeah and then they go home, and they get distracted. I think speaking of the soviet unions collapse on Christmas Day of 1991, that should have been the greatest political windfall for the Republican Party that ever was, because people like you and me grew up as republicans, and there were two things that defined the Republican Party from, you know, 1947 to 1991. And it was it was Big Government and it was the soviet union. The cold war, right. The cold war, but the cold war was always first. Beat the commies was always first. 1991, america did just that. Yeah. 1992, people were looking at george bush going, wait. Why are we going to vote for him . Like, we can vote for a guy who is a potsmoking, draft dodging altering, all the things republican was calling bill clinton, that would have disqualified him for years ago from being president of the United States when we were in the middle of the cold war. Suddenly in 1992 people are like, ah, we won the cold war. Lets move on. I do think on the Supreme Court pick, youre not going to have republicans rushing out to the polls in november going, we won we won because thats not how politics works. Right. You have a lot of angry democrats going out saying, weve got to start winning elections so we can start shaping the judiciary again. They will. The problem for the democrats is, how do they do that . How do they make that case to the American People . In a way that will translate to the ballot box, and i think thats been, to your earlier point, joe, one of the biggest stumbling blocks for democrats for a while now is, how do you win in those states where you need to win, and then also pick up in those states where you could, you know, add to your number . They havent been doing that, and its been a cycle that they havent been able to break. Republicans, in the meantime, have taken advantage ofularly f matters to their constituencies. Donald trump figured that out, made it a main theme while everybody was talking about what he was saying about mexico and the wall, how he was going after muslims, his base was focused on the fact, this brothers going to give us a Supreme Court. That was the only thing that matter to them and went out and voted on that. Does that animate the democrats this fall and beyond, well see. One other thing that Michael Steele and i can tell you is, mika, this that our entire lives have also been filled with republican president s winning elections and selectioning judges that grew in office which means they went to the left, and never fulfilled the promises that conservatives expected them to fulfill. Thats right. And i mean, it happened with Sandra Day Oconnor on abortion. Happened with Justice Kennedy on abortion. It happened with souter on just about everything. These were reagan picks, bush picks. So and it happened actually with john roberts a lot of conservatives would say on obamacare. So when people are trying to figure out why republicans may be more connected to donald trump now than other republican president s in the past he delivers on the Supreme Court, he will be doing something that republicans president s have been promising to do for 40 years, and failing, one way or the other. Yesterday we told you how republican senator ron johnson is advocating, revising the u. S. Sanctions against russia. He also seems to be downplaying the significance of russians meddlesing in the u. S. Election. Well show you that ahead. The cia would actually call that a useful idiot, actually that is actually what the cia would define as a useful idiot. Yeah. Plus the Washington Post Eugene Robinson joins us with his latest piece about what he says are the two most consequential facts about Brett Kavanaugh. Well be right back. Until her laptop crashed this morning. Her salon was booked for weeks, having it problems . Ask a business advisor how to get on demand tech support for as little as 15 a month. Right now, save 300 on our hp 2in1 laptop bundle at Office Depot Officemax with my bladder leakage, the products ive tried just didnt fit right. They were very saggy. Its getting in the way of our camping trips. But with new sizes, depend fitflex is made for me. Introducing more sizes for better comfort. New depend fitflex underwear is guaranteed to be your best fit. No matter how much you clean, does your house still smell stuffy . Thats because your home is filled with soft surfaces that trap odors and release them back into the room. So, try febreze fabric refresher. Febreze finds odors trapped in fabrics and cleans them away as it dries. Use febreze every time you tidy up to keep your whole house smelling fresh air clean. Fabric refresher even works for clothes you want to wear another day. Make febreze part of your clean routine for whole home freshness. Keep it comin love. If you keep on eating, well keep it comin. All you can eat riblets and tenders at applebees. Now thats eatin good in the neighborhood. Joining us now, pollutes pu prize winner Eugene Robinson and cofounder and ceo of Axios Jim Vandehei joins us. Jim, since weve known each other on the hill, last night seems to be the culmination for the dream for a lot of conservatives and republicans over the past generation. You know, 30 years in the making. Conservatives put together a network that was obsessed with the court and its paid off. I dont think you can overstate the importance of this pick. Truly youll have a conservative court potentially for 30 years and for trump, 90 of republicans already like him. A lot of them like him and stick with him regardless of what he does and says because of the court. They can say i voted for him because of the court. Showed me a list. Picked two judges from that list. Livered on what he promised and why evangelical like him so much even when he does things that seem not so christianlike. His license with the base is oh much more powerful today than it was a couple of weeks ago and he can pretty much do whatever the hell he wants to do now and republicans will stick with him. It really does illustrate the importance of your vote. Flip 80,000 votes in three states and you have a liberal court and everybody can look at this and should be fired up. People on both sides should be voting because this is huge. The Court Intervenes in your life, affect your life in meaningful ways in ways bigger than white house and congress does because congress and the white house has such a hard time getting things done in a polarized country. 80,000 votes in a couple of states will likely determine the future of the united stateS Supreme Court for a generation. A generation. So when people tell you to go knock on doors, get your neighbors to the poll, thats why you do t. And how many tens of millions of registered voters didnt go out and vote in 2016 who probably wished they had. Gene, where youre going with your new piece, the two prost cons kesh facts about kavanaugh are, spoiler alert, from to the Social Security administration. Yeah. The two most two big facts are the numbers 53 and 27. 53 years old, according to the Social Securitys actuarial tables, the average 53 american male lives 27 more years. Just an average. In good shape, relatively affluent youll probably live longer. So hes going to have an impact on our lives for more than generations, at least a couple of decades, probably more, two and a half at least, i would say. Supreme Court Justices tend to go into into their 80s. So as ive said before, everybody la said before, but it needs to be beaten into the heads of democrats everywhere. Elections have consequences. And guess ma . Not just president ial elections. State legislative elections have consequences. Elections for congress have consequences. So, gene what do democrats do right now . I mean it would be easy to say, and would seem like the prudent thing to say, dont overreach. Dont go absolutely crazy where youre going to be painted as extremists and radicals with this guy that coaches, you know, basketball and is hard to draw horns on. At the same time, the Democratic Base would say, but wait a second. Mitch mcconnell and republicans burned down washington, d. C. Over Merrick Garland. Whats the best move for democrats . Democrats first of all have to wage a fight. And the base, i think, demands a fight right now. They demand and also, you know, this is this has ban voting issue for republicans, much less so for democrats, and that asymmetry needs to be corrected to the extent that it can. So i think that you know, democrats need to be sensitized to the importance of these judicial appointments, especially Supreme Court appointments. That said, it should not be a fight that that costs red state democrats their seats. So if look, if something comes out in the hearings or in kavanaughs paper trail that ca senator like Susan Collins or Lisa Murkowski to waiver, to balk, to say, gee, i just dont know about this guy kavanugh, then i think democrats need to be united on this because they potentially could have a chance of winning. But if they dont have a chance to win, and i kind of doubt that they will, because i think kavanugh is a pretty careful guy, and well see, but if the battle is already lost, then i think you ought to, you know, people like john tester and Heidi Heitkamp and people in deep red states ought to be able to vote the way they need to vote. Democrats shouldnt put him over the top, put kavanugh over the top but if the battle is already lost dont lose in the process. As expected the theatrics were predictable. Who were the key players behindthescenes in putting this pick together, this pick judge kavanugh over the top . Trump. Hes the only decider on these things. He had his four finalists. He telegraphed them. Some of these activists on the outside who put together these lists over several years had a decisive role in getting to this point. But it was trump. He felt best about this candidate. He told them privately hes got the vote. To your point whether liberals should fight or not. They would be insane not to fight it. If you go to the predicate the court will be conservative 30 years its a long shot fight but as a raw political matter they would be nuts not to do everything they can to drag this out and pull him down. How long can they drag it out . Thats the hard part. They cant drag it out that long. They can request these documents. Hold things up. They want to pull it past the election. Its going be hard to do unless they get some republicans to come along. Their base needs it. If you look at democrats what they have going for them registration super, energy is high, and so they are going to be demanding, they are going to ultimately demand that democrats fight this tooth and nail because they understand the consequences of it. It will be nasty. All these court fights are nasty. Jim vandehei well be reading the axios newsletter this morning. Eugene robinson all your pieces in the the Washington Post including trumps trip to nato, entitled america will survive trump, the rest of the world might not. Still ahead last month hhs secretary said it would be easy to reunite parents and children. Well it turns out they cant do it. Thats coming up on morning joe. And now for the rings. Im a fouryearold ring bearer with a bad habit of swallowing stuff. Still wont eat my broccoli, though. And if you dont have the right overage, you could be paying for that pricey love band yourself. So get an allstate agent, and be better protected from mayhem. Like me. Can a ring bearer get a snack around here . Ayep, and my teeth are yellow. . Time for whitestrips. Crest glamorous White Whitestrips are the only adaaccepted whitening strips proven to be safe and effective. And they whiten 25x better than a leading whitening toothpaste. Crest. Healthy, beautiful smiles for life. Metastatic Breast Cancer is relentless, but im relentless too. Mbc doesnt take a day off, and neither will i. And i treat my mbc with new everyday verzenio the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. In fact, verzenio is a cdk4 6 inhibitor for postmenopausal women with hr , her2 mbc, approved, with hormonal therapy, as an everyday treatment for a relentless disease. Verzenio an ai is proven to help women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. Diarrhea is common, may be severe, and may cause dehydration or infection. Before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection. Verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. Serious liver problems can occur. Symptoms may include tiredness, loss of appetite, stomach pain, and bleeding or bruising more easily than normal. Blood clots that can lead to death have also occurred. Talk to your doctor right away if you notice pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain or rapid breathing or heart rate. Tell your doctor if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. Common side effects include nausea, infections, low red and white blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. Im relentless. And my doctor and i choose to treat my mbc with verzenio. Be relentless. Ask your doctor about everyday verzenio. Coming up, President Trump is set to depart the white house at any moment now for the nato summit in brussels. Well watch to see if he addresses cameras on the way out. Plus let the Supreme Court confirmation fight begin. Well talk to the leader of Senate Democrats Chuck Schumer and on the other side james l langford is our guest. Morning joe is coming right back. Booking a flight at the last minute doesnt have to be expensive. Just go to priceline. Its the best place to book a flight a few days