ripping away 50 years of constitutional protection. it's supposed to be for emergencies so like aliens come to earth and biden is like we should stop them and the court is like we have to decide really quickly. that's what it's supposed to be for. there was no emergency here. roe v wade was a 50, 60-year-old law. there was no emergency reason for them to throw out. for them to throw out that law because they don't know the law, they're the supreme court. we literally have them so they can make these decisions and they were like this is too complicated so we'll throw away 50 years of law. that is craven. that's trying to do something while avoiding the new york times headline supreme court overturned roe v wade. that's what they are trying to get away with. all these people, texas abortion law, severely weakens. that's what they wanted people to say. not the truth which is that roe
Related Keywords
New York Times Headline Supreme Court , Emergency , Protection , Earth , Emergencies , Aliens , 50 , Law , Supreme Court , Emergency Reason , Roev Wade , 60 , Something , Decisions , Craven , People , Truth , Texas Abortion Law ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.