House Economic Advisor only on Fox News Sunday. Then will President Trump sit for an interview with the special counsel . I wont let my client testify, the president of the United States, even if he wants to without those documents being produced. Chris we will talk with corey lewandowski, president pre trumps First Campaign advisor. Comments from Roseanne Barr and samantha bee sparked outrage but with very different results. We will ask our panel if theres a double standard. And our power players of the week share wisdom with the class of 2018. Alright now on Fox News Sunday. Hello again from fox news in washington. We begin with breaking news. The New York Times is the first to report a story that President Trumps legal team sent a memo to Robert Mueller in january asserting broader president ial powers. The memo, the lawyers argue the president cannot be compelled to testify and cannot obstruct justice because he has authority over all federal investigations. New lead lawyer Rudy Giuliani tells abc news, if mueller tries to subpoena us, we are going to court. Joining us in manchester, new hampshire, corey lewandowski. Is that the president of you . That he cannot be compelled to testify and that he cannot as the president , obstruct justice . I am not an attorney so i want to be very clear about this but what this memo outlines what their team has said was, if the mueller team will subpoena the president , that is something they believe is not authorized because of his position. What they are trying to do is trying to sit down and figure out if the president will sit down for an interview, tha interview will be based on a narrow scope of questions that the team is trying to negotiate. What giuliani said, if the mueller investigators decide to subpoena, they will take it to court and i believe the court will be on the president s side on the. Chris in this specific issue, it has never been adjudicated. There is a long history of the courts orderpresident to do something and president s agreeing to do it. Subpoena is a court order. Thomas jefferson, Richard Nixon had two bouts of the Supreme Court and releasing the watergate tapes. Bill clinton had two bouts of the Supreme Court when it came to testifying in the paula jones civil suit. Thats exactly right but you have to remember, the giuliani legal team is trying to negotiate with the mueller team to decide if its the right thing to have this interview and if so, they want to understand the scope of the questions. Theres the potential to avoid teams cawork together and it is determined the questions that will be asked will be relevant to an investigation to prove once and for all, there was no collusion. It sounds like what giuliani and his team are saying, you dont need to go the subpoena route but if you do, we will fight it in court. The president has offered to sit down with the investigators but he has said, they want to understand what the scope of questions will be before they sit down and do that. Chris i want to try to lower this down a little bit. Giuliani says if mueller gets a subpoena which is a court order, giuliani and the legal team will go to court. What if the court says no, mr. President , you are wrong. Is the president prepared under his understanding of his powers and the executive branch. Is he prepared to defy a court order . I dont think so and i havent spoken to the president about it. Thats a question for his legal team. I think the president respects the rule of law, theres no question about that. There is a way to avoid all this. Theres a way to avoid a constitutional issue which is working with giuliani and his legal team and the mueller investigators if they can come up to a resolution which will ask the president to sit down and have a conversation which is limited in scope. Then the team will decide if the president s willing to do this. At the end of the day, what the mueller investigators can do, they can write a report to congress and to the Justice Department and show there was no collusion between the president and the russians and thats where we are. If the president is asked to sit down and discuss this, he will say exactly that because i know it to be true. You know it to be true and the American People know there was no collusion. Chris i want to talk about another part of the memo. We should point out, this was written by the president s former legal team in january, including john dowd. Was sent to mueller. Giuliani was not part of that but he is embracing that january memo. Another part of it basically says, the president has the ability to pardon anybody he wants. I want to look back at that because the president has thinbeen busy with his pardoning this week. Dinesh desousa. He says he may part in martha stewart. It may pardon former illinois governor rod lavoievich. I think the president is sending a message. Basically, i will use the pardon power to pardon people even if there convicted of leaking or obstructing justice. If you are with me, i have your back. Chris longtime Trump Advisor Roger stone said this, it has to be a signal to mike flynn and Paul Manafort and even Robert Mueller, insight people for crimes that dont pertain to russian collusion and that is what could happen. So, are you saying, is the president saying, he can pardon anyone he wants including people that are swept up in this investigation . The constitution is very clear and the power of the president as defined by the constitution allows him to pardon anybody he wants for federal crimes. No one is talking