before my trip and still save up to 40 . Just tap and go. For the best savings on flights, go to priceline. I saw my leg did not look right. I landed. I was just finishing a ride. I felt this awful pain in my chest. I had a pe blood clot in my lung. I was scared. I had a dvt blood clot. Having one really puts you in danger of having another. My doctor and i chose xarelto®. Xarelto®. To help keep me protected. Xarelto® is a latestgeneration blood thinner thats. Proven to treat and reduce the risk of dvt or pe blood clots from happening again. In clinical studies, almost 98 of patients on xarelto® did not experience another dvt or pe. Xarelto® works differently. Warfarin interferes with at least 6 of your bodys natural bloodclotting factors. Xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor. Dont stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of blood clots. While taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. Xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. It may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. Get help right away for unexpected bleeding or unusual bruising. Do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. Before starting, tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures and any kidney or liver problems. Learn all you can. To help protect yourself from another dvt or pe. Talk to your doctor about xarelto®. Anncr as you grow older, your brain naturally begins to change which may cause trouble with recall. Learning from him is great. When i can keep up anncr thankfully, prevagen helps your brain and improves memory. Dads got all the answers. Anncr prevagen is now the numberoneselling brain Health Supplement in drug stores nationwide. She outsmarts me every single time. Checkmate you wanna play again . Anncr prevagen. Healthier brain. Better life. Inthe full value oft replace your new car . Youd be better off throwing your money right into the harbor. Im gonna regret that. With Liberty Mutual new car replacement, well replace the full value of your car. Liberty. Liberty. Liberty. Liberty. Any moment now President Trump is set to leave the white house en route to europe. To meet with nato allies. Already some tough lines are being drawn. The president tweeted over an hour ago, up early, click, click, click, repeating his complaint that member countries of nato arent paying enough for mutual defense. Let us now go to bangladesh hard to laugh but im going to go along with this because i like youre trying to be joyful during difficult times. We have a tweet that i know its not a tweet, alex but bangladesh is a step ahead of him. Willie is there. Hell read a tweet that the president of the United States can you hear me willie . Can you hear me . Yes, i have you now joe. The president of the United States tweeted this. Quote, nato countries must pay all caps more, United States must pay all caps less. Very unfair. One more Interesting Development here. After that, the president of the European Union, donald tusk, the president of the European Union. Thats an important position. He wrote, quote dear america appreciate your allies. After all you dont have all that many. The president of the European Council donald tusk. Oh, my lord. And the band strikes up. Happy days are here again. That was some tough news from bangladesh. Now im back. Hes not smart. Welcome back to morning joe. Its tuesday, july 10th. With us when you say that could you spin around in your chair. No. Why . Oh, like crazy lady on snl . That would be you. [ laughter ] have the tables turned . Im joe london. All right. By the way, that was a great combination, joan lundon and david hartman. I liked everything shes done. Somebody else we love, mike barnacle. We do. And his wife ann. National correspondent for the Washington Post phillip bump. Republican strategist and msnbc political analyst on day 18 straight up working. Editor chief of law fair and msnbc legal analyst and Legal Affairs correspondent for npr joins us. Good to have you all on board this morning. By the way, barnacle, i got to give you mad props earlier, off air you brought up festus. Not a lot of people breathing air can remember gunsmoke. Festus was my favorite character. Reminded me of my father. That explains an awful lot. Look at that. When did this happen . Is that new . I missed it. Alex mike, why alex, what happened. Hold on, hold on, hold on. Somebody doesnt just lay a you know what in the middle of our set and doesnt go unexplained. What is this . Well a couple of months ago i think mike had a good point and we suggested we do something has he had one since . No. First time. It took about four months. Festus is now a hot thing . Comparing festus to your father. Why dont you compare the guy who was the guy that got thrown in jail on gomer pyle. I know we have a lot of smart people. Hello, nina. We were trying to explain the maddening phenomenon of republicans being loyal to donald trump for some of us republicans. It is hard for younger americans to understand how youre putting me with you . Im supposed to be as old as you . No. Nobody is as old as me. Wheres the hot take now . From what you read in history books last year in your senior year of college, while writing your thesis on conservatism in the court, its hard for a lot of americans to understand why this matters so much to republicans. They have seen time and time again a republican president elected, and it was in 89 Sandra Day Oconnor making a decision that kept roe on the books, whether it was kennedy later doing the same thing. They felt like they kept electing republican president s and no one of delivered the goods and now you have donald trump going just that. Well, were on the verge, i think, of seeing roe, perhaps, overturned or just simply nickel and dimed away so that the states that to regulate it down to the point where its inaccessible in those states, abortion may be technically a right but not in those states. You would be unable to get an abortion in probably about half the country, and that particularly affects poor people and people who live in rural areas who have to go a very far distance to get abortions. Isnt that already the case in quite a few states. I read stories where there may be one or two abortion providers left in one or two states. Thats true. Theres litigation. At one point there was an attempt to get rid of all the abortion clinics, for example, i think theres one left in mississippi thats being kept open by court order. I think you can imagine whole states where abortion would not be available, and the only thing i can think that might revolutionize this is at least in the early stages of pregnancy, in the first trimester would be medical aborings, not surgical abortions with doctors prescribing by remote operation, you know, like were sitting here, im talking to you from one part of msnbc and youre in another part. You could do that state to state in medicine and they do in lots of other for lots of other procedures and medical consults and thats important, i suppose. But, you know, you could imagine the fights over this. For democrats its doubly difficult because, you know, having another conservative republican albeit a very distinguished one on the Supreme Court means many, many other changes that are incredibly significant. But the right that people can most grab on to, that lots of people are scared of losing, if you look in the Public Opinion polls is the right to have access to an abortion if you want, or if your daughter wants, or if your sister wants, or whatever. And so im afraid that these confirmation hearings are going to devolve into a fight thats only about abortion when it probably should be about much more and its going to be interesting to see how judge kavanugh who, as i said, a very distinguished judge and a very accomplished judge, who will have, if confirmed, a lot of influence on the court and already has friends on the court like elena kagan is his friend. Its interesting to see how the questioning goes. Because there was a study out just this week or last week about how increasingly judicial nominees dont answer questions at all. Judge gorsuch now Justice Gorsuch the least of anyone since 1968, and, you know, the senate has a duty to inquire, but the nominee also has a duty from text his or her independence. Its a very interesting and difficult proposition. I didnt mean to get so serious. That must have been a hell of a thesis. I would like to read it sometime. You tweeted last night after the announcement quote i had known Brett Kavanuagh for a long time in a number of different capacities. Ill have a lot to say about i had nomination in the coming days. For now ill say hes a colorly and thoughtful jand an extremely fine person. What else do you want to say about the nomination here of judge kavanugh . Gosh, look, this is a person with a very extensive record across a lot of different areas. You know, he was he was a staffer in the starr investigation and im sure, you know, that will give rise to a lot of interesting lines of questioning in the hearings, particularly since he was a significant voice in writing ken starrs report to congress. He also played a very significant role in the Bush White House under, you know, in the wake of 9 11 and in bushs own judicial confirmations, and more recently he has been, you know, a d. C. Circuit judge in a period in which this is sort of relevant to my field in which the d. C. Circuit has done just an enormous amount of work in shaping the contours of American National security law. This is actually a person the fight will definitely be largely over abortion, but this is a person who has done more than most in shaping a lot of areas of contemporary law, and i dont doubt that the fight will be very ugly. I dont doubt that, you know, democrats will make it mostly about roe. They will not be entirely wrong to do so. But, you know, as with a lot of judicial nominations, this is a person of diverse substance, who, you know, will inevitably be more complicated and is more complicated than the sort of parody Cartoon Version well get presented in the confirmation process. Phillip, whats the demonstrates move . The democrats dont have a lot of moves. The republicans have this tiny majority in the senate. We saw with the Gorsuch Nomination mcconnell threw out the filibuster to approve the Supreme Court justice. That may be enough. The but since gerald fords nomination theres no occasion in which a Supreme Court nominee has received no votes from the opposing party. Theres always people who cross the line. Obviously well be watching senators collins and murkowski to see how they come out particularly on the issue of roe v. Wade. By the way, really quickly, just let me insert here, that things have gotten so bad over the past decade or so, its hard to believe that it wasnt so long ago that Ruth Bader Ginsberg got over 90 votes. That was the standard. Its a shame we cant get back to that standard. If you look at fdr, his nominations were by voice vote. Obviously that was a Democratic Senate for the most part. Youre right. Theres been this increased partisanship important, larization. The gap between democrats and republicans on gorsuch was wider than anybody including bo rx. If there are democrats who cross over, again i think if collins and murkowski are able to support him democrats may do so. Well have to see. If republicans support him then democrats do have a tough choice. Do we want joe manchin, hide die heitkamp to put their seats in danger by throwing themselves on voting against an extremely popular pick in those three states. To phils point, democrats are in a near impossible position here with what they do. But the republicans, one of the most surprising things actually not that surprising when you think about it, is the fact that donald trump has used the Supreme Court appointment powers to really seize control, firm control of the base of his party. The shadows of past republican president s and nominees, start with Dwight Eisenhower and early warren, but spectre brennan and david sutter, specifically his shadow hangs over republican aopponentees. This one and this president has seized firm control of his party. The republicans can be very surprised on how this justice acts. Lets not forget, donald trump picked him not for a legacy, not for his writings, but through the lens of will this justice be on my side. Will he have my back . And that was the number one credential. It is shocking he picked someone so close to the bush administration, because we know that the president is pretty petty when it comes to that kind of thing. Except for the fact in 2009 he said that a president should not be indicted. Thats what he thought was in his best interest. Thats the one writing, the one thing that he has said that is in President Trumps best interest. So the republicans he printed it out and put it on his wall in wall paper in the white house. He did that as barack obama was taking office. So, i mean, obviously it was something maybe he learned over time from working on the clinton impeachment, what have you, or the investigation. We dont know. All i know is i think republicans are really, you know, from what they are saying we want the republican courts. They may be in a very different situation when they start looking at donald trump. Given that writing, and when kavanugh wrote it, nina, is it a legitimate question to bring up your earlier point to ask whether given the fact that there are legitimate questions and a special counsel investigation going on right now with indictments