We could go on about a but we sought so you know what it was like. Thats the overview. As a political matter, the main thing we learned last night is that it was a mistake to spend so much time focusing on joe bidens mental decline. This, its real, yes joe biden is fading, but on stage last night biden did not seem senile. If you tuned in expecting him to forget his own name, and honestly, we did expect that, you may have been surprised by how precise some of his answers were. Not all of them, but enough of them. Trump isnt going to win this race by calling joe biden senile. Nor, by the way is joe biden going to win this race by calling donald trump a racist, as he repeatedly did last night. That slander didnt work four years ago, it will not work now. Because personal attacks rarely work. They rarely determine election outcomes. Thats obvious if you look atta the results, but its easy to forget it and many did. What matters, always, to voters anyway, iser what you do, not wt you say. Right now many would like to see someone defend the country. America has never been under fiercer attack than it is right now. Virtually all of the attackers come from the domestic left. They are democrats, biden voters. I am the Democratic Party joe biden reminded us last night. Thats true. It should be enough to keep trump in office. The Democratic Party has become more radical than any major party in the history of the country. Its leaders plan to dismantle our system, the system are founders created centuries ago, a system that countless other countries have envied s so much they copied. Democrats want to do away with it. They want to abolish the Electoral College, they are trying to end traditional election day voting. They intend to invalidate the filibuster and guaranteeid permanent control of the housene and senate by admitting d. C. And puerto rico into the union. We will have 52 states and the democrats will be in charge forever. That is their plan. We are not making it up, theyve set it. The scariest of all, they are planning to hijack the Supreme Court by spending the number of justices. Leading democrats of openly endorsed this idea. Its not a small change. It would end our third branch ot government. The judiciary would cease dispensing justice. It would instead become an instrument of partisan power politics wielded exclusively on behalf of one party. How would you like to live in a country like that . Its horrifying. Joe biden was asked about this last night. Heres how it went. Are you willing to tell the American People tonight whether or not you will support either ending the filibuster or packing the court . Whatever position i take on that that will become the issue. The issue is the American People should speak. T you should go out and vote. You are in voting now, vote and let your senators know how strongly you feel. Vote now. Make sure you in fact let people know, your senators. Im not going to answer the question because the question is the question is. The question will you shut up man . Tucker so there are a couple of things to note about the exchanger just saw. Nobody forced biden to answer the question. Key question. That was frustrating to watch. But it was also easy to interpret what he meant. Of course joe biden plans to pack the Supreme Court. Otherwise he would have denied it. Or packing is not popular with the public. Nearly 70 of americans oppose it. That includes more than half of all registered democrats. But the extremist to now run the Democratic Party are demanding it and joe biden will follow their lead. Thats what radicalism looks like. Anything that stands between you and the power you seek, you destroy. Even if its the worlds or oldestn constitutional court, which our Supreme Court is. We should be afraid of people who are willing to do things like that but in b joe bidens case we dont seem to be afraidi and that leads to Something Else that we learned last night at the debate. Tone is everything. Biden all but admitted on stage that he plans to tear down our system, but he did it in a calm, this is your captain speaking voice. Biden seemed almost reassuring, even as he hinted at revolution. Donald trump, by contrast, defended our system, the system that most people in this country support. Nothing from set on stage was radical. Virtually nothing he ever says was radical, at least if you compare it to Public Opinion p polling on the issues. Its his tone that rattles people. Trump could make a wine list sound menacing. So in the end, amazingly, tragically, many people watching last night may have concluded that joe biden is the stable, study alternative. They concluded this even as e joe biden suggested that he plans to change their lives, their country permanently and forever in ways they wont like. Its quite a trick. The illusion of reasonableness. Barack obama was the master of this. Biden learned well. And so he continued last night. Watch joe biden explained that actually, hes the America First candidate. It would create an additional 1 trillion in Economic Growth because it would be about buying american. That we have to we are going to make this federal government spent 600 billion here on every thing from ships to steal, to buildings and the like. And under my proposal, we are going to make sure that every penny of that has to be made by a company in america. Tucker with dr. Buy american, buy american, says the man who welcomed china into the World Trade Organization and has beeno sucking up assiduously to its leaders ever sent to fight the billionaire says the man Whose Campaign was funded by oligarchs on wall street