>> sandra: we know where this is going next, followed it minute-by-minute, today. the jurors sworn in, the prosecution as of monday, it was confirmed today they will be able to start making their case, emily. >> emily: and the question is sort of, will the defense be able to make their case? when you post that hypothetical that you would have your lawyers make the case for you and if rules are set in place and you don't obey, naturally incarceration is the next step, but the question is one of the rules are unfair? what if they are totally rigged against you? what if the applications of those rules are totally faulty and by that i mean as trump's defense have tried to, for example, some of subpoena stormy daniels this week so they can get public information that is in that, interestingly-released documentary just in time for her till they make a lot of money. that was called witness intimidation and harassment. the question remains, how can trump's defense team adequately and accurately defend themselves when they are being blocked, i argue, from even assessing the information? how is it that the defendant's gag ordered but the star witness