and guilty pleas to ask kavanugh join the confirmation hearings whether or not he would recuse himself from an issue about whether or not a president could be indicted . Is that legitimate . Its legitimate to ask it but i think under the rules i could be wrong, but i think under the rules just because you write an opinion piece doesnt mean you have to recuse yourself and to be fair in that law review article he seems to suggest that this should all happen by statute, that the congress should pass a statute to immunize president s from criminal prosecution and civil suits while they are in office. However, its not entirely clear that its only by statute that he thinks that and who knows. Donald trump has made a lot of people reconsider their views over a lot of president ial power, and, you know, im sure Brett Kavanuagh is thrilled to be the nominee and grateful to donald trump but once he gets on the court the question is what is the accountability of a president if you were to find serious evidence of malfeasance . Right. Benjamin, because you know this nominee, could you comment on democrats predicting that hes going to be a rightwing stooge for donald trump, that hes going to be extreme on one issue after another, one senator said, i heard being a woman success criminalized. Chances are good, not that you can put any justice over another justice, and make predictions, but just as roberts surprises in the Affordable Care act and Justice Kennedy and oconnor surprised many who were against them during their nomination process, isnt kavanugh the sort of judge and the sort of thinker that is not going to be bound strictly to ideology, most likely surprise many of those that are now condemning him . So look, there will be a lot of surprises. Look, i think that he is certainly a genuine conservative. And i wouldnt sit here and say, you know, this is going to be a david sutter character or, you know, urge liberals to, you know, to be complacent about this from their point of view because, you know, kavanugh is what trump thinks he is. He has spent a great deal of time with a lot of different ideas and as his record shows he is somebody who is more than capable of thinking out of the box, and hes certainly not a rigid idealologue. I have no doubt that you are correct there will be some surprises. I dont think they will be surprises on the big thematic 54 nature of the court. So to the extent that people think this will move the court to the right, i think they are almost certainly correct about that. And to the extent that thats the way you think about it as a sort of block vote question, you know i cant say Brett Kavanuagh is going to be on the court what Anthony Kennedy is going to be. What is the most important question to you . I start with the assumption elections matter and that if you elect republicans who promise to appoint conservative judges, that youre going get conservative judges. And so i dont start with the idea that a judicial confirmation is an opportunity to relitigate the 2016 election. So i start with the question of whats the quality of the conservative involved . Whats the quality of the individual involved . And whats the temperament and mind of the person involved . And along those axis i see nothing not to like about Brett Kavanaugh. I say that as somebody both who have spent an enormous amount of time with his work over the years because we because his work areas and mine have oddly overlapped in a lot of ways. And also just as somebody who knows him very well. So i, you know, i think if you invest too much in the judicial confirmation question and say, you know, this is about the aggregate direction of the court, theres nothing theres no argument for a liberal that Brett Kavanaugh is a good idea. So, been gentleman american, nina, thank you both for being on this morning. Great having you. Well jump to our next guest. Joining us from capitol hill, James Lankford from oklahoma. Good to see you. Senator, so whats your reaction to the president s selection of Brett Kavanaugh . I think its a positive reaction from me. Lets go through the process and do the rest of the background work what youre doing morning. Everyone around the country will do for two months. All of us in the senate will go through the process of evaluating every opinion hes written. Lets figure out who he is. Its a serious decision. Lets walk through process. Any immediate concerns come to mind from anything youve read, anything youve seen . No, not any immediate concerns. What im looking forward is two months about talking about the role of the constitution and the role of the court. Is the court all about having another legislature that can kind of pick what the law, what they want to it say or are they really a group thats bound by the law and bound by the constitution to determine heres what it says and if we change it lets go through the legislative process to do that. Thats a key aspect of that national conversation. Some folks will have a prefer rerns they wish the law said something and want a judge to say what they wish it says. Others will say lets focus on what the law actually says. Senator lankford, i want to turn the subject to the nato summit. As the president got aboard air force one he tweeted a couple of things. Most recent nato countries must pay more, United States must pay less. Very unfair. A theme and a point hes made over and over again. Do you have concerns about the president of the United States taking this approach and being confrontational with our allies as he enters the summit . Im not concerned about that initially. Quite frankly weve seen nato allies step up and say hes right we havent paid enough. Nato has kicked in quite a bit more in the last year and a half. Realize this is not a new issue. Eisenhower made statements about natural jobs kennedy made statements about nato, nixon. Theres a long historic process on United States pushing on nato allies saying you need to step up and meet your commitments. You would agree, senator, that relationship between the United States and some of our western allies, germany, france, the uk has been strained under President Trump would you not . Absolutely, i would. Hes pushing them in a way they dont like and pushing them in a financial area theyve not done for decades. They will step up their financial obligations for nato. You talking about tariffs when you say youre concerned . Well tariffs is a whole different issue. Quite frankly meeting their nato obligations for the International Defense what were doing in nato is important. But i would like to see us be able to solve the tariff issues. One of the prime issues that folks in oklahoma talked to me about last week when i was traveling around the state, people in agriculture are concerned about tariffs and the direction were going dealing with tariffs because they want to make sure we stay top trade. Are they being hurt, senator . Are they being hurt by the tariffs . Theres quite a bit of uncertain. They are putting seed in the ground right now and dont know if they can ship out. Individuals are losing money right now because they are being undercut and if our allies, whether it be mexico or canada or in europe or in asia, if they go find other markets thats very difficult to win back. Can i ask you quickly to follow up on the nato question. Attached to that is the president s relationship with Vladimir Putin. Are you uncomfortable with him talking to Vladimir Putin alone without any american representatives . Are you uncomfortable by his relationship with Vladimir Putin in anyway . I dont know what his relationship is. I know they talked on the phone several times. I dont know how much of a relationship is that. Thats his role to be able to interact with foreign leaders and Foreign Policy. He has an exceptionally different style. Thats the understatement of the day, meeting with kim jongun facetoface was very antit antithetical. We should actually be strong in those conversations. They did mess with our elections in 2016. They are not our friend in world powers. They are trying to undercut western influence. We need to Pay Attention that. Senator, another topic, youre in the Homeland Security committee, if you were to call Homeland Security today and demand a list of children who have been separated from their parents indicating where they are in this country and where the parents are, could you get a definitive list today i did not but that wouldnt be a list we would ever give out. We dont give out a list of where foster children are located whether its a state or federal government. Can they provide a list . Do they have it . Yes, they do. I spoke as recently have you seen it . I have not seen it nor have i asked for that list. Quite frankly i dont need a list. I need to know do they know. One of the difficulties they have is some of the parents and adults that brought these children across the border are now saying authors not my kids and walking away it from. Those kids will be placed in foster care. The parents are deport pandemic the parents i assume will come make a second trip without their children to try to cross the border illegally to catch up with them later. This is more complicated than it looks. They have a couple of parents that have done background check on and had criminal convictions whether its rape, child abuse. Do we put that adult back with that children. Definitely a tough situation. But it does not appear that there was a plan in place to reunite these kids and document them and process them in a way. I mean were hearing reports, senator, with all due respect that there are children under 5, up to 50, who they cannot find the parents and they are not able to reunite them. You said on the 24th on msnbc we know where every single child is. That these are career people at hhs and dhs and that it will be absolutely possible to connect them with their parents or the relative they came with. Can you really say that . I can. I feel very confident about these. These are not political appointe appointees. I had a push back there was no plan to reunite them. Hhs responsibility is not reuniting its to take care of the children. The challenge we had with unaccompanied minors going back two 2014 they were placed in the care of a relative here in the United States. Then that relative often, they were also illegally present in the United States. They would then leave and not show up for a court date. Thats created this under President Trumps policy there was no plan to reunite these kids. I dont take it that way. I dont nene be unkind, mika, but hhs role is to provide them care, know where they are and dhs process is walking through the prosecutions for these adults to figure out if they qualify for asylum. If so they are reunited. If not they are deported. The challenge that they were never filing an reconnect, this was not the United States taking children away and saying were going to put them in foster care because you crossed our border we wont to allow to you have your children back. Hhs has one responsibility, dhs has another. Neither has a plan to he unite them. They are reuniting. They are trying to. There isnt a specific plan to reunite them and some are in question now because they have been separated. And theres a question as to whether they would of being reunited because theres no plan to reunite them. I disagrees with statement. Theres no plan. This is not the United States taking children away with no plan to ever give them back to their parents. Some of those individuals are not their parents. Some of those individuals were traffickers claiming to be their parents. So they are doing dna tests to evaluate are these really relatives. If they are not relative were not going place them with someone who is not a relative. Some adults are saying we dont want to take these children we want to be deported and well start all over again. This time it will be easier to travel a month long through mexico with a child. Well catch up with them later. Its a complicated situation to work through reconnecting. Theres 102 of those individuals that are 4 years old or younger. They reconnected half of them. The other half they are trying to determine if they are a relative. Senator James Lankford, as always, thank you for coming on the show to talk about judge kavanaugh. That was actually at the end of the day the easy part. I wish any of this is easy. Its all complicated stuff but we should do it the right way. Its all very complicated. Thank you very much for being with us as always. So phillip a couple of times you were shake being your head there. One thing, he is exactly right, is its extraordinarily complicated. It was complicated for the bush administration, it was complicated for the obama administration. They wrung their hands what to do. Some people if they think they will get a better break if they have a child with them, will come to the United States that way. And so its complicated now. There are three things that i think are worth adding to conte contexturalize what the senator said. They instituted this policy as an effort to be a deterrent which i think is important to r remember. There are two things that the senator said which was inaccurate. There was a statement, department of justice had to go to a court yesterday and say heres the status of these kids to be returned to their parents by today by tuesday. They said of the 102 there was a kid who they didnt know where the parents were. Its a case there are kids who they dont know what that connection is to their parents. Thats a group of 102 