and silicon valley. Joe biden stole donald trump lines. It was remarkable. How was biden able to do that . Well, the Trump Campaign should ruminate on that question. Trumps advisors inlaws are telling him to brag about the number of people he has let out whenison, this at a time our crime rate is exploding and people are dying as a result of it. Joe bidens advisors plan to met many more people out ofad priso, but theyre not bragging about it on stage. No, they are hiding it. Instead, they use the debate to talk up a buy American Program they will never implement. What we learn here is the biden people are very serious about v politics. They know what the public wantse even if they claim to ignore it if they are elected. And of course theyre willing to say anything. That helps. Thats another thing we learned last night. We learned that whats up ramsey is now the single greatest threat to our country. E how can that be, you ask . Well it turns out that mobs of White Supremacists just burn down minneapolis in kenosha. They trashed portland and seattle. They shot cops in louisville. D the torch 20s, they cleaned out the nike store. Dy they destroyed public monuments in atlanta and san francisco. They defaced War Memorials in washington. They looted macys in midtown chicago. Also in the city of chicago, White Supremacists murdered hundreds of africanamericans and everywhere they went these right wing bigots spraypainted racist graffiti on buildings and threatened sleeping citizens in their homes. The whites are from assisted this. If you saw it all on tv. It was bewildering to listen to all of this. It wasnt just factually untrue, no, it was insane. It was crazier than any conspiracy that google has ever banned. Yet they are now demanding that you believe it and if you dont believe it, they are going to punish you. So why are they doing that . Thats a good question. Its also an ominous sign. If they can make you accept a lie that ridiculous, what are they plan to doo next . Maybe someone will ask that question in the next debate. Victor davis hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute in one of the rare figures in ia community whose not only deeply knowledgeable, but wise and we are grateful to have them on to make to assess what we saw last night of the debate. Professor, thanks so much for coming on, what did you make of it . Thank you. Well, you know, i think there was two debates, there was the optics and the atmospherics watching that experience and then if you read the transcript later on what was actually said, its quite different. It reminded me of the 60s, kennedynixon. Everybody thought that kennedy won who watched it. He was calm and poised, for what he actually said was trivial compared to nixon, who looked sort of angry and tired. So trump was abrasive, he interrupted and biden seems although he slurred, you actually look what biden said, hes a captive of the left come as you pointed out, he cant answer Court Packing and new green deal or the violence in the streets because hes made this devils bargain with the left and that constraints them, where trump is free to say whatever he wants because hes not trying to delude anybody. What you see is what you get. So fracking, great, forced management, yes, law and order, absolutely. In the past, in the present, it in the future. And i think that hurt him that he tried to interrupt because he had the better message. First 5 minutes was wonderful. He was calm, but i think he got the idea that he was going to rattle biden and he interruptedn biden if he didnt understand d that when biden is free to speak, thats when he goes off the train of thought and think its ridiculous, and thats why when he does these canned interviews, all of these o newspaper and visual people in media, pundits, they interrupt him to help them out, because they have these little thought bits and that sort of stitch them together so when he lost his train of thought or something, h everybody thought while trump interrupted him, but if he hadnt interrupted him, we would have been short that he said nonsense. I would say, if i could be a little bit more controversial that i dont like the format. This gotcha question. Its like getting on the horse and spurring them and then saying youre going to have 2 minutes to block and then youre going to stop immediately. If youre going to incite a candidate, then what do you expect . By that i mean, when you ask this question, didnt you what charlottesville say this, when herl didnt say it, and then he gets angry and says oh, 2 minutes, stop. Mi and you got to be absolutely symmetrical, so if youre going to mention charlottesville, very controversial topic, i think misrepresent it, then you got to go to biden say whats the most recent controversial racial what did you mean by you and black . We didnt hear that. Or if youre going to say you want to accept the election, and whats going to be the counterpart . It was going like you guys didnt yard Administration Try to disrupt the t transition and really cause almost a coup and not accept the 2016 election . And so there wasnt that symmetry and i think that marred the debate and what was the strategic analysis of it . I guess what happened is you were right about that, that a a lot of people who got your reassuring message from trump, t that he is the protector of prosperity and law and order were turned off by the interruption and maybe he lost the swing vote. It may be on the other hand he revved up his base, the deplorable scummy irredeemables that have not come up to vote that might get revved up and he might have weakened