about the pardon of the heavyweight boxing champion, jack johnson which is something the Obama Administration had a chance to do butchose not to. People want to make this a political issue. The party pardoning of Dinesh Desousa was a oneoff. A we thanny president to this point. Will he pardon the mark riches of the world, of course not. Those are personal friends of the president back then who had crimes committed against our government that were convicted. Chris if you were to pardon, and i emphasize is, pardon Michael Flynn or Paul Manafort. People that can conceivably give evidence against him, thats a lot more than mark rich. With all due respect to roger stone, i dont think he has any idea what hes talking about. This is not a sign. I dont know of the president s relationship with Dinesh Desousa. I dont think it was a strong relationship between them but he looked at that particular case, saw an injustice that was done. Which was selective enforcement by the Previous Administration a campaignfance violation. At the same violation Roseanne Barr has admitted to. Giving too much money to we havent seen the prosecuti of her for that. So the president pardoned dennis desousaon a oneoff opportunity. But never has this president sent to the best of my knowledge, hes even thinking about a pardon for mike plan or poor Paul Manafort. Chris but you are sang he could if you wanted to. Of course under the constitution, he has the power to pardon anybody. No question. Chris lets turn to spy gate. The allegation by you and others in by President Trump that the fbi inserted a spy into the campaign. Heres what President Trump said and also what republican congressman trey gowdy said after he got up has five briefing from the Justice Department and the fbi. How do you like the fact they had people infiltrating our campaign . Can you imagine . Im even more convinced the fbi did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got, and has nothing to do chris corey, thats trey gowdy. A conservative republican. He led the ben ghazi investigation and he is undercutting what the president and frankly people like you talk about when you discuss spy gate. I am very concerned what we dont know, unequivocally, is the fbi taken informant and put them in the campaign. Because i never spoke to anyone with the fbi as the mpaign manager. Never today notify me of their concerns about potential russian meddling. Never did they notify me or anyone else of a potential spy entering the campaign. Never did they notify anyone im aware of that they had those concerns. Whats more disturbing to me, theres only one campaign involved in the general election that took 5 million, hired a former spy to crte a fal dossier. That was the Clinton Campaign and it doesnt sound like they were so concerned that they put a spinto that campaign. Lective enforcemenall if it did take place, there better be accountability. Clapper says thats not the term we use. You call it what you want, when you have a paid government informant that made a lot of money trying to solicit information from a person so campaign without notifyat campaign, thats called spying. Chris one last question i want to get to because you have joined vicepresident mike tense clinical committee. Heres what President Trump is saying about democrats on the campaign trail. Remember the term, chuck and nancy. They dont want the wall. They want open borders. They are more interested in taking care of criminals than they are in taking care of you. Were going to protect your second amendmt. You will have the Second Amendment wont have the Second Amendment if the democrats take over. Chris the president called nancy pelosi the ms13 lover. Any of that, do you believe over the line for President Trump . Its a clear reminder to the American People what happens if the democrats take control of the house of representatives and nancy pelosi becomes the next speaker. Not one democratic member of the house or senate voted for the historic tax cuts. This president try to negotiate to get money for the wall and take care of these people that came to the country through no fault of their own. But the democrats didnt want to do it because eyto politicize it. The president has to remind people what is at stake and moving our country in the same direction. With the lowest unemployment for africanamericans and hispanics ever recorded. Or going back to the ways in more mo taxes. Its a clear dichotomy and i think the president is on the right track. Chris corey, thank you. Always good to talk with you. Thank you. Chris up next, we will bring in our sunday panel to discuss those hateful comments from two comedians that spark similar outrage, but very different consequences. What would you like to ask the panel about comments from Roseanne Barr and samantha bee this week . With 5 times more regions ancestrydna can pinpoint where your ancestors are from and the paths they took to a new home. Could their journey inspire yours . Order your kit at ancestrydna. Com let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your fathers immigration practices you feckless. [bleep]. Put on something tight and lowcut and tell your father to. [bleep] stop it. Chris samantha vs file comment that sparked outrage. This coming one day after Roseanne Barr tweeted a racist remark about former obama advisor, Valerie Jarrett. Its time for ourday group. Brit hume, Juan Williams and marie harf and the aforementioned guy benson. Brit, the comment by Roseanne Barr clearly hateful. The circumstances about it were