kids. No plan for it. There may be as many as 3,000 kids. Potentially there being dozens of kids. So there may be dozens of kids where they dont know who the parents are or they dont know where the parents are. Could be either. Both. Kids cant speak. These are kids under 5. Third point i would raise is this idea of the traffickers, something thats been raised by many people. Theres data that was provided to me by the data point of Homeland Security. Less than 1 of people who they have found come to the border with a child who wasnt their own. These kids are coming to the border with their parents. There are cases which can be used to frame this as being toxic for the children. Most of these cases are parents with kids seeking asylum. Just to keep things in perspective, when you hear the argument that this is being done to stop the flow, and senator lankford didnt say this, in general ms13 gang members coming to the United States out of 330,000 or so of people that came to the United States illegally, Something Like 24 were gang members. A couple of dozen. Very, very small amount. Lets go back to capitol hill now and talk to senator leader of the United States Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer of new york. Senator, always good to talk to you. Good morning. Good to be back. Well just throw the softball to the senator over the plate for the first pitch and then follow up with maybe some of the pitches that you yankees have had trouble hitting the plate. Heres a pitch straight over the plate that david price might pitch to you, which is what do you think about the pick . What do you think about judge kavanaugh . Well, look, President Trump is fulfilling his Campaign Promises with a nomination of judge kavanaugh. He said in his campaign he would repeal roe. He would send it back to the states. And he said in his campaign he would repeal aca with things very precious to the American People like maintaining preexisting conditions, and he has now accomplished that. Hes had two groups vet these nominees. One is the Federalist Society led by leonard leo. Its a certainty that anyone on that list will vote to repeal roe. We have the heritage foundation, which have dedicated can i stop you on that point. I would like to finish. I want to go point by point. You cant say its a certainty, can you, that Brett Kavanaugh will overturn roe when most of us said it would be a certainty when Justice Roberts who overturn the Affordable Care act. You never know exactly how those we republicans, as a former republican i find you never know which direction they are going to go. Look i sure wouldnt bet on leonard leos hand pick list to keep roe. The other is the heritage foundation. They have dedicated their existence to repealing aca, pulling the government out of the health care. The president promised that in his campaign as well. So these are two issues broadly popular with the American People. One is reproductive rights, keeping health care particularly preexisting conditions. Ill oppose this nominee with everything i got and i would make one other point particularly for you guys. Which is this you are worried about President Trumps overreach. So am i. This nominee has stood more both, certainly before he became a judge for president ial overreach. Hes said the president shouldnt be investigated. Hes gone so far to say a president , if he declares a law unconstitutional doesnt have to obey it. How does he react if mueller needs a subpoena, if mueller needs some other action . For all these reasons this man should not be on the bench and i believe if we can prove these two points to the American People that he will repeal roe and womens reproductive freedom that well repeal aca, and the right to preexisting conditions or the right to protect preexisting conditions, that well get a majority in the senate to vote against him. I know its an uphill fight but they said we couldnt do it with health care and we did. I understand that, and isnt it also fair to say, senator, this nominee is here because democrats lost the election . Voters in 2016, they were looking for conservative judges. And they worked towards this. Republicans got what they want. They won. Here we are. I guess my question is what fight do you really sniegt do we look forward the midterms and try to find a message and try to find a unifying set of leaders, or we going to fight an impossible fight right now because democrats lost . I dont believe its an impossible fight. They said that with aca. I believe that if the American People rise up and weve seen lots of that in the last few days, we can win this fight, and i would make one other point. The number one issue for our party from the red states to the purple states, to the blue states is health care. Particularly preexisting conditions, protecting them. Which is wildly popular and necessary in the reddest of states. This court battle highlights that. So this actually may help us in the midterms. Any Time Health Care is highlighted democrats win. Senator, your task right now seems to be centered today robertson trying defeat this nomination of judge kavanaugh to the court. How do you balance that fight with the idea of keeping tester, manchin, donnelly, heitkamp in the United States senate . How do you balance that . As i said in those States Health care is a very important issue. As is in maine, as it is in alaska. Obviously we cant win this fight unless we get a republican. But i do believe, if the American People come to believe this court would overturn womens reproductive freedom, and the aca, well get a majority of votes. Obviously it would have to be from both parties. Senator schumer, its willie geist. Do you believe judge kavanaugh is an extremist . I believe he is far, farright on so many issues. The ones ive mentioned and particularly alarming is, of course, the one about president ial power at a time when we have a president who just routinely overreaches and doesnt respect rule of law. But i also on gun rights, on environmental rights, on lgbtq rights hes way, way to the right of the American People. Hes not a mainstream judge. And thats why the Federalist Society and the heritage fujs groups that are not in the mainstream have chosen him, have preselected him. If donald trump chose somebody off the list we might be in a different situation. But the fact that the president campaigned on these things and created his own litmus tests and then the fact that he couldnt let two groups that we he hadment strongly believed in these two things this is a a an extreme nominee. Do you believe pump picked judge kavanaugh because of his views on president ial power and his position in that law review power saying president s should not be subject to prosecution while in office . I certainly believe he was the judge probably of the 25. They all would repeal roe. All repeal aca. On this issue the mueller issue which came up ever the vetting by these two groups, hes probably the most extreme and it wouldnt surprise me if that was very important to donald trump, knowing donald trump and i have no proof. Do you think he didnt inquire about this either directly or indirectly . Knowing donald trump. What do you think . I told you what i think. So this idea of my dear friend joe that hes a moderate, on the issue you care most about hes not even close to a moderate. First of all, i never said avenues moderate. I know. Im trying to push you over, joe. You were trying to push a little bit. All im saying, im just warning everybody, again, republicans as a former republican i can tell you i spent a generation being surprised by what justices that were painted as rightwing lunatics ended up doing with Sandra Day Oconnor or sutter or Justice Kennedy. You have the opposite. You have judges who said they would call balls and strikes like judge roberts who led his court to create citizens united, probably the worst decision in a generation, letting dark money flow into politics. He also upheld the Affordable Care act. On a very narrow basis. Now that we have the mandate law change i dont think well stick with that either. I dont think judge roberts has called balls and strikes. I dont think judge gorsuch has called balls and strikes. These justices have been far more to the right on the bench than they talked about in their hearings. Im going call a timeout. The president just threat white house. Hes heading to the nato summit and he made a few comments. They were a couple of minutes long. Senator, do you want to stay and listen with us. And respond . All right, sure. Okay. Take a look. Well, its going to be an interesting time in the uk and it certainly going to be an interesting time with nato. Nato has not treated us fairly but i think well work something out. We pay far too much and they pay far too little. Well work it out and all countries will be happy. The uk, thats a situation thats been going on for a long time. So i have nato, i have the uk, which is in somewhat turmoil, and i have putin. Frankly putin may tebzyest of them all. Who would think . Who would think . The uk certainly has a lot of things going on. Have you talked to theresa may . I have not. But Boris Johnson is a friend of mine. Very nice notice. Very supportive. Maybe ill speak to him when i get over there. Ive always liked Boris Johnson. Should theresa may remain in power . Thats up to the people. Thats up to the people not up to me. None nato, about a half hour ago [ inaudible ] we do have a lot of allies but we cannot be taken advantage of. Were being taken advantage of by the European Union. We lost 151 billion last year on trade. On top of that we spend at least 70 for nato and, frankly, it helps them a lot more than it helps us. Well see what happens. We have a long beautiful week. Ill say also, last night was an incredible evening. Brett kavanaugh has gotten rave reviews. Rave reviews. Actually from both sides. And i think its going to be a beautiful thing to watch over the next month. Hes gotten rave reviews. [ inaudible ] i really cant say right now. As far as im concerned a competitor. Competitor. I think getting along with russia, getting along with china, getting along with others is a good thing not a bad thing. I said that many times for many years. Well see. Were meeting with Vladimir Putin on monday. Well see how that goes. On north korea [ inaudible ] they didnt give it. I have it for him. They didnt give it. But it will be given at a certain period. I actually do [ inaudible ] i actually do have a little gift for him but youll find out what that gift is when i give it. Mr. President [ inaudible ] no, i havent. I really havent. We havent discussed. Mr. President [ inaudible ] i have a solution. Tell people not to come to our country illegally. Thats the solution. Dont come to our country illegally. Come like other people do, come legally. Mr. President [ inaudible ] im sthang very simply. We have laws, we have borders. Dont come to our country illegally. Its not a good thing. As far as i. C. E. Is concerned, the people that are fighting i. C. E. , its a disgrace. These people go into harms way. Nobody under greater danger than the people from i. C. E. What they do to ms13 and everything else, so we want to support i. C. E. , not do what the democrats are doing. Democrats want open borders and they dont mind crime. We want no crime and we want borders where borders mean something. And, remember this, without borders, you do not have a country. Thank you everybody. All right. That was donald trump. First of all, why dont we start at the end. I want to talk about his outrageous comment regarding Vladimir Putin. But we might as well talk about democrats quote, want open borders and dont mind crime. That would be, obviously, Chuck Schumer is shocked, bill de blasio now presiding over the safest new york city since the 1950s. Right. You know his comments are absurd. They are not based on any fact at all. They are totally divisive. They dont mean anything. Democrats propose lets take our gang of eight bill. Bipartisan. Four democrats, four republicans. We put in that bill every democrat voted for it, 40 billion on the border. More people on the border than weve ever had before. Drones, which are so good they can tell the difference between a deer and a person crossing the border. Sensors. It was the toughest border measure ever down far more effective. Why didnt that pass . It didnt pass it passed the senate with 69 votes. And then the hard right tea party which donald trump seems to embrace in the house told paul ryan he would be dead meat as speaker if he went for it. It nerve went anywhere thoins. That bill which was balanced provided long difficult but real path to citizenship for the 11 million, took care of the dreamers, brought new people into this country for jobs we need whether ph. D. Or pick the crops had overwhelming support. Donald trump has chosen to embrace a narrow antiimmigrant group and has stopped all progress. So i want to talk about the putin comments. He said who would have thought putin twoebz the easiest meetil other than nato allies or uk allies. This is the same Vladimir Putin who invade crimea, who invade georgia, whose fingerprints are all over the poisoning of a british citizen and the killing of a british citizen on british soil. And apologies for none of that whatsoever. What is your position on the president of the United States suggesting that he has hes got the easiest relationship with Vladimir Putin . Well, you know, everyone wonders why the president is so nice to this scoundrel, this bully, this breaker of so many