Around mrs mays heels with the conservative partys ratings currently plummeting through the floor the party even survived. And. Your party has scored its worst election result in its history in the european elections dire warnings that the partys going to collapse cant unite. Collapse does not know its time it picked a new leader and thats what were going to do. I resigned as leader of the conservative party on friday and we then have a process to pick a new leader in essence the members of parliament there are 313 conservative and hes at present we. To narrow it down to 2 candidates and then the Party Members will vote by the end of july and they will take in a post about one of those 2 candidates who will then become the Prime Minister at some point the Prime Minister will probably have to win a vote of confidence in the house of commons probably realistically in the autumn which if its a hardline groups who do you lose what i doubt is theres no appetite for a new deal with. Well personally i think i think think we have to have an idea i think we can go one better so why not sign the deal than already on the deal is dead and its been turned down 3 times boy the house of commons the 1st defeat was the biggest defeat any British Government has ever suffered in the entire history of parliament about hundreds of years the deal is never going to go through and the reason the deal was defeated is because ive read it its a 585585 yes twice and thats my job im a member of pong and it isnt in effect a Draft International treaty so what do you think you can get the problem with the socalled Withdrawal Agreement in a nutshell is that we didnt withdrawal we still remain because of the backstop in a Customs Union we wouldnt run and run trade policy we can do that on International Try to do with america will join a real brazil the European Court of justice would still have power just in the transition period well just in the transition. Because the arbitration process period last beyond that if you look at all to once and for all and. There will be a number of other areas like the joint committee which last beyond the transition period which by which team Civil Servants effectively could michael or above the head of Parliament Say you know mr falls for the deal provides for an exit from europes Political Union and its institutions true or false isnt that what you want to know that is not true because its still to say for instance the joint Committee Still means political control so the deal the states are the deal is date and theres not a business no other deal on offer so what do you do what you do is you accept that the deal is did. And you say can we do better than you do in fact we can so what you do is you go straight to the socalled future relationship. And you say which is the desired end state at the end of all of these negotiations and that is a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union so that we can try to a mutual benefits an advantage with low no tariffs into the facility will future we were always going to have to at some point agree the future relationship so my argument would be little difference that would flood britains low or agricultural markets and manufacturing lamarck well thats a massive finnick. But there is an existing template its the e. U. Canadian Free Trade Agreement which was signed in 2016 which took how many years to look at well that took 7 years to negotiate it but the advantage of that is that weve already done all the heavy lifting so we all get by all the heavy lifting its a very different issue. What you would do very different but what you do we see tight as a start point so you have a template that you know by definition the e. U. Did accept because they signed it and then you say you dont start with a blank piece of paper you start with the hats and then you see whether you can modify it so for instance it would be to start from a weaker position because by then you doing the oh yes im perfectly prepared to leave on w t o terms while those negotiations take place but i would aspire to the fact the industry is warning that this is going to be a nonsense if you could say well youre project fantasy you dont know who did well the european elect you know the european elections in this country. Overwhelmingly won by the brics party policy was to beat if necessary with no deal the people in this country overwhelmingly voted for that so there is a mandate but what im saying is youre not saying theres a majority of people in this country who want to do no deal because because theres nothing to suggest that while i dont as a matter of fact the european elections were clearly won by the party that will be the turn of the 37 percent mr francois thats not a majority of the british people is that forgive me the majority to leave in the turn 16 referendum 17400000 british people basically thats the biggest votes weve ever had in this country on any proposition ever in our entire history as a nation can come just talk about the leaders because i know youre going to see Boris Johnson after this is somebody you can support as Prime Minister but i havent had the sort of whether or not to vote for gore thats probably what im going to. But you would consider it well i will vote for breakfast here there is no way i will vote for remain the reason i was and remain at heart was never in leaving she always saw it as a kind of damage limitation exercise so you say that she said she was quite concerned to deliver back that she promised on the numerable occasions to deliver bread but she failed and in the end im afraid well have to fail well she of the party lost confidence in that and so did the house of commons you happy that Boris Johnson being ordered to appear in court over claims that he lied during the reverend well over this 350000000 pounds a week to the well the person hes done is an absolute. And actually if its not matter well yes of course it why it doesnt have a bearing on the merits. While it does because clearly hes doing it from a particular perspective if the game is to damage boris it will