more urbi because samantha bees comments were scripted, taped and run hours later by tbs. Your thts about all of this . Roseanne barrs comment was completely out of bounds and as you say, hateful. If youre trying to think of something to say about a woman that would be worse than what she said, the use of the cword , which i think is only second to the n word. Its misogynist and reduces a woman to a body part. Some people would divide as hate speech and sexist. I think the two are basically on par but whats not on par was the treatment toward Roseanne Barr and samantha bee. Vast difference. Its pretty hard to argue theres not a double standard. Chris we asked you for questions for the panel and on the subject, we got this tweet. Do networks have to respect and individuals freedom of speech or our networks responsibility and freedoms different . Marie, how do you answer . Private corporations to make decisions based on what they think is in their best business interest. We have seen a couple businesses boycott samantha bees show but that may continue or it may not. While both of these cases, they are able to say these things. They are also very much able to face consequences if they do so. It will be interesting to see if abc decides this is not in their corporate interest tbs, excuse me. I dont like the idea that we are only outraged when people we agree with our attack. We need to be outraged as a culture because of where we are in our politics on the left and the right. This is where things are and its terrible and it needs to change on both sides. Chris juan, would you agree that there is a glaring double standard . For samRoseanne Barr, you lose your show and for samantha bee, its different. I agree with what marie was saying in the sense that this culture is in a place where we use this poker language. When you think about what Roseanne Barr had to say in terms of calling Valerie Jarrett and ape, a black woman. This speaks to race in our culture. Dehumanizing people, oppression, slavery. You dont think what samantha bee is dehumanizing . I do, let me finish. Is poker and rank and unnecessary. It does not speak to the idea of tearing apart the social fabric around the most central and difficult issue in america. Race. And thats what Roseanne Barr not only did in this instance, she had done it previously with susan rice. Another obama official. Chris samantha bee has said all manner of horrible things about all manner of women working in the trump white house. One of these items speaks to tearing at the social fabric in a way that cant be undone and puts us in great danger. Therefore, its not about teams for in terms of i am a trump supporter and i will therefore support Roseanne Barr or im an obama supporter and i will support samantha bee. Thats really juvenile compared to the seriousness of whats taking place. You think about the nfl players, you think about charlottesville, i can go on. You understand they are playing two separate us as a society. I think you can defend what abc did with Roseanne Barr. I am not calling for samantha bee to be fired by tbs but i am wonderinher there will be any consequences for samantha bee aside from a few advertisers temporarily suspending their support of the program. Tbs, the only thing they said publicly is applauding samantha bee for apologizing for something she shouldnt have said. While Roseanne Barr, her tweet was totally an acceptable and racist, it was in the middle of the night. Thats a different context than samantha bees plant which were scripted, in a teleprompter. It was a comment clearly premeditated and made it through multiple layers. Chris and then was taped hours later. Wait, i want to move to another subject and that is the Russian Investigation because we do have this news of the president legal team back in january sending this memo. Brit, you and i have covered a lot of scandals and are taking a on the president s powers when it comes to obstruction of justice. Having to sit down and answer to a subpoena and pardoning. Your thoughts about it . I think obstruction of justice, the memo may be legally found in that the president has broad powers over the actions of the executive branch of which the Justice Department and special counsel is most certainly a part. The question whether hewould have to answer process , so respond to a subpoena is another. We do know the Supreme Court has ruled Richard Nixon had to produce material evidence which he ultimately did. Whether that would extend to sitting for an interview, or being called before a grand jury has never been fully adjudicated. I think the president may not be on as strong ground there arguing that. Chris marie. The letter opens interesting questions about the trump teams relationship to the truth. The letter made clear that donald trump himself dictated the statement that was given to the press about donald trump jr. s meeting with russian agents. Happened months ago. But you had one of trumps attorneys and sever standards publicly on the record saying the exact opposite. By trying to put forward a legal case, the trump team has opened themselves to more questions about whether theyre telling the truth on russia and that is a problems be one all right panel, we have to take a break. When we come back, the latest from the singapore summit as well as the effort to avoid a trade war with china and our closest allies. Closest allies. Larry kudlow joins us next. Man i got scar tissue there. Same thing with any dent or dings on this truck. They all got a story about