laws, International Laws and human rights. One wonders about that, and is it related to the russia investigation and everything else. It is a disgrace. I got to tell you something, joe. I am really worried about the president sitting alone in a room with Vladimir Putin. When he sat in a room with xi, when he sat in a room of kim jongun, no good came of any of that. Im worried that the word on the president s lips would be yes to anything putin says. I dont think he should be in the room alone with him, and i hope the people around him will argue against him being there because you never know what he will promise putin. By the way, h. R. Mcmaster quoted while he was still in the white house saying, why does this guy think he can be a putin friend . Why would anybody want to be putins friend . Thats right. Thats right. And senator schumer raises a legitimate issue. The president of the United States in the room alone with putin without a note taker, a standard no note taker here. On another topic, the elections are a little more than 90 days away. What is the democracy rejoinder or reply to the president s very simple statement he just made it again dont come to this country illegally, it is not a good thing. That resonates i think out in the country. What is the democrats reply to that . Or response is we should pass something close to comprehensive immigration reform. When you layout what was in the bill and we can modify it to adopt it to the new times 78 of the American People, a majority of republicans are for it. There is a path to citizenship, you know, which the right wing, Rush Limbaugh calls amnesty, but those 11 million would have to work, pay back taxes, pay a fine, admit wrong doing, learn english and go to the back of the line before they became citizens. It is overwhelmingly popular. We can solve this problem, but the president chooses to make it a political issue. I daresay it is not going to be as successful as he thinks when the governor of virginia, the candidate, gillespie tried it. It didnt work in virginia. We are finding throughout the country people care far more about their health care that President Trump is taking away than this is issue. They care about this issue. They want strong borders, but they dont really believe what trump just always says rhetorically, except his small base. His base is shrinking. The amount of republicans is shrinking. They still like him, but it is not enough to win elections. Susan dale . You just mentioned health care, senator, and i would like to bring it back to new york, your home state. As we know through aggressive reporting, we have seen hundreds of children exposed to lead paint in new york city housing authorities. The mayor, de blasio, a fellow democrat of yours, has basically been found out one lie after next. Today we have four democratic members of congress from new york saying they want federal intervention. What do you have to say about this problem and what solutions can you offer at the federal level . It is just awful that these Young Children by gnawing on window sills, whatever else, which had the paint that came in before lead was abolished, and we should do everything we can to help these kids. We should do everything we can to get lead out of new york housing. Do you hold mayor de blasio responsible at this point . At this point im not going to point fingers of blame. I say lets solve the problem. It has been a long time in the making. I tried to get money at the federal level to undo lead stuff and i was thwarted by colleagues on the other side of the aisle, i was helped by some. We should be all hands on deck to solve the problem quickly. Senator Chuck Schumer, thank you. Thanks for rolling with us. Thanks for staying with us. We greatly appreciate it. No gym. You know what is on the gym, all of the democrats and republicans, msnbc. They all watch it. They get on the bike angry, they get to burn off some of the anger. Great to have you on. Take care. Before you go, it is incredible race in the al east. Of course, the sox are up by three but it can be the yankees up by three at the end of august. This is about as good as it gets. Yes, it is. These are two of the greatest teams i have ever seen, and, thank god, my yankees instead of drafting 30year olds and paying them 10 million, have a young group they brought up through the ranks. I once told mr. Steinbrenner not hal, the old man. Hals doing a great job, too. But when you have 30yearold millionaires on the field you will never win the series because theyre not a team. Yeah. So go yankees but i admire the red sox. I hate them and i admire them at the same time. Okay. I hate the yankees thank you, senator. And theyre a fun team. Chuck schumer, were not getting into the new york football giants. Senator, thank you. Thank you so much, senator. What are your final thoughts . So much going on right now with the inbox of this president. Sure. Well, every week seems to be astronomical, but usually theyre selfinflicted wounds. Not so this week. Yeah, no, thats true. The thing that im paying the most attention to here is what actually happens in the run up to november. How does all of this affect november . We heard the Senate Minority leader there make mention of the fact he thinks it might energize the Democratic Base. The president s base is enthusiastic about going to the polls and showing support. The democrats dont turn out as much as the republicans do. It will be interesting to see how it shapes the midterm election. I will say this about donald trump that, again, some of us get, he is more than a political candidate. Mika and i were at an airport this weekend. A kid takes off his shoes. Oh, yeah. He has trump socks on. I pointed at the kids socks and i say, hes seen outside of, you know, the coast as so much more than just a politician. It is kind of like i remember when i saw the w Bumper Sticker for reelection, you look at it and laugh. I go, thats actually thats a middle finger pointed at the press and at the washington at washington elites. It is sort of the same thing that trumps encapsulating right now. Philip, thank you very much. Coming up, Rudy Guilliani has and you cant put that on your kids socks. Rudy has been bus ooh representing the president , but not too busy apparently to give up foreign clients. We will break down that new reporting from the Washington Post. First, of all of Brett Kavanaughs legal theories, theres one in particular that may have piqued Donald Trumps interest. A 2009 article arguing that president s cannot be prosecuted. Morning joe is coming right back. Until her laptop crashed this morning. You never know what the days going to bring when youre running a small business, it might even bring a blue screen of death. Having it problems . Ask a business advisor how to get virus and spyware removal, and 24 7 tech support. Office depot now offers on demand tech support for as little as 15 a month. Right now, save 300 on our hp 2in1 laptop bundle at Office Depot Officemax anncr as you grow older, your brain naturally begins to change which may cause trouble with recall. Learning from him is great. When i can keep up anncr thankfully, prevagen helps your brain and improves memory. Dads got all the answers. Anncr prevagen is now the numberoneselling brain Health Supplement in drug stores nationwide. She outsmarts me every single time. Checkmate you wanna play again . Anncr prevagen. Healthier brain. Better life. Do you enjoy having to work with him . We have a very Good Relationship with President Trump. Nato members must finally contribute their fair share and meet their financial obligations. Keep smiling keep shining knowing you can always count on me putins fine. Hes fine. Thats what friends are for for good times and bad times ill be on your side forever more theres a special place in hell it is kind of insulting. Thats what friends are for and i never asked once what the new nato headquarters cost. Well, you cared enough for me and now theres so much more to see oh, yeah. President trump heads to europe after selecting his nominee last night to the u. S. Supreme court. He leaves the senate to battle over judge Brett Kavanaugh while nato allies brace for their own confrontations with the american commander in chief, and what a history they already have in such a short time. Welcome to morning joe. It is tuesday, july 10th. With us we have msnbc contributor mike barnacle. Former chairman of the republican National Committee, Michael Steele. And nbc News National political reporter heidi presbella is with us this morning. So a lot to talk about. Quite a late night for everybody last night watching the big announcement. We will get to the president S Supreme Court pick and his nato trip in just a moment, but quickly first, the latest gallup weekly tracking poll sos President Trumps job Approval Rating has slipped back down into double digit negative territory as 56 disapprove and 41 approve. This just three weeks after trump received the best marks since the first days of his presidency in midjune, only to have his ratings turn back in a negative direction. This was the same time period that his administrations family separation policy at the southern border came into public view. Well get to developments in that story ahead, but those numbers are really staggering. I mean really briefly, really, who could have ever imagined ripping children from their mothers breasts at the border and then lying about it. And then losing the children and saying youre going to get them back and you cant get them back and were still trying to figure out where they are, who would have guessed it would hurt the president s Approval Rating . Including this issue of separation of families, he believed his base thinks the people are breaking the law. You break the law, there are consequences for it. There have been consequences to it, and his poll numbers which he touted a up will of weeks ago as the gallup number picked up into the mid 40s, and now it is back to where it is. This is something that the republicans all have to answer for in every swing district and every district that Hillary Clinton carried that is now being held by a republican. I mean this is just a monumentally stupid, immoral and politically shortsighted approach to Border Security. You can see theres a direct overlay between donald trump started having his Administration Push a policy that ripped children from their mothers arms to his poll numbers going down. Well, the numbers are proof of the fact while he can find a potential Supreme Court justice, hes found a Supreme Court nominee, he has lost his administration and the Republican Party lost hundreds of children literally. They dont know where the children are. They cant reunite these children, these infants in some cases with parents. We are talking about children under five, i think up to 50 literally they cant find their families. Actually, between 50 and 100 children. But the lives that hang in the balance right now is up to 2,000. Again, no access. Again, no answers. Again, no process, which shows that when they put this policy in place and said they hoped that people get the message, they had no clue as to how they might be able to track these people and bring these families back together, which shows such an extreme callousness. Yes. Which shows such a lack of humanity when it comes to American Values and families. Well, thats it. American people are pretty smart and they can understand, okay, he makes a nomination, Brett Kavanaugh. What they cant understand is how do you send parents to honduras and children to new york. And leave them here. All right. Well get to that. But certainly those poll numbers are interesting. We want to get right to the Supreme Court pick this morning. Last night in a prime time announcement, the president nominated 53yearold federal Appeals Court judge Brett Kavanaugh to succeed justice Anthony Kennedy. Judge kavanaugh has impeccable credentials, unsurpassed qualifications and a proven commitment to equal justice under the law. There is no one in america more qualified for this position and no one more deserving. Tomorrow i begin meeting with members of the senate, which plays an essential role in this process. I will tell each senator that i revere the constitution. I believe that an independent judiciary is the crown jewel of our constitutional republic. If confirmed by the senate, i will keep an open mind in every case and i will always strive to preserve the constitution of the United States and the american rule of law. Kavanaugh is a graduate of Yale Law School and clerked for Justice Kennedy in 1993. He met Kenneth Starr during a Justice Department fellowship and became a key staff member when starr was the independent counsel investigating the white water and the clinton lieu ensky scandals. Kavanaugh helped write the final report to congress that laid out 11 possible grounds for impeaching president bill clinton. He later served as president george w. Bushs white House Counsel and staff secretary before he was nominated to be a federal judge in 2006. Kavanaugh was confirmed at that time by a vote of 5736. Meanwhile, a professor at Yale Law School penned an op ed in the New York Times in support of his colleagues nomination. It is entitled a liberals case for Brett Kavanaugh. He writes in part, quote, in 2016 i strongly supported Hillary Clinton for president as well as obamas nominee for the Supreme Court, judge Merrick Garland, but today it is hard to name anyone with judicial credentials as strong as those of judge kavanaugh. And he goes