have precisely the opposite effect because remember the decision on who to pick will go to our members and if they see him being hounded in the courts upon on minor theyre more likely to vote for him so at so you you undermine him public faith in the courts you know i think the courts will reach the right decision i mean the judge was quite clear i am satisfied there is sufficient to establish prime a facia evidence of an issue to be determined at trial well i would argue that the place to argue politics is in parliament not in the courtroom its arguing whether the charges are lessons that we deliberately misled voters hes allegations of misconduct in Public Office important well i dont believe he did but he will make a point to decide that but i think it is as i say its a politically motivated challenged by an alternate remain and what it will do is it will probably big votes among tory Party Members that the courts are an independent will reach an independent decision and in any case the figure was absurd it was served by this issue the fiscal studies are misleading by the case the district so well actually were not using it well the conservative government has now announced the 20000000000 pounds and. Cash injection into the National Health service on the whats known as the n. H. S. 10 year plan. That will actually more than cover 350000000 pound think it will actually end up spending money even larger for our show use that figure during the Referendum Campaign admitting that it simply wasnt sure well if it let us see what the arguments only knew it wasnt true. That 350000000 was why didnt you call it out what excuse me lets see what the Court Decides when i debated but at the end of the day youre not answering my question well knew it was faulty you didnt know it was the growth it was the correct figure it was an arc it wasnt sold as a gross for well it was an argument about where they used to gregs figure or net think it was a gross thing it was literally true. And im sure you might not pointing to parse is has a history of being economical with the truth doesnt it tell britains after the referendum that they would still have access to the Single Market turned out to be nonsense that you are not here is an advocate for you when you said you might vote for him well i said i might but i suggest you go off to interview Boris Johnson this hes not here perhaps youd like to interview me i am a view about what you thought what you thought about boris was on sunday im going to go after this im afraid your cameras might be present. The country wanted this bill that youve said is dead in the water this with drama did build it well what do you base that the opinion polls which opinion polls ok marsha 20 nights you gov poll those who voted leave in 2016 the outcome which you supported these same people wanted to see that deal passed by 49 percent to 30 percent conservative voters are still the same day wanted by an even higher margin margin to get this deal over the line 57 percent to 24 percent if you didnt care what they thought is it any wonder they are care what you think you know the world will vote for your party let me give you another you know which was prior to that which said that 54 percent of the public did not believe that the Withdrawal Agreement represented leaving you 14 percent one for it but they still wanted to pass that on the 29th of march poll same people that voted leave it passed both 49 to 30 percent have you read the drug agreement. Why do you need me to feel well ive read it so i know whats in it do you i dont need to in other words with your other words i dont need to in other words you dont like it so it doesnt matter whether i know or not does it well i do because i read it and thats why they voted against it im talking about the polls and the British Public people who voted leave the supporters will you with respect youre trying to lecture me on the great not the wide range and you havent im not actually perhaps youd like to do this in this interview again when you read the majority people were on because you would be much better informed people were asked a very simple question 2016 referenda work that should do you came remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union that was the question that was on the back up they didnt vote for a proper bricks it or. No deal bricks it in fact all up to vote leave was pretty clear there wouldnt be a no deal that comes in as well as i was trying to argue i think that the best outcome is not an idea that come its a Free Trade Agreement but why is it that you particularly in this part of the conservative party of set yourself up as the arbiters of what really moves because the Withdrawal Agreement doesnt achieve it and therefore we want something that does we want to leave the European Union we want to be a sovereign nation we want to elect our own government and make our own moves and at the end of the the someone who campaigned the lot in the referendum. That was the critical issue there were a number of issues apply the money was an issue immigration was an issue but the overriding issue was sovereignty it was about who governs who might sound laws you governs our wildlife and the british people voted by a majority of well over a 1000000 votes that we wanted to take back control of our own destiny in our own government thats really what breaks it means on the 31st of october that is precisely what were going to take lets talk a bit about the nature of the political discourse in britain at the moment what happened to compromise in british politics and i ask this because this issue has helped to turn britain into a pretty angry and divided country hasnt it new york colleagues often seem to revel in the war or i wouldnt use the word rival but the truth is is that the british establishment in one meaning i include nuts and powerful officials in number 10 downing street and in the calaboose office sighing kluge a number of the many members of parliament or include some in the media or not yourselves. Who would never accept the result of the referendum he thought