some of biden a space that said wait a minute, you are flopping and flipping all over and you made a bargain with us that youreth supposed to get this radical agenda through. And so its hard to tell, and also that depends on the polls, tucker. In 2016, the mainstream polls were wrong. And i mean, the wall street journal, nbc, you name it. And they had trump losing by quite a lot. Now theyre saying the same thing and we dont know whether they are wrong again or suddenly theyre going to be right him and the outlier polls were right in 2016 and now they are considered wrong because trump is within the margin of error. In places like rasmussen, state level and emerson. So what that means is trump either had it raw and he is ready for debate number two where president s usually do better in the second debate, or who was behind and he had to make this up and we are going to find out very quickly, but i think theres going to be a sense on the Biden Campaign that theyre going to i dont think they can get out of it but theyre going to try to float balloons and say, you know what, this was just so much, it was so combative, do we really want to go through this again . Of thinking that they have their lead maintained, ihi dont think they increased it and they will think lets find a different venue because i dont know if that suggests they dont want to go through this again and therefore they are afraid of it or they feel that they squeaked by and they dont want to risk edtheir success. Tucker i want to ask you with the minute we have left, since you have studied political systems goingu back thousands of years, to the classical era, the idea of changing the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, filibusters a newer innovation, but adding to the size of the union in order to pack the house and senate. I mean, put this into some context for us. These are not moderate proposals. These seem like blows against the system itself. They are expected. Thats what the french revolution was about. It wasnt about changing government or making a Constitutional Republic auto monarchy, itmo was changing even the dating system and even the days of the week or months. And destroying the church. The left does not have a message that people will embrace contrary to human nature, this idea that we are all going to share and everyone is going to be equal by a result, nobody wants it, so the democrats realize that that message is not going to go anywhere. We are not back to 40 hour work week disability, Social Security that people embrace. What they are saying is we got to change the demographic with open borders, after 150 years, weve just got to get weve got to get, rid of the nine person Supreme Court or after 233 years, we got to get rid of the Electoral College or with got to get rid of 190 year filibuster, 62 year tradition of 50 states because we cant win onwe our current agenda so we ae going to change the rule. Thats typical throughout history of the left and doesnt require a majority and i think youre right about that, if its done in a particular fashion and people dont speak out against it, whether it was in france or whether it was in russia or almost during the 60s, passivity fuels it and empowers it. People have to say, you know what, we are not going to chang the rule. You play within the parameters within the field, youre not going to go outside the sidelines and thats very important. Thats one reason joe biden would never answer the question. And it was frustrating for trump. I just wish that he had focused on not more, but i can see what he was frustrated and i dont think the moderator really helped biden to account to answer those questions. And thats with the fight was about. And we will see what happens in a second debate, but i have aco feeling that it didnt changein for now whatever the polls have recorded before. And you can argue about what they recorded, but i think we are going to go into the second debate with a sense of desperation on both candidates. Theyve got to change the polls, the opinion on what their attitude about what they really say are. Tucker i strongly agree with you that at this moment bravery is the vital virtue, Clear Thinking people telling the truth. We wont survive without it. Professor, thank you. Yeah. Thank you. Tucker so you heard mention of Critical Race Theory during the debate last night. Joe biden didnt seem to understand what that is or maybe he doesnt want to admit he knows. We will tell you what it is and what he got wrong after the break. Tucker police say they found the men who ambushed two l. A. County sheriffs deputies in compton, california, on september 12th of this year. They charged a convicted felon, charged with attempted murder for shooting the cops multiple times as they sat in their squad car near a rail. Authorities already had him in custody for an unrelated shooting and a carjacking before they realized he also might be connected to that ambush on the police. The attack on the deputies, by the way, was totally unprovoked, but it was not unforeseen. One Police Captain said his motive was that he obviously hits policeman and wants them dead. Where do you think he got that idea . Its not just the usual poison from blm, it is in fact the official message of the Democratic Party platform, that police should be hated. Have you read the platform . If you do, you will learn the police make it almost impossible for africanamericans to go outside because they could be murdered by the police. Thats not true, but thats the Democratic Party is saying. As of today, joe bidens running mate Kamala Harris has