on, willie, to write, other than Merrick Garland and the actual people that sit on the united stateS Supreme Court, he believes kavanaugh is most qualified to sit there. Unlike said even unlike justice scalia, kavanaugh is deeply immersed in the history of the court and believes that hes about as hes as good a selection as any republican president could make. Yes. Senate democrats were going to put up a fight whoever this was. Right. We know that that fight is coming. Theyve already talked about that last night. But the truth of the matter is where there are places aggressives will disagree on guns, border and abortion, this is not a wild pick that some people were fearing. Yes. This is an imminently qualified guy. Again, you can disagree with his positions on certain issues, but this is a guy qualified for the job. This is a guy who has been supported by president bush, by jeb bush, by john mccain. Really, you know, conventional republicans, establishment republicans. Hes not a wildeyed choice, and probably smart by President Trump because he makes it difficult on democrats when they say the world is coming to an end because of hiS Supreme Court pick. Right. It does make it more difficult for democrats, mike, to paint him as a wildeyed fanatic. Yeah. Oh, absolutely. And it also puts the republican he puts the republicans, the two republicans thinking of voting against a nominee, in a very difficult position, as it does the three or four democrats thinking that they would might plausibly vote against him, too because he is such a mainstream pick. When you have john mccain, jeb bush, w and all of these people and liberal law professors from yale saying hes as good a pick as you would find other than Merrick Garland, it is hard to paint him as a wildeyed i h wildeyed ideologue. And you would have to think this appointment has given comfort to certain people. I dont think Michael Steele, the white house could ever have hoped for better optics. This man and his family, a tremendously appealing group of people. The judge himself was certainly not threatening at all in his appearance and his brief speech last night. Didnt have a mustache and beard. Remember, coming to the board problem. I dont understand the beard. I think a lot of people have trouble trusting someone that has a beard like that. Why do you have a beard like that, sir . Yeah, and judge kavanaugh can you believe a senator saying that . Talking about coaching his daughters basketball team, a tremendously appealing kick. Michael steele. He is a former altar boy so i already identify with him. That was a good moment, and the monsignor that i references a dear friend as well. So kavanaugh brings to the table a lot of boxes that will be checked for red state democrats, for a conservative base, and for this white house. It is a solid pick. His jurisprudence is one that has been noted 11 times by the Supreme Court in affirming his decisions, and so this jurist, this future Supreme Court justice brings a lot to the table. The politics of this though is what is the most striking for me in that listening to the wailing and the gnashing of teeth, the democrats have no one to blame but themselvess. You know, mcc mcconnell calld their bluff in executing the nuclear opening with garland and others along the way and the reality is coming home to roost for them. They dont have the numbers. The only recourse outside of the protests, the marches and the grandstanding is to take the senate, because thats the only way this changes. Thats not on the shortterm horizon, maybe longer term, but this will be a judicial desert for democrats for quite sometime. Still ahead on morning joe, judge kavanaugh once wrote that sitting president s should be exempt from criminal prosecution. That could be music to Donald Trumps ears. Actually, that is music to trump towers ears. Definitely is. Thats why he selected him. Well talk about that straight ahead. First, bill karins with a check on the forecast. Good morning. We are talking about a lot of heat across the country and keeping an eye on what could be a hurricane, still 200 miles off from north carolina, still a Tropical Storm but it is showing signs of moving. It likely will become Hurricane Chris later on today. It moves parallel to the coastline and then out to see. Were not going to deal with winds or waves from chris. Also our friends in montana into north dakota, about half a Million People with a chance of severe weather. This is where we could see an isolated tornado later today. The forecast, as we mention, still very warm. It is the peak of our summer, you would expect it to be like this. 93 in new york. Boston at 93. Denver is still having a hot summer at 98. Salt lake city at 98 also. It looks like the heat will continue into many areas. The northeast will get some relief. You go from the 90s to the 80s which will feel enjoyable but it doesnt make it into the mid atlantic. We have 94 on wednesday in minneapolis. We continue with our hot summer. By the way, we found out that june was the third warmest june we have ever recorded in our country. We leave you with this shot. Beautiful new york city on a hot summer morning. You are watching morning joe. Well be right back. Directv gives you more for your thing. If youve been waiting for a sign to quit cable, then heres some signs. It came from the toaster. Now you can quit cable. Switch to directv and now get a 100 reward card. More for your quitting cable thing. Thats our thing. Call 1 800 directv. Until her laptop crashed this morning. Her salon was booked for weeks, having it problems . Ask a business advisor how to get on demand tech support for as little as 15 a month. Right now, save 300 on our hp 2in1 laptop bundle at Office Depot Officemax jimmys gotten used to his whole yup, hes gone noseblind. Odors. He thinks it smells fine, but his mom smells this. Luckily for all your hardtowash fabrics. Theres febreze fabric refresher. Febreze doesnt just mask, it eliminates odors youve. Gone noseblind to. And try Febreze Unstopables for fabric. With up to twice the fresh scent power, youll want to try it. Again and again and maybe just one more time. Indulge in irresistible freshness. Febreze unstopables. Breathe happy. And now for the rings. Im a fouryearold ring bearer with a bad habit of swallowing stuff. Still wont eat my broccoli, though. And if you dont have the right overage, you could be paying for that pricey love band yourself. So get an allstate agent, and be better protected from mayhem. Like me. Can a ring bearer get a snack around here . This wifi is fast. I know i know i know i know when did brian move back in . Brians back . He doesnt get my room. Hes only going to be here for like a week. Like a month, tops. Oh boy. Wifi fast enough for the whole family is simple, easy, awesome. In many cultures, young men would stay with their families until their 40s. My judicial philosophy is straightforward. A judge must be independent and must interpret the law, not make the law. A judge must interpret statutes as written, and a judge must interpret the constitution as written, informed by history and tradition and precedent. Judge kavanaughs views surrounding investigations of a sitting president are drawing renewed attention this morning. In a 2009 article in the minnesota law review, kavanaugh suggested that president s be exempt from criminal investigations and civil suits while in office. Huh. He wrote congress should consider passing a law, quote, exempting a president while in office from criminal prosecution and investigation, including from questioning by criminal prosecutors or defense counsel. Kavanaugh went on to write, quote, we should not burden a sitting president with civil suits, criminal investigations or criminal prosecutions. The president s job is difficult enough as it is. Some Top Democrats seizing on that in relation to the on going russia probe. He picked the one guy who has specifically written that a president , in fact, should not be the subject of a criminal investigation, which the president is right now. So this seems to be of all of the people the most selfserving person he could choose in order to protect himself from this criminal investigation. Hes a political animal. He has been for a big part of the formative years of his career. And so he thinks of this, i think, as, wow, we need to make sure that the United States of america stays safe by protecting the president from investigation, from indictment, from prosecution. Thats what troubles me about the whole picture here. Lets be really clear here. Judge kavanaugh, if hes going to be a scourge of liberals, he wrote the law review article in 2009, at the dawn of the obama administration. So it would be the least selfserving thing for a conservative jurist to write, which i think actually speaks, given the hysteria surrounding Barack Obamas presidency, i think for a conservative jurist to write that actually speaks to the content of the judges character. But, heidi, there is no doubt that donald trump and his people have admitted to members of the press already that they did know about this article and it was discussed inside the white house. Make no mistake of it that this is the reason i mean i will make no mistake of it, everybody else draw their own conclusion. You can narrow it down. You can boil it down. Donald trump is the most selfserving, selfinterested politician of certainly our time thats ever been in the white house. Thats why he has selected judge kavanaugh, because of this single 2009 article and why he upset a lot of conservatives along the way, to protect himself. The question is, will the senate, will those questioning kavanaugh ask him, will they really go after this line of questioning here and ask him if he will recuse himself on any questions pertaining to the indictment of donald trump since there is a possibility that thats why he got this seat, if he gets it . It can speak to the content of kavanaughs character and it can also at the same time speak to Donald Trumps motivations. Thats why it will absolutely be a major line of questioning and it may be one of the reasons why, despite all of the impeccable credentials we just discussed, Brett Kavanaugh was not one of the two judges who mcconnell recommended donald trump pick, who would be easiest to get through the senate. If you look at the democrats messaging last night, they absolutely are shifting into high gear on this issue of russia. You have a number of democrats saying even last night before kavanaughs announcement came out that he should, in fact, recuse himself. This will be now two judges that this president will have put on the court who could potentially in any number of scenarios, in terms of constitutional questions about whether he pardons himself, whether he fires mueller, where he is subpoenaed, could end in a constitutional question before this court. But look more broadly at the democratic messaging. It is not just about russia. The democrats are saying, look at the paper trail here. There are a number of points of attack, whether it is the health care law, whether it is russia, or whether it is roe. This judge has a long paper trail. He just came into the cross hairs on the issue of abortion just last fall when it came pertained to an immigrant teenager who was trying to seek an abortion. His ruling was he tried to delay that. He was overruled, and in his dissent he wrote he bashed the decision and used some of the trigger words used by the activist antiabortion crowd in terms of abortion on demand. So there are a number of flash points here that i think are going to make it hard on democrats, but that is where you look for the first cracks as to those red state democrats. Coming up on morning joe, not only did President Trump congratulate Vladimir Putin on his election, but he bad mouthed members of his own administration while speaking with the russian leader. We will preview their facetoface meeting which bizarrely will take place without any other american officials in the room. Its the ford summer sales event and now is the best time to buy. And check out the allnew ecosport. Protect those who matter most, and make the summer go right with ford, americas bestselling brand. Now during the ford summer sales event, get 0 financing for 60 months on a huge selection of suvs. And for the First Time Ever get 0 financing for 60 months plus 1,000 ford bonus cash on the 2018 ecosport. Plus 1,000 ford bonus cash my mom washes the dishes. Before she puts them in the dishwasher. So what does the dishwasher do . New cascade platinum does the work for you, prewashing and removing stuckon foods, the first time. Wow, thats clean new cascade platinum. Metastatic Breast Cancer is relentless, but im relentless too. Mbc doesnt take a day off, and neither will i. And i treat my mbc with new everyday verzenio the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. In fact, verzenio is a cdk4 6 inhibitor for postmenopausal women with hr , her2 mbc, approved, with hormonal therapy, as an everyday treatment for a relentless disease. Verzenio an ai is proven to help women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. Diarrhea is common, may be severe, and may cause dehydration or infection. Before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection. Verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. Serious liver problems can occur. Symptoms may include tiredness, loss of appetite, stomach pain, and bleeding or bruising more easily than normal. Blood clots that can lead to death have also occurred. Talk to your doctor