people were wrong and who spent 3 years doing their best to frustrate their decision so its a conspiracy its them and us its the people versus the establishment as you wrote as you wrote you know thats exactly what it is and all in the european elections the people won and your expression of fellow travelers which you also put in your article suggests a whiff of cold war treachery one of the apocalyptic language that you and your colleagues are using bill cash one of your senior members accused the reason may of appeasement a forced and humiliating surrender former Foreign Office minister alice to criticize the use of words like mendacity surrender the trail does it ever cross your mind he said to bill cash what youre contributing to the answer is a toxic. Environment well the some newspaper and the telegraph newspaper analyzed the withdraw agreement when it was published in their words not knowing the squad to surrender so you might want to take it up with the editor of the sun or the editor of the Daily Telegraph yeah but you dont need to parrot what the sun says or the Daily Telegraph neither my point is that they were using that language in their National Newspapers yeah so do you do you set your compass by what the National Newspapers do on the country you said there are people in the press you dont want to follow who are part of this conspiracy well ive read of it on agreement and it is a story thats why i would never vote for it. Is the country divided enough without people poor in more oil on the far. Painting them and us scenarios like you do talking of conspiracies when the other side the people who oppose your view just think differently thats it they think different there are love to think differently in a democracy of course they are but equally its important to remember that before the referendum the government spent 9000000 pounds of british taxpayers money sending a leaflet through every tool in the United Kingdom to try and persuade us to remain. Now in that leaflet in the last page it says very clearly this is a once in a generation decision. And it then said i want to remember the words literally it says this is your decision the government will implement what you decide or the people decide it decided but the government didnt implement it hence the division in the frustration in our country if the government to done what the people having given them the choice having promised that they would implement their decision when the people decided many people in government didnt like thought it was the wrong answer if they had implemented the decisions they promised in the book as they promised every electorate in the United Kingdom we wouldnt be in this who was it who said if a democracy color changes mind its not a democracy remember who said the church oh it was david davis more recently i saw him in 2012 he said in a speech writer who once said something along those lines but anyway but anyway this would have been more recent 2012 and thats really thats a promise that people can change their minds why cant they change their minds over practices will you change your mind i dont remember what leader youve got well i am and i dont want government with respect so i havent changed my mind over breakfast you the conservatives well look. The people voted. They took a decision they didnt change their mind well weve taken a decision in parliament we spent 40 years in the house of commons arguing about your own words really from the day that we joined the European Economic community in 1973 in the end we agreed on one thing which is that we couldnt agree so we all agree or nearly everybody overwhelmingly in the house of commons voted to put the decision to the british people in a referendum and i think from memory over 500 m. P. s voted for that will there abouts so the house of commons overwhelmingly said lets put it to the people and everybody promised faithfully to abide by the result now you could all he was sitting with a thought that because both sides thought they were going to win but anyway everybody promised and the decision was to leave and yet many people in the house of commons never accepted it felt it was the wrong answer felt the people had made a dreadful mistake and they spent the last 3 years digging that he was doing everything they can to frustrate the will of the people this as i said you quoted me this is more from leave this is remain to the people versus the establishment in the end in a democracy the people must provide mr francois you took issue when i said you were revelling in the divisions in the country but you like to pick out targets to have a go at the cheap when the german boss of their bus time and said bracks tears were mad to say his company would never leave the u. K. Because a huge factor is that you let them have it with both barrels didnt ship tuesday with teutonic arrogance and they started talking about your father did a veteran who never submitted to bullying by any german nor would he son you said. One of those mistakes and has got to do with the war and your father on d. Day well mr rennes has now been replaced by game formally who said at a press conference i think 2 weeks ago that air bus whatever happened the bricks that were now remain in the United Kingdom and were committed to the arctic so he has a different view yes but at the time you said it what did mr enders have to do with well known father indeed well mr end this by he spotted threatening to withdraw 40000 jobs from the United Kingdom was effectively trying to bully british members of parliament and how to vote in the house of commons was appalling he was pointing out that if you took certain political decisions in this country there will be consequences for his company well those consequences appear to have chains because the new chief executive of a boss who is she was saying off as aggressive as mr and this in his character is now short of here for the long term aggressive about him taking seriously his responsibility for the thousands of workers. Employees in the u. K. Well he was threatening to take away