what happened to em. Man 2 it was raining, there was only one way out. I could feel the barb wire was just digging into the paint. Man two bulls were fighting, thud bam hit the truck. Try explaining that to your insurance company. Woman another ding, another scratch. Itll just be another chapter in the story. Every scar tells a story, and you can tell a lot more stories when your truck is a chevy silverado. The most dependable, longestlasting, fullsize pickups on the road. They have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office . Stamps. Com mail letters ship packages all the Amazing Services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus 100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps. Com tv and never go to the post office again major news today on two fronts for the Trump Administration. First on trade. Commerce secretary wilbur ross is in beijing for talks aimed at fending off a trade war with china. U. S. Allies laughed with no tariffs on steel and aluminum about to retaliate. Second, preparations are wrapping up for thtrumpkim jongun summit in singapore. ais live at the white house with the latest on both. Reporter growing concerns on a trade war before the two largest economies can be inevitable after beijing warned washington no need to deal will take effect if President Trump follow through on his promise to hit china with no tariffs. Commerce secretary wilbur ross traveled to beijing with two goals in min trim the u. S. Massive hundred 75 billion trade deficit with china by 100 million and stave off a potentially explosive trade war. Mr. Trumps feelings on the issues filled out on twitter. If we charge a country zero and they charge us 2550 or even 100 percent to sell hours. Its unfair and can no longer be tolerated. Its not free or fair trade, it is stupid trade. An example the white house is fond of offering is that of the auto sector where china charges 25 percent on cars sold there and the eu 10 percent. The Trump Administration has hit canada, mexico and the eu with 25 percent tariffs on steel and 10 percent on aluminum. Saying its in the interest of National Security. A notion that left our neighbors to the north, godsmack. If canada can be security to National Security threat to the United States, is inconceivable reporter all against the backdrop of a week dominated by news with north korea. As officials handed over a letter to a the president from kim jongun. Warned the u. S. Will get no sanctions relief until there is a verifiable anddenuclearizatio. Chris kevin cork reporting from the white house. Joining me now for an exclusive interview, President Trumps Top White HouseEconomic Advisor, larry kudlow. Welcome back to Fox News Sunday. Thank you. Chris lets start with the singapore summit because President Trump has pneumatically softened what it is he is expecting and demanding from his first meeting with kim. Here is what National Security adviser john bolton said just after the summit was announcing here is President Trump this week. Take a look. Will President Trump insist that kim shipped out all of his nuclear weapons, all of his nuclear fuel, all of his Ballistic Missiles before the u. S. Makes any concessions . I think thats what denuclearization means. We will start a process and i told themto take your time. We can go fast or slowly be. Chris now the president is talking about a process of negoti not what john bolton was talking about which was unilateral, immediately disarmament. I think at the end of the process, thats the goal. Unilateral disarmament. It will be a process. I am not directly involved in them. John bolton is and the president. But sure, these negotiations take time. Its the same on trade. All of these negotiations take time. Everythings on the table during the negotiations. You cant expect they wont change rome in a day. I think thats a realistic attitude. The key point is that we are sitting down. The second key point is that the president has been bolder on this and korea and on world trade than any other recent president. Everybody says you cant do it. The president says hang on a second, we may be able to do it. Chris lets pick up specifically on that aspect because the president says the main reason he has gotten kim jongun to negotiate is because of this policy of maximum pressure. To really squeeze him. But this week, north korea is talking with the South Koreans, talking with the chinese. Hes talking with the russians is what President Trump now says about his policy of maximum pressure. I dont want to use the term maximum pressure. Because we are getting along. You see the relationship. Ch hasnt tim in effect ended his economic isolation without giving up a thing . I didnt know that. The one hes talking with china and there seems to be every indication they will relax economic sanctions. South korea is talking about an economic partnership. This is longer maximum pressure. I think over time, it may be relaxed but right now, i dont think so. I think the sanctions are in place, and they are very tough, very strong. I think there was a moment a week or 10 days back where the president was concerned about the chinese sanctions. They said we are still hanging tough. This is tough economic pressure. I think president whole attitude with respect to north korea. People yelled at him and said you were too strong. Everything is on the Table Including military action. That stuff works over a period of time. As we head into negotiations, i think the president is being very realistic and will take a period