not apologized. Still, for promoting the minnesota freedom fun. Thats the group that bailed out trying to killf a police officer. She has not even been asked about it. Last nights debate joe biden was never asked about his own staffers contribute into that bail fund. If the media continue to give joe biden and Kamala Harris pass, can they really act surprised the next time the next murray decides to shoot the Police Officers after being told that they are oppressors . By the way, theres a lot about Kamala Harris that we are going to be taking a close look at on the show for the rest of the weekend and the next week. Dont miss that. During last nights debate, joe biden when prompted described Critical Race Theory is totally innocuous. Not a big deal. Its about racial sensitivity, he said, and beasley, who was against that . Not us, not anyone. Heres what he said. The fact is that there is racial insensitivity, people have to be made aware of what other people feel like, what insults them, what is demeaning to them. Its important that people know. Many people dont want to hurt other peoples feelings, but it makes a big difference. Tucker this is the most polite country on the face of the earth. If you traveled internationally, that. Ow maybe japan. Certainly is the most polite westerns country in the world. No american wantswe to hurt anyones feelings on purpose. So Critical Race Theory is not designed to solve hurt feelings, its not about racial sensitivity. No, its the kind of racial supremacy. It teaches that some people are morally tainted because of the color of their skin, the way they were born. Thats the definition of racism. Its poison, we should fight against it with everything we have. Its wrong, its immoral, contrary to the christian message, but its infiltrated our government. , taxpayerfunded trainers told white male employees to write letters of apology to women and people of color, which women and people of color . All women and people of color. Presumably that he sinned against all of them by who they are. Grotesque. Some agencies are teaching employees that punctuality and diligence are associated with whiteness and that meritocracy is morallyey wrong. What kind of damage is this doing to our country long term, to our kids . Its grotesque. So the white house executive order this month ended these trainings in the federal government, it was long overdue. Probably wont be enough, but its worth considering whats really going on. Peter is a commission on the u. S. Civil rights commission, he joins us today. Thanks so much for coming on tonight. So what i heard the former Vice President say, Critical Race Theory is just a form of racial sensitivity. I thought that maybe the most misleading thing ive heard in a long time. Its galactic we divorced from and its fear demott clear that he has absolutely no idea whatso going on in our school, also in a public agencies, and are corporations, academia, everywhere. Critical race theory has been infiltrating these institutions for the last three decades and it reached kind of a crescendo and thats why the president acted and he needed to act. It got to the point where it was out of control. You just described was going on. Ive seen Critical Race Theory training, ive seen in many corporations, in many public agencies, the things you just described where whites are harangued for being white and are told that they are inherently racist. They are explicitly told that, its astonishing. Iits a violation of title vi d title vii in the 19 for 60 1964 civil rights act. Also in her academic institutions. It is toxic, as youve described, its unamerican, but what it does is, along with its edge on the 1619 projects, it undermines the foundation of america, attacks the foundation for americanmade institutions, presumes every institution, system, was formulated and constructed to preserve white [indiscernible]. In some of these trainings, it requests of sort commands that employees forswear or abandon all of the traits youvef mentioned with respect to discipline, punctuality,y, accuracy, linoleum thinking. The obviousness of that is blacks and people of color arent that. Its one of the most amazingly racist things imaginable. It is so condescending, its an extraordinary its extraordinary to me that employees sitting there, white, black, whatever, would sit there, they got to because they are employees, right . They dont want to lose their jobs that they take this toxic poison that is inherently racist and absurd on its face. So the executive order that the president signed is frankly fairly anodyne, but it needed to be done and it prohibits public agencies, federal agencies, federal contractors and federal grantees fromm having these type of toxic trainings. Its pretty clear it is simply a restatement of title vi, title vii, and requires these people to have that in their federal contracts. Its long overdue and what we are seeing in the streets over the last four months is thena natural result of this kind of toxic training that began k12 in a more probably watereddown sense, but has continued throughout not only upper academia, but in the workplace. Its a natural and by the way, there are at least two studies that show that these kinds of trainings actually have the reverse effect of what they are intended to do. In other words, it increases racial division. Tucker of course it does and we are doing that at high volume right now and its very sad to watch. Living antidote to that, i appreciate you coming on tonight. Thank you. Thanks, tucker. Tucker didnt hear much about russia during last nights debate, thats odd