personally withheld usaid until the prosecutor he wanted fired was actually fired. biden received a personal benefit for his official act, namely the ability of his son to continue to collect money from a corrupt ukrainian company. hunter and joe biden had a direct financial stake in avoiding an investigation that might lead to the company's demise. and his gravy train would stop. of course, this is obvious and everybody can see it. there was an article in "the new york times" published in may that stated the following about the ukrainian prosecutor's ouster, among those who had a stake in the outcome was hunter biden. his younger son who at the time was on the board of an energy company owned by a ukrainian oligarch who had been in the side of the fired prosecutor general. and of course, joe biden had a personal interest in avoiding a political scandal involving his son. clearly a requested informational investigation into biden's dealings was justified as an informational investigation into an abuse of
Related Keywords
Joe Biden , Corrupt Ukrainian Company , Prosecutor , Son , Mo Ney , Ability , Benefit , Fact , Usaid , Course , Investigation , Article , Everybody , Stake , Son Hunter And , The New York Times , Gravy Train , Demise , Following , May , Energy , Ukrainian , Board , Burisma Or Information On Hunter Biden , Ukrainian Oligarch , Ouster , Outcome , Abuse , Side , Interest , Prosecutor General , Dealings , Scandal ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.