of time. I dont think we will let up on any of these matters. Chris the question is whether the chinese and South Koreans in effect have already started to let up. Let me turn to tariffs and the president s decision to go ahead and impose tennis on metal imports from some of our closest allies. Canada, mexico, the european union. You dismissed it as a family quarrel. Canadas Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau said its a quote, turning point in relations. He went on to say this. These tariffs are an affront to the longstanding Security Partnership between canada and the United States. And in particular, an affront to the thousands of canadians who havefought and died alongside their american brothers in arms. Chris sounds like a lot more than a family quarrel. I dont think our tariffs are anything to do with our friendship and our Longstanding Alliance with canada. Chris but we are imposing the terror because of National Security reasons. That is the implication that some trust canada as a reliable National Security partner when it comes to supplying steel and aluminum. I dont think we are satisfied yet that they will protect or uphold all of the shipments of steecoming into canada from around the world. Could be china, could be brazil and a lot of different places. This trend shipping effort has been troubling to us. The president has declared our Steel Industry a National Security matter and he hopes through these actions to rebuild it, there are signs that may be possible. In the announcement from the white house, it said very good faith you negotiations. E thats why i regard this more of a family quarrel. This is a trade dispute if you will. It can be solved if people work together. But, i must say this. This president from day one wants to reform the world trade system. It it working. There is so much unfair trading and illegal trade practices. Virtually no reciprocity. The World Trade Organization which sets these rules has been totally ineffectual. It has in some cases damaged the American Economy and American Workers and manufacturing and other businesses. So the president stepped up to the plate and as somebody was a free trader, ive got to say, if y have a level playing field, you can operate freetrade. Chris you make it like this is the beginning or midway point in negotiations. In fact, it represents somewhat of a breakdown. Let me put the timeline on the screen. President trump first threatened to impose these tariffs on march 1. This weeks action comes after more than a month of negotiation. The eu is now imposing tariffs on 3 billion of u. S. Goods. Canada on 13 billion of u. S. Imports. And for all the talk of protecting american jobs, the American Steelworkers Union opposes putting tariffson canada sing their exports are fairly traded. This isnt the beginning of a family squabble, the family has broken up and going into separate rooms. Sometimes that happens. Sometimes families have disputes. Goodfaith negotiations were part of our announcement the other day. Chris this is what comes at the end. The American Economy is booming and that has to be part of the discussion with respect to trade and confidence is booming. So that has to be part of the discussion of these matters can be solved. No one said they cant. Whether they will be, i dont know. The president s vision here and its very important, hes a trade reformer. At end of the day, he wou to see free trade but these barriers have to beswept away. Unfair trade practices, illegal, places like china. Chris we send more steel to canada than they sent to us. We they buy our steel and we buy their steel. Im not satisfied that all the loopholes has been closed. There are difficult issues, the president has raised the issue of intellectual property and darien farming and agriculture which is very important to our farm folks. It may be worked out. These tariffs may go on for a while or they may not. I dont want to make predictions today. Im just saying lets talkit through , but to say this is an attack on canada is not right. Chris i didnt say it was an attack on canada, thats what Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister said. I think hes overreacting. I dont want to get into the middle of that. A friend and ally of the United States, nobody denies that but we need to protect oures. Chris you were a tv analyst when the idea of tariffs on heres what you said. We are already hanging by a toenail. If we have to walk out of nafta or those negotiations break down, then this deal thing turns from a minor irritant to a major calamity for our economy and stock market. Chris mr. Kudlow, thats where we are now. The nafta talks have broken down. The tariffs are on. To quote larry kudlow, a major calamity for our economy and market products i hope it work. I hope it works out. Chris thats pretty cavalier. The nafta talks having broken down. As i said, take a look at the communiquc the white house put out. Goodfaith negotiations are welcome and we hope to continue. So i dont think things are broken down but i dont want to be cavalier about anything. These are very serious matters that can affect the economy. There are worries about that. So i dont wany that. But i do want to say this, if you cannot abide by the rules. Thats the thing. In the world trade game, rule breaking is all over the place. Thats why i think the president is right. Weve got to make reforms and stand up for u. S. Interests as we go along. Dont blame trump. Blame china. Blame europe. Blame nafta. Blame those that dont want reciprocal trading. Tariff rates and protectionism. Trump is responding to several decades of trade abuses. Chris want to get to something i know you want to talk about which is the very solid jobs report on friday. 