because the president arbys that for vladimir putin. Whatever happened to the russia collusion story . Well actually, we had news yesterday about Hillary Clinton and how she came up with that story. We will tell you what weve learned today, the next chapter, up next. I am totally blind. And non24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. Talk to your doctor, and call 8442142424. Tucker for three years dummies like bill kristol and many others toldld you that russian agent, thats donald trump. Hes working for putin. He is sabotaging ukraine to help russia. But none of that came up at last nights debate, weirdly. Joe biden didnt seem to want to talk about impeachment or the mueller report, strange, because those were history changing moments, t remember . In fact, the only person on stage or talked about russia really was donald trump. Watch. If you look at crooked Hillary Clinton, if you look at all of the different people, there was no transition because they came after me trying to do a coup. They came after me spying on my campaign. They started from the day one and even before i won. From the day i came down the escalator, they were a disaster, a disgrace to our country and we caught them, caught them all. Weve got it all on tape and by the way, you gave the idea for the logan act against general flynn. You better take a look at that because we caught you, and a sense on president obama was sitting in the office, he knew about it too so dont only got a free transition. Tucker i dont know if you could tell from the clip we just played you, but hours before laste nights debate, we learn from declassified documents that russian intelligence determined during last cycle, 2016, but it was Hillary Clinton that came up with pushing the narrative about trump p and russia to distract from her email scandal. This was so worrisome to american intelligence officials they forwarded investigative referral about the plan to the fbi, but today, jim comey, who ran the fbi, testified he doesnt even remember that referral. How does that make sense . How does a sub source linked to russian a intelligence. Your head is throbbing, theres a reason for that. John davis has gone through all the details for years now, cofounder of the federalist, we are happy to have them on to sorted out. Hey, sean. Thanks for having me. Tucker what did we learn from comey today . It was actually a very big week as far as russiagate news. We learned it was in the Trump Campaign who colluded with russian spies to interfere in the 2016 election. We learnedn that it was actually Hillary Clintons campaign. The russians knew what she was doing, the fbi knew that they knew, james comey was even told through that investigative referral what was going on, had infiltrated Christopher Steeles network and seated us document with false information and comey today claimed he didnt know a thing about it, curious that he was running this thing from the beginning for the fbi. Tucker further evidence, as if we needed it, that whatever they areac accusing you of doing i is precisely to the letter what they are doing themselves. Irony doesnt describe it. Youre exactly right and its even bigger than that. If this isnt just a scandal about democrat projection. This is a scandal about what was a coup planned against the Incoming Administration at the highest levels and i can report here tonight that these declassifications that have come out, those werent easy to get out. There is in fact far more waiting to get out. Unfortunately it seems according to multiple choices ive talked are being blocked by cia director who herself was the main link between washington and london. The london station chief for John Brennans cra cia, where Christopher Steele was doing all this work and im told that it is gina haspel personally who was blocking continued declassification of these documents that will show the American People the truth ofct what actually happened. Tucker why are we putting up with this . They are Still Holding documents from the kennedy assassination, the Warren Commission documents. We still dont know everything there, why is that 55 years later, seven years later . They are blocking the release of so many documents. Why doesnt somebody anyone in power can do this stand up and say no, these are going public now . Thats a great question. I think one reason is someone of the people blocking these documents are likely advocated by them. Youca have these career bureaucrats whose careers may be destroyed by the facts that are within them and i think at this point we need the president , donald trump, to step in and say no more destruction obstruction, no more blocking. We need transparency and the americanicee people need to heae truth. That means letting everyone see everything that happens. So we can decide for ourselves before we vote who we actually want in charge of these agencies. Tucker you can literally shoot a cop and get charged with assault but if youre julian assange, and to effectively declassify lots of documents come up with them in the public view, they want to kill you. It just tells you a lot for their priorities. Great to see you. Thank you. Tucker after nearly 100,000 voters in thepr city of new york received mismarked absentee ballot packages, the new york city board of elections announced tuesday they plan to print and mail new absentee ballots, but remember, youre a lunatic if you question any ofio this, because, repeat after us, mail in balloting is totally secure. Got it . Justin haskins may or may not believe that. He is a Research Fellow at the harvard institute, on the show the other day but for mysterious we didnt tell mike reasons his down. We are happy to have them back. Justin, thanks for joining us. Thanks for having me. Tucker a hundred thousand mismarked ballots but we shouldnt worry at all. Shut up, conspiracy monger. I mean, this is the tip of the iceberg. 