right away if you notice pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain or rapid breathing or heart rate. Tell your doctor if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. Common side effects include nausea, infections, low red and white blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. Im relentless. And my doctor and i choose to treat my mbc with verzenio. Be relentless. Ask your doctor about everyday verzenio. We are back now with breaking news. Mission accomplished in thailand. The final four boys and their 25yearold soccer coach have been freed from that cave in thailand after 18 days. Theyre now under quarantine in the hospital. Two of the boys are being treated for mild knew moania. There was one loss of life as you remember in this ordeal. Former Thai Navy Seal died on friday. Again, all 12 boys and their coach safe and recovering in the hospital. Considering the circumstances, theyre in remarkable physical condition were told. Great news. Now to reporting on President Trumps personal attorney Rudy Guilliani. Ethics experts are telling the Washington Post that he could be running afoul of federal ethics laws since he is working for foreign clients while serving on the president s legal team. Reading from the papers article he said, guilliani said in recent interviews with the Washington Post that he is working with clients in brazil and colombia, among other countries, as well as delivering paid speeches from a controversial iranian dissident group. He has never registered with the Justice Department on behalf of his overseas clients, asserting it is not necessary because he does not directly lobby the u. S. Government and is not charging trump for his services. Guillianis decision to continue representing foreign entities also departs from Standard Practice for president ial attorneys who in the past have generally sought to sever any ties that could create conflicts with their client in the white house. I have never lobbied him on anything, guilliani said. I dont represent Foreign Government in front of the u. S. Government. Ive never registered to lobby. But lobbying experts told the post that some of guillianis work for overseas clients is likely to require registration under the Foreign Agent registration act. Susan, where do we begin here . I mean it also feels like when guilliani speaks for the president hes not necessarily doing the best bidding for the president. He seems to be tipping the president s hand every step of the way. Having said that, where is this fair . Is it a fair argument that there may be something inappropriate here . We have to find out what the facts are. It would be interesting to see if guillianis firm registered as a lobbyist, maybe not him specifically, and if any of those were holdovers from his previous law firm. But thats what happens when you become a madefortv lawyer for the president. Right. And youre not really doing the law aspect of as much as the pr aspect. I think sometimes you forget the lines that are drawn and what you are supposed to be responsible for. All right. Well, i mean, rudy does what rudy wants to do. I mean should we be surprised, mike . Im not. No. Again, you look at what this president is doing. Hes i mean theres so many conflicts financially, and weve known there was going to be for a long time. No, we should not be surprised. In a way, it is sad because he is so diminished the reputation that was wellearned in the aftermath of september 11th here in new york city, and the demise of that is long gone. Now it is just seemingly a lust to be on camera to stay relevant. And Rudy Guilliani has existed in this space for the last few months of, i dont really work at the white house, im President Trumps friend, im a loyal adviser, im an attorney at times, im a fixer at other times. Think he views himself as immune from the other conflict of interest questions that would arise if you were, in fact, working at the white house. All right. President trump is headed to brussels right now amid what many see as a defining moment for nato. Ahead we will talk about another defining moment involving nato. This one from back in 1983. How a military exercise nearly led to nuclear war with the soviet union. Morning joe will be back in a moment. This is a story about mail and packages. And its also a story about people. People who rely on us every day to deliver their dreams theyre handing us more than mail theyre handing us their business and while we make more ecommerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, we never forget. That your business is our business the United States postal service. Priority you after a scratch so small rocket you could fix it with a pen. How about using that pen to sign up for new insurance instead . For drivers with accident forgiveness, Liberty Mutual wont raise their rates because of their first accident. Liberty. Liberty. Liberty. Liberty. I saw my leg did not look right. I landed. I was just finishing a ride. I felt this awful pain in my chest. I had a pe blood clot in my lung. I was scared. I had a dvt blood clot. Having one really puts you in danger of having another. My doctor and i chose xarelto®. Xarelto®. To help keep me protected. Xarelto® is a latestgeneration blood thinner thats. Proven to treat and reduce the risk of dvt or pe blood clots from happening again. In clinical studies, almost 98 of patients on xarelto® did not experience another dvt or pe. Xarelto® works differently. Warfarin interferes with at least 6 of your bodys natural bloodclotting factors. Xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor. Dont stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of blood clots. While taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. Xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. It may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. Get help right away for unexpected bleeding or unusual bruising. Do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. Before starting, tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures and any kidney or liver problems. Learn all you can. To help protect yourself from another dvt or pe. Talk to your doctor about xarelto®. Are you ready to take your then you need xfinity xfi. . A more powerful way to stay connected. It gives you super fast speeds for all your devices, provides the most wifi coverage for your home, and lets you control your network with the xfi app. Its the ultimate wifi experience. Xfinity xfi, simple, easy, awesome. Nato has not treated us fairly but i think well work something out. We pay far too much and they pay far too little, but we will work it out and all countries will be happy. In the uk, thats a situation that has been going on for a long time. So i have nato, i have the uk, which has been somewhat turmoil, and i have putin. Frankly, putin may be the easiest of them all. Who would think . Who would think . Actually, let me answer that one for you. Nobody would think that except you. Just like in 2015 nobody would have said that Vladimir Putin was a great leader, he was a strong leader, except you. So the more things change, the more they stay the same. That leaves us wondering again a question weve been asking all along what does he have. What does Vladimir Putin have on donald trump. We will find out. We know he has something. We will find out at some point, but, my god, when we find out it is going to be something. I know. That was President Trump moments ago leaving the white house en route to europe. When asked whether Vladimir Putin was a friend or a foe, the president answered that he really cant say right now adding, quote, as far as im concerned he is a competitor. We are also learning more about the private phone calls between the two leaders. New york times reports that during a march conversation putin complained that several Trump Administration officials tried to prevent the call from happening, to which trump respond, quote, those are stupid people, you shouldnt listen to them. He is talking about his National Security staff, by the way. That was the same call where trump reportedly congratulated putin on his election victory, despite a clear warning from his top aides in his briefing notes in all caps, do not congratulate. Should we explain why thats not a good idea, to congratulate putin on his election win . Yeah, yeah. It is not just that his staff didnt want him to do it. It is that it has negative consequences. Yeah, that he obviously doesnt care anything about. Anyway joining us now adjunct professor at usc and contributor at the week mark evander, author of the new book the brink. Which is out today. Thanks for okay. Congratulations on the book. Thank you so much. Good to be here. Mark, i was up way too late last night. I did the old man thing of falling asleep early and waking up just in time to see that at 12 09 a. M. Your book was at the top of the charts, not that you were paying attention to that. But, first of all, congratulations, at least on the first nine minutes of the release. Thank you. Secondly, you know, weve heard of actually mika has heard the story, i heard the story from dr. Brzezinski about how he sat in his living room, certainly Nuclear Annihilation was coming, didnt even wake the kids up because he was sure what do you do in that situation . Yeah, he was sure that everybody was about to be obliterated, but you tell a different story. This not only happened during the carter administration, it happened in 1983. Tell us about it. You know, we like to think of Nuclear Crises as Major Political gamesmanship, the cuban missile crisis being one. Most of the Nuclear Crises we have faced have been cases where the Nuclear Command control system has broken down, intelligence has failed, and leaders have not been able to take the measure of leaders on the other side. In fact, when you were just watching, it occurs to me that the soviet leader has had no idea what to make of Ronald Reagan and russian leaders know exactly what to make of donald trump. It is a very eery comparison. Thats why tension ran so high in 1983, because Ronald Reagan was a unique political leader soviet leaders had never seen before. U. S. Nuclear doctrine was changing to the point where the u. S. Had the technology not only to survive a Nuclear First strike, but to end a nuclear war on their own terms. This war game in particular that the book goes through in some detail, was very highly detailed and realistic. It involved the release of natos Nuclear Weapons from u. S. Control to the german luftwafa who would use them. For the first time the exercise had a degree of realism and it was held in an environment where there had been in 1983 a series of very scary incidents. Take each individually, not really that important, but together they create a Snowball Effect of fear. Thats what happened. Well, and there was that fear for the soviets towards Ronald Reagan which, of course, the americans shared for quite sometime. But talk about what happened, how that fear led specifically on that particular date to possible nuclear showdown. Well, look, some just has to do with the relative status of the two countries. The soviets were in decline and the United States wasnt, and Ronald Reagan was fairly clear about what he wanted to do. He wanted to end the cold war on his terms, and to russian leaders particularly those leaders who were very old and dying, which was most of them at that period, considering their mortality, they felt they had to hedge. Remember, from that period there was a shootdown of the korean airliner that strayed into soviet airspace. There was an icbm launch that turned out to be just blips on a satellite radar screen. There were secret changes to nato communication procedures, the soviets constantly trying to sabotage these procedures, and it got to a point where if youre the soviet leadership the only thing you can do if you really think theres a chance that the other side is going to launch some sort of attack, whether it is in europe, from nato or whether it is an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile attack is to attack first. As crazy as that sounds, thats what almost happened. Marc, it is wily geist. How close were we to nuclear war . The alarm goes off in the soviet union, they roll their icbms out to launch position on Something Like a threeminute warning i think it was. Yeah. At what point was it stopped . Not only that, they disbursed their Nuclear Weapons. They sent kgb officers down into the icbm, the holes where they would be launched from because, of course, if the missile operators refused a launch orders, kgb officers would shoot them. We know they were afraid because this was not this information was not available to u. S. Intelligence at the time. So thats pretty close. Thats, you know, a couple of minutes away from a misunderstanding or a miscommunication leading to nuclear catastrophe. So we were close. Mark, you know, one of the back stories here i think it is alluded to, more than alluded to in your book is the role that Ronald Reagan, Casper Weinberger and the american budget process played in the demise of the soviet union. I mean did we not end up through that decade basically outspending them and them trying to keep up with us, spending themselves into oblivion . Something like 70 of what the soviets spent throughout this period was on defense and in trying to keep up with the United States, and certainly they had more troops and more tanks, but the u. S. Had a qualitative edge in technology that essentially kept the russians ten years behind where