3. 8 percent unemployment. The lowest rate since 1969. 3. 6 percent for women. The lowest since 1953. 5. 9 percent for black americans. How long can this last and sitting here right now, can you honestly say the possibility of trade disputes couldnt jeopardize that . It might be i dont deny that. You to keep an eye on that. Chris it can jeopardize that. Its possible. I think whats turned out to be the best prosperity boom in decades. The economy is clicking on all cylinders. As you noted jobs and unemployment. Money is being repatriated, trillions of dollars coming back home to the usa. We are right on the cusp of the three percent growth all of our critics said we couldnt have. Other private broadcasters are looking at four percent growth in the second quarter. I hope we get there. I would take another three percent growth. I think the tax thats in the rollback of regulations has created not only new incentives for tremendous confidence. Consumer surveys, business surveys, Small Business surveys. Trade conduct tale into this in a very positive way if the president is able to change these trading practices. Chris last question. There is a federal directive since the reagan years. The president you worked for and where we first met that the president does not comment on the jobs numbers until at least an hour after their formally announced. The president , 7 30, an hour before said looking forward to those numbers. And the markets reacted. You have said he did nothing wrong. Question, has he agreed he wont do it again . By law and custom, i was doing my job and it was number and i got a hold of him on air force one. Has he done anything wrong, other president s have done this before. Chris no, he did it before he got the numbers. President s can say what they will say. If you put the number out, that would been a much more difficult proposition. Will he do it again, i dont know if he will do it again but i hope he doesnt but you know, just saying lets look at the job numbers. All of america is looking at the job numbers. Thats a harmless tweet. Stock futures did nothing. Two basis points, come on. [laughter] chris thank you. Always a pleasure to talk with you. Up next, we bring in our sunday group to talk prospects of the summit and the threat of a i have never said it happens in one meeting. Youre talking years of hostility. Years of problems. Years of early hatred between so many different nations. But i think youll have a very positive result in the end. Chris President Trump expressing optimism but lowering expectations for his singapore summit with north koreas kim jongun. Were back now with the panel. What are your thoughts, it is nine days away. Is the president giving up too much without any guarantee of what he will get . Its long been thought for the president of the United States to sit down with some rope dictator would confer legitimacy on that person and is therefore not a good idea to do unless exchange for something worthy. Theres a few in this administration, we dont know if its right yet. Something really is different with the north koreans at this time. We will find out. I think the president seeming eagerness for this to go forward is a little troubling because it may look like he wants the deal too badly which weakens your position. At the same time, he does appear to be prepared for the fact that it wont be some staggering breakthrough in his first round of discussions and it could lead to a long process. Which is a realistic way to look at it. And thats what you hope for in a negotiation like this is that the president has realistic expectations which mr. Trump at times seems not to. Chris i go back to what bolton and pompeo were staying in the beginning when they were talking about the first meetin , when will you get rid of everything and if they didnt give you a date, you get up and walk out. Now theyre talking about a process, a series of meetings. Negotiations. Givenorth koreas history where they make promises and renege on them, does the summit still make sense . No, if you put in those terms but brit makes a wise point. You hope this leads to something and that it is rewarded in the end. The problem is we know historically going back to kim jonguns grandfather, bill clinton and in 1994. These people live. They are deceitful. They will take the concessions. Keep them in their pocket and then they will deliver. So it looks like the president is saying, maybe we can and the korean war that will be the big announcement at the summit. Maybe we can say that we are lessening sanctions in the hope abut that seems like a lengthy process and it does not seem to justify rewarding a brutal dictator with a position on the International Stage lets turn to the other big news and that is the president announcing new sanctions going into effect on june 1 against some of our closest allies. The eu and canada and mexico. Heres what the president said on friday. The American Worker agrees with me. Obviously, ttock market agrees because when you look at the stocks, you are starting to see them chris going after china is one thing, going after our closest allies is a different matter. Its a terrible idea. He talks about the American Worker and hes talking about 140,000 steelworkers in america. The wall street journal points out there are 6. 