100,000 ballots, we are just supposed to ignore that there were 100,000 faulty ballots in the worst part of this was that there were widespread reports in brooklyn, the borough of brooklyn that people were receiving the ballots with thein return envelope having the wrong name printed onre it. Under new york law, if you have the wrong name printed on if the name on the absentee ballot, the signature, doesnt line up with the name on the returnp envelope, then they can throw the ballot out, so it is entirely possible that there are people who have already voted incorrectly and that there ballots could potentially be thrown out, and we are being told, no, no, no, dont worry about it, absentee balloting is totally fine. This is just the tip of the iceberg, it is going to get so much worse as we start to expand this out across the country and its going to undermine americans faith in his election and that is literally the last thing weon need at this point in time with all the chaos that weve already had this year. Tucker this is not the first epidemic we had in this country, its not the deadliest either. What are we doing in other play gears . Did we just not both . Obviously waited dangerous to vote in person, right . So how did we handle that in 1918 forye example . Look, america has a long tradition of people going in voting in person no matter what, but even if no matter what, but even if you are really, really concerned about it, there are ways to do in person balloting and have social distancing and have people Wearing Masks and why cant we have drivethrough voting . Why cant we have that were cars in thein their drivethrough and they vote and they stay in their car . They be perfectly safe because it really isnt about that, and you know that. This is about one thing and one thing only, as much doubt as possible into the selection but thats what theyve been doing all year long, why should it change now just because theres an election . Tucker so just to be onear, they are not fighting Voter Suppression . [laughs] no, i dont think thats whats going on tucker try to laugh, its also depressing. No matter what happens in t election, the reflexive faith that most of us grew up with in our system has already been shaken and theres a huge cost of that, its very sad. Justin, thanks so much. Thanks, tucker. Tucker so we heard a lot last night from joe biden about the administration and donald trump specifically bring responsible for the wuhan coronavirus. D this time by claiming that donald trump personally killed 200 million people. But he still made some pretty big claims. We will say what e they were. Next. Tucker last night, if you saw the debate, you may have noticed that joe biden blamed the sitting president for the effects of the wuhan coronavirus on the united states. He didnt explain what he wouldve done differently as president , he just declared that its a scientific certainty that mr. Donald j. Trump caused the damage, watch. 200,000 dead, as you said, over 7 million infected in the united states. We in fact have 5 4 of the worlds population, 20 of the deaths. 40,000 people a day are contracting covid. In addition to that, between 750 and an thousand people today ae dying. When he was presented with that number, he said it is what it is. It is what it is because you are who you are. Tucker it is what it is because you are who you are. In other words, the virus killed people because donald trump is mean. This from the nominee of the party ofis science. So a matter of data, what we deal with here on cable news, is there any scientific proof to the claim that donald trump could have stopped the coronavirus by being a nicer person . Dr. Marc siegel is a fox news medical contributor of course. Always on the show, always happy to have you, good to see you. Av tucker, this virus has [indiscernible] all of us and we dont need political posturing, we need to acknowledge weve been learning as it goes along. Cdc director redfield told me recently that its the mostsm transmissible, most dangerous virus he has seen in his lifetime but at the very beginning, cdc was probably underestimating it, saying that it could be contained to the state of washington. The president , as good as the information he gets and i want to point out something, the president as a businessman of the president has geared up big time in terms of the public project partnership, in terms of testing. 150 million new tests of the type that will get us rapid answers on covid19 and the vaccine. Its a disgrace how politicized thats become when in fact its the data safety monitoring board thats looking at that and if we get a vaccine before the end of the year, it will be a miracle, thats never occurred before. If theres never but criticism here. Tucker i mean, the former Vice President didnt explain what he would have done differently under the circumstances. Do you have any idea maybe what he wasid suggesting . I think we know what he wouldve done differently. During the 2009 swine flu pandemic on the president brought this up and i wrote a book about this, the former Vice President was fearmongering at the very beginning. He got the media a stir with that and then his own chief of staff said this could have been aav big disaster and they were lucky to avoid it. So we know he has a background