it was pretty clear what she was trying to do, but then she took it down and try to change her story. >> if we saw the tweet, we misinterpreted what the meaning was in the situation? not a good look for "the washington post." also a cnn contributor, by the way., it it goes back to perception. so i go back to the 2016 campaign. a "usa today" poll asked a thousand likely voters, who do you think the media is rooting for, hillary clinton or donald trump? by a 10-1 margin, the public said hillary clinton, including clinton supporters who saw it that way. that's the perception, right? look at 2016 again, the hill does a tally. how many major newspapers were endorsing hillary clinton and how many donald trump? 57 for hillary clinton. 2 for donald trump. what did that get him, as set of you saw the eclipse that you saw before. this is devastating for the president. if that's the case, why are his poll numbers now on a 12-point