she said that on the stand she would not have stopped him. how does that play in? >> it's a terrible tragedy. the reason she said they made the stop she's training the new office or the officer wanted to do it. they had the probable cause to stop she typically would not have because all the other issues they have to deal with. she thought to be a grid training opportunity. i don't think this is going to affect the jurors that much. the defenses that a great job showing officer potter had never had and 26 years a single complaint against her. she is a volunteer and got kids and some people say what is that have to do with anything? what has just as a former homicide prosecutor i would be concerned about the idea the jury may nullify it's a real thing that goes on that's where they say it yes she violated the law with him but given the circumstances we just do not feel comfortable convicting here. i think is a former homicide prosecutor i would be very concerned if i were handling this case i would not be getting a conviction in it.