in fearmongering and he also locked down the entire country potentially and that would cost us dearly in terms of economic, mental, and physical suffering, tucker. Tucker talk to any College Student right now, someone currently enrolled in college or a parent of a College Student and you will see what theyre doing to those kids. Dr. Siegel, great to see you. We need the country open, thank you, tucker buried tucker so the one thing that was missing from last nights debate, sorely missing, was analysis from the great mark steyn. We are going to provide that after the break. Tucker well, if you didntf catch last nights debate or dontht have access to the internet, we have some good newg for you. We hired actors and staged a reenactment of what happened, condensing it to just a few seconds. Heres what we came up with. Youre crazy. I know you are what but what am i. Speak i know you are but what i my. I know you are but what am i. I know you are but what am i. Tucker we are not going to reenact any of the postdebate analysis because they were horrible. The only analysis you really need is from a mark steyn, who s not on tv last night, but we will promise, it is worth it. Mark steyn, great to see you. Like many people, i found it terrible, but im actually more concerned that the president ial Debate Commission is so horrified by it that they now want to change the rules to make it more like the traditional, boringly, stultifyingly respectable i dont believe in the Debate Commission, i dont see why a nea in a republa couple of people you vaguely remember from the day before yesterday should have a monopoly on president ial debates. If they do change the rules, i hope the president manages to smash through them the way here did through the format last night. Tucker they are not, obviously, interested in ratings, and im not quite sure what theyre interested in. Why do you think the president ial Debate Commission i know why i didnt like last nights debate, but why are they trying to set up a microphonekilling mechanism, or whatever they are doing . Well, because they always want to over format it. Traditionally, these debates last night was very simple, but usually 90 seconds opening statements, after which the other party will have 45 seconds for rebuttal to the opening statement, followed by a 30second prerebuttal to whatever the next question is, and the whole thing is locked down and boredom. Last night, the two guys going at it directly, i dont think it particularly work for either party. I look at it in showbiz terms. Whenever you come out and do in act one, you have to do different in act two. Trump is brilliant at pit the responses, youd be in jail, only rosie odonnell. After chris wallaceme started whining trump was talking too much, trump should give him some of those 15second answers and then say, like the Climate Change thing, nobody is voting on Climate Change. Its 37th on peoples list of priorities. It wasnt on the list of original topics forna debates, which had to be issued three weeks in advance for some reason, and he should just say, look, there is a pandemic, there is a lockdown, there is looting and burning on the streets of americas cities, nobody cares about Climate Change, so i yield the balance of my time to joe biden, and he about federal subsidies for environmentally friendly window treatments, which actually happened under obama, and let joe exhaust himself, because joe cant actually fill up the time, so give him more time and let him exhaust himself. Tucker god, thats brilliant. Your first point is especially smart. Angry doesnt work. E its not effective. I remind myself come or try every night when i write my op open. Funny works better than mad. Sometimes righteous anger works. For example, i dont believe being told that youve got to condemn White Supremacy is a goodfaith question, because it implies some have been cozying upup to it. Its like stop beating your wife. That is a fair question, chris, if you also put it to the guy across the stage who actually boasted aboutld how he was ableo work with segregationist democrat senators who actually said he would do well in South Carolina because delaware is a state. You have to have some righteous anger, but you have to use it sparingly. Tucker very good advice. Not surprising. Mark steyn, great to see you tonight. Hey, thanks a lot, tucker. Tucker a quick note, Kamala Harris, of course, is running as joe bidens running mate. She could very well become our next president. Shed certainly be in charge. We dont actually know that i mh about Kamala Harris. Each day until the vp debate next week, were going to take a look at her record, get to know her and who she really is, tell you what we found, could be interesting. Will beti back tomorrow, they sw that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. Sean hannity, right now. Sean no private health insurance, executive order to eliminate guns, oh, and she sponsored in the Senate Medicare for all and the new green new deal. Tucker we are booking you for tomorrow sean but im going to watch your investigation tomorrow, look forward to it. Good show is always. Welcome to hannity. Really busy news like tonight a, a fox news alert, the president set to speak at another massive rally, tonight in minnesota. We will dip in throughout the hour, we have to get other news income as well. In the present talks about last night, you will hear it. First,t, debate one is now officially in history books. We are going to unpack this, but anyway the mob and the media never will. Last night,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.