the u. S. Was. There is some debate among historians about how much u. S. Spending actually pressured the soviet union into collapse. Byebye the time th byebye but by the time there was a soviet leader willing to talk to wrr aRonald Reagan and e time Ronald Reagan understood what the soviet fears were, there was a match ready to be made. I think thats one lesson that if the current president is inclined to learn lessons no perhaps y perhaps he can take from Ronald Reagan. As you know, Ronald Reagan read a lot throughout his entire history. Probably read more books on the soviet union than i did in writing this book, and was constantly trying to understand precisely what it was the soviets were afraid of and really questioning people in a way that demonstrated an empathy that i dont think people give him credit for. I do think meaningfully contributed to an enormous reduction in the number of Nuclear Weapons pointed at the United States. Susan, go ahead. And with reagan, we understood the shared values i think with the west. Absolutely. When you look forward today and we see, you know, this president s only value is dollars and cents and thats how he gauges our whole relationship with nato. Can you kind much explain the difference or the relation someplace with nato and the importance of shared values beyond dollars and krebts . Look, there are a couple of things that nato wants donald trump to tell to Vladimir Putin. He wants trump to pressure putin into ending the siege. He wants trump to pressure putin to make peace in eastern ukraine, and he wants trump to very strongly commit to putin that the u. S. Stands fully behind its commitment to support nato in the event of any military confrontation. And will donald trump do that or will he make constant noises throughout the summit that if you dont pay your bills, were not going to support you . In fact, why do we need nato, why not dissolve nato. Shared values. More than whatever Nuclear Deterrent the u. S. Has in europe, theres about 150 tactical weapons, shared values and the commitment to respond on behalf of nato if one country is attacked is by far the strongest deterrent to any sort of russian attack on any of its former satellite states. Thats what nato wants to hear from donald trump. Thats what they want donald trump to pressure void over, and theres no indication at all thats what donald trump is going to do. Kay bailey hutchinsons protestations aside. The book is the brink, president reagan and the nuclear war scare of 1983. Mark evander, thank you so much and congratulations on the book. My pleasure. President trump doesnt appear worried by the drastically different views held by washington and pyongyang regarding the latest highlevel negotiations with north korea. Yesterday trump tweeted, quote, i have confidence that kim jongun will honor the contract we signed and, even more importantly, our handshake. We agreed to the denuclearization of north korea. I dont actually, i dont think anybody ever agreed to that, mike barnacle. Interrupting a trump tweet midstream. A signed contract . When did donald trump actually honor signed contracts . Or a handshake. The thing is there was never an agreement in the north koreans mind to do that. Again, i retweeted a National Review article written im sorry. I wish i could remember the authors names but he is an a. E. I. Fellow. Just saying that this was going to happen, predicting this several weeks ago. Said, we got nothing for it. Duped. That they got everything that they needed, so expect this to unravel. That smart people have been predicting this and conservatives for sometime. The statement they signed at the conclusion of their summit, i mean, was basically, hey, it was nice meeting you. Right. That was it. Kim jongun did not meet with secretary of state mike pompeo during the secretarys latest visit last week. He was very busy. Did you hear where he was . He was at a potato factory or something. North korean state media has revealed kim instead visited a rural potato farm. How would you like to be secretary of state, look at that picture. United states secretary of state flies to north korea, which of course they would have walked over hot coals three months ago to meet the u. S. Secretary of state there. Ill tell you and after they get exactly what they want from the United States and from donald trump, who they duped into giving a press conference, he decides to go pick potatoes instead of meeting with the u. S. Secretary of state. Ill tell you why, because mike pompeo would have given him a hard time and would have actually required a real meeting. So why do that when you can meet with trump publicly and make a fool again. Of the president of the United States. Willie, look at this picture. He got everything he wanted from donald trump. Hes hanging out in the fields with potato farmers now because what does he want to give up . He got the north korean flag and the United States flag next to each other. And the president to shake his hand. Theres nothing else he wants to get. Hes gone to the mountain top. He had the leader of the free world, President Trump, at his side. Why would he sit down with mike pompeo . He would rather be in summer whites picking potatoes. By the way, can we have those again . You know, i have seen that before in nantucket. Yeah, i cant pull that off. No. I have a suit like that. Donny deutsch tried actually at his southampton potato farm. This is not good, guys. Our next guest says theres a straightforward way to help the neediest americans, give them money. We will dig into that theory ahead on morning joe. Raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens brown paper packages tied up with strings these are a few of my favorite things these are a few of my favorite things booking a flight doesnt have to be expensive. Just go to priceline. Its the best place to book a flight a few days before my trip and still save up to 40 . Just tap and go. For the best savings on flights, go to priceline. And now for the rings. Im a fouryearold ring bearer with a bad habit of swallowing stuff. Still wont eat my broccoli, though. And if you dont have the right overage, you could be paying for that pricey love band yourself. So get an allstate agent, and be better protected from mayhem. Like me. Can a ring bearer get a snack around here . Until her laptop crashed this morning. Her salon was booked for weeks, having it problems . Ask a business advisor how to get on demand tech support for as little as 15 a month. Right now, save 300 on our hp 2in1 laptop bundle at Office Depot Officemax let us place a forearm on the income of every family in america. That so blight the lives of welfare children today. But let us also establish an Effective Work incentive, an Effective Work requirement. Let us provide the means by which more can help themselves. This shall be our goal. Wow. Nearly 50 years ago, president nixon wanted a basic income for every family in america. And while nixons proposal never came to pass, that idea has not gone away. Joining us now, contributing editor at the atlantic, annie lowrey. How a universal basic income would end poverty, revolutionize work. Congratulations on the book. Thank you so much for having me here. On this very quiet, no news morning. Exactly. There really is nothing to talk about at all. So thank you for coming to fill some space for us. So north korea, potato picking and nato summits and Supreme Court justices aside, lets talk about your book and talk about your theory, heard there Richard Nixon talking about it 50 years ago, actually guaranteeing a minimum wage. A minimum income actually is the best way to alleviate poverty. This is an idea we really know a lot about. In some ways, its salient now because republicans are quietly but very effectively remaking the safety net to become more contingent on work, more contingent on circumstance and harder to use. Three things like attaching work requirements to medicaid. We know perfectly well whats thats going to do. Its going to drop people off the rolls. Its likely to increase poverty. Thats one bucket of arguments. The other reason you hear about this idea a lot is just this persistent concern that at so many point robots are going to take all of our jobs and, you know, all three of us will be replaced with an artificial intelligence. Which is another set of concerns. What are we going to do if that happens . So its kind of those two strands of ideas that have really come to the fore and kept this very old idea and very blue sky, you know, i dont think this is going to happen any time soon but really kept it relevant. Annie, i am from the school where i believe i firmly believe that being born poor in america is the hardest job anyone can ever have. Just being poor in america. That said, where is this money going to come from . So theres its a very good question. If you just wanted to give everybody in the United States 500 or 1,000 a month on top of everything that we already do, obviously that would be quite expensive. But the United States is actually a pretty lowtax country compared to its rich country peers. We just pass aed a tax reform bl that took another 1 trillion and change off the table. Its not impossible to think about ways to finance this. Thats a note that, you know, a lot of social scientists have looked at this and basically said if we got rid of programs that didnt work and went to cash programs that did work, it wouldnt necessarily cost anything. You could really eliminate poverty by just kind of shifting money around. Although at some point probably to be more effective and to help working poor and lower income families in general, you would want to be putting some more money on the table. Its willie geist. Good to see you this morning. There are pilot programs as you know under way in finland, for example, kenya, canada. Relatively small groups. I think finlands trying it on 2,000 people who are unemployed. Do we have a sense just in those small study groups how this is working . Absolutely. We know a lot about how this is working from all of those pilots that you discussed. Theres actually so many that are ongoing in the United States too. And theres a few things that we know. So one is that it probably does stop some people from working but those people tend to be the parents of Young Children. They tend to be people who stay in school. They tend to be Unemployed People who decide to take a little bit longer looking for a job. Its not necessarily a bad thing that so many folks would leave the labor force or maybe work a little bit less. Its also the issue of people taking care of a parent or taking care of a kid. We know that cash is really effective at ending poverty. Where work requirements are really ineffective. Adding work requirements doesnt make people get to work any faster. We actually have a lot of evidence on that. We also know that peoples Consumption Patterns dont change much so it doesnt seem like theyre just wasting the money. Theres concern that people would just spend it on cigarettes or alcohol or just fritter it away and it wouldnt help them and we know thats not true as well. Susan. How do you actually make this a reality . We know we live in a pretty divisive country right now. Besides just saying republicans are wrong on certain issues, how do you get everybody on board . Because this would take a tremendous effort, bipartisan effort, to accomplish. Absolutely. So i think that the idea of doing kind of a full fat big ubi is probably quite far outside the window now. But there are ways you can help make the safety net more effective, less contingent. Theres been some talk about doing a universal cash grant for poor children. Which there would probably be no better money that the country could spend. We have a very high Child Poverty rate which has a terrible downstream effect in terms of incarceration rates, issues with health, issues with housing and income attainment later on. The idea of expanding the earned income tax credit or providing a jobs guarantee or just making programs simpler that i think are actually sort of in the spirit of this idea but are not as radical. All right. The book is give people money. Annie, thank you so much. Thafrgs for being on the show this morning. Thanks so much for squeezing me in, guys. Welcome back. Final thoughts, joe. The big final thought today, more breaking news, Billy Dee Williams coming back for star wars 9. Youve been texting with your son again. Andrew passed that information along to me. Thats right up there with potato picking in north korea. Final thoughts . We had Chuck Schumer on. Hes ready for a fight on this judge kavanaugh, on this nominee. Its going to be tough to get joe manchin, joe tester, democrats, to peel off for this one. I just cant get over the fact that we have a president of the United States who is in collusion with Vladimir Putin about disrupting and destroying the European Union. So happy to see those kids and coach out in thailand. Its a great news story. It was the only thing keeping donald trump out of every news story. Yep. I think also the Foreign Policy on the Foreign Policy front, this president has been duped and mocked by dictators, but i think the separation policy will be really what this president is remembered for in terms of complete and total incompetence and inhumanity. I think it will linger for a long time. That does it for us this morning. Stephanie ruhle picks up the coverage right now. Thanks mi s mika. Thanks, joe. Hi there, im stephanie ruhle. And we begin this morning with breaking news