5 million American Workers in Steel Using Industries that will be harmed by this. Chris the auto business. Across a ton of different industries. I think it is telling and unfortunate from the administrations perspective that you have this lengthy backandforth with larry kudlow moments ago and the amazing job report and stay of the us economy almost felt like an afterthought because we are ould mard with her or not terrorist against some of our closest friends which was for a wet blanket over the movement that i think is attributable to trumped policies on deregulation and taxes. This is a totally needless fight. Chris let me pick up on that with you because, International Trade is not checkers. Its threedimensional chess. Youve got china as we impose tariffs on allies, china is reaching out thing you can do business with us and we will remove barriers to our markets. We have now put more tariffs on our allies in china. The presidencys Foreign Affairs as winners and losers and he doesnt often talk about things that are mutually beneficial. Whether its trade or diplomacy, hes really good at tearing things down. He ripped up ptd, nafta, so far hes been good at ripping things up and not good at building things back up or putting new agreements in place. Thats what will be interesting but as you get tariffs and trade and nafta which the canadians are very upset about or north korean diplomacy, whether he can actually make deals or just tear them up. That is an open question today. Chris i want to pick up on the last thing i discussed with larry kudlow and that is these astonishing job numbers. Lowest uneloyment since the 60s and in one case the 50s and in another case, could that be derailed if you get into a serious trade dispute let alone war . Certainly could and theres no doubt in my mind that the president and putting these terrorists in place is playing with fire tariffs in place. However, i would caution that i think the president sees this as a continued negotiation. But weve been negotiation with some of these countries for some time now in hopes of a better deal and it hasnt materialized. Theres a long way to go. Its kind of the corollary to diplomacy. Here we are practicing trade negotiations with the threat of tariffs but tariffs are almost always ruinous to both sides. Chris thank you all. Up next, some surprising advice for that class of 2018 from our power players of the week. On my tempurpedic, the sleep i get is better than any other mattress ive ever tried. Experience the most highly recommended bed in america for yourself. Now through june 3rd is your last chance to save up to 700 on select Adjustable Mattress sets. Visit tempurpedic. Com to find your exclusive retailer. Its become an annual tradition to sample some of the words of Wisdom College graduates are getting at their commencement. This year, the speakers include world leaders, a tech giant and some superheroes. They are all r ayers of the week. We know that glory will be yours because you are winners. You are warriors, your fighters, you are champions. And you will lead us only to victory. You cant stand in line at starbucks, go to a party or anyplace without everywhere you turn, people are talking about how bad things are. How terrible it is. This is what i know. The problem is, everybody is meeting hysteria with more hysteria. And then we just are all becoming hysterical and its getting worse. Dont just accept the world you inherit today. Dont just accept the status quo. No big challenge has ever been solved and no lasting improvement has ever been achieved unless people there to try something different. I dont know what your future is. But if you are willing to take the harder way, the more complicated one viewed the one with morefailures at first then successes. The one that has ultimately proven to have more meaning, more victory, more glory , that you will not regret it. We cannot reviewer anyone so much that we become afraid to reach their height of protest some. You do it a disservice trying to live up to your ancestors. You have to outlive them. We all know of gratitude as a feeling. The good feeling we have for the things we have been given. But what i want to talk about is gratitude as intention. That is, gratitude as the determination to take the things that have benefited us and pay them forward. Let yourself be vulnerable. To another point of view. That takes true coverage. To open yourself to another conviction and risk being convinced a little or a lot of the validity of their perspective. Ive got two words that i want yall to remember that are very important and if i leave you with anything. I will leave you with these two words. Those two words are, im batman. [laughter] our best wishes as well to the students and parents of the class of 2018. Now this program note, tune in next week as Fox News Sunday heads to singapore. We will kick off fox News Coverage from there ahead of the historic summit between President Trump and kim jongun. The latest developments from singapore just before the leaders of the u. S. And north korea meet for the first time. Thats it for today. Have a great week. And we will see you next Fox News Sunday. Howie the culture war over rose and samantha bee. Roseanne blaming ambien. We know what donald trump thinks. We know what Roseanne Barr thinks. Its time for to us stop playing around with soft words by saying, oh, they are saying i sensitive things. No, its racist. President trump cannot be blamed for everything wrong with our country. Donald trump is also a racist. Donald trumps