their jobs thats how seriously he took his responsibility he was warning them that the jobs were in danger he wasnt threatening to take well he was warning that jobs were in danger well it would appear the new c. E. O. Says theyre not you think people will say. Mr is the 1st one was tough here he stuck it to the germans is what did you want to come out of this extraordinary exchange with you but i dont think any any company be they british or european or american or brazilian would join these be the hallway or anybody else should attempt to bully the house of coons. Now donald trump attempts to bully there is not a company easy you said any any political leader you know who i said any company are but you meet because alone where donald trump is going sleaze if you come see i think this is what every look i dont mean i dont mean to. Challenge your skill as an interview but if you are going to quote me properly about what i didnt like that about double trouble because hes not a company ok so why are you so silent when he comes in he he insults the mayor of london the duchess of sussex he tells the government what to do he indorse is johnson the leader and youre quite happy about that to be bullied by america was silent about that one second i thought we were talking about brits we are. Talking about divisions as well were talking about your attitude to people telling britain and trying to bully thats what we do well so i think were talking about a company that attempted to bully the house of commons you know and now were talking about the leaders attempting to bully hospitals walk ok donald trump is not a company hes an elected i understand now he is the president of the United States now some people dont like him but he was democratically elected by the American People he holds that office because he won the president ial election in the United States now hes not everybodys cup of tea hes extremely plaing speaking some people dont like that on the plain speaking politician someone are not frightened of that but that he has engaged in a direct flagrant attempt to influence british politics well for instance you wouldnt accept this from many european leaders we wont for instance he has been involved in a debate about whether or not we should allow the Chinese Company hockey access to our Telecommunications Network when we grow a 5 g. Network in this country personally i think hes right that the National Security council as we now know. Were divided on the issue some secretaries of state thought that it was acceptable and we could manage the risk other sectors of state thought that we couldnt manage the risk and it was far too dangerous person threatening the burden of it doesnt make the right decision over reduce intelligence cooperation thats bullying isnt well were going to be about one second i think what he said and again maybe you might want to interview him about it but i think hes cautioning us against what he believes is not a wise course of action because the intelligence sharing between the socalled 5 on its community ourselves the United States striking a can as a new zealand is fundamental to the National Security of all 5 of this and indeed to the west the more point as you accept kind of. Set from the european leaders well the present in the other states has a view and hes come over here and he tends to ignore the view details what he wants the long haul what i think is right so as long as hes right youre happy to accept i dont think him commenting on paul why he is pulling. Lets talk about jericho because youve got 3 minutes to talk about whatever you want to talk about jimmy call in april you called him a marxist with anti semitic tendencies he is a marxist so what he happens to be an elected leader of her majestys loyal opposition here why does that rule him out as an interlocutor for your party because you can claim that the reason may shouldnt have sat down and spoken Jeremy Corbyn is not just a marxist he has presided over a culture of anti semitism within the labor party which is now being investigated by the Human Rights Commission not by the real party has been accused of islamophobia what one second he is a republican has been with his life doesnt quite it doesnt want the moment he. Is a lifelong member of the campaign for the plea at the so moment he has always passionately believed in reducing and digging for polishing and nuclear defenses hes been aligned in a free and Fair Elections we accelerate democracy i accept that he is the leader of the labor party but he is antithetical to everything my party believes why should we get into bed with a man who represents everything we detest so what you said in effect is that jeremy coburns political beliefs whatever they may be have put him beyond the pale and ruled him out as a political interlocutor thats a dangerous idea in a democracy isnt only talk to the people whose views you like. With respect we talked to the other politicians all the time in the house of commons that youre doing along with i wouldnt so i wouldnt do a deal over the future of this country with that man never mind the fact that he is freely and fairly elected theyve chosen him to be their leader doesnt mean i have to agree with them i think hed be a disastrous Prime Minister and i hope and believe he would never be the Prime Minister of the you know what would your efforts the office of conservative party well put him in the top slot i did well this year how will you think then of what youve done well id. I believe Jeremy Coleman will win the general election because i dont believe the british people want to vote for a marxist one anti semitic youre not necessarily the best clairvoyant well if its an election the really important thing about that is you cant decide and neither will all the people will its called democracy thank you for your time thank you very much indeed. Go to college. Keep learning marked realises wait a 2nd we want the whole picture perfect so set up make idea shift deliver us. From augmented reality to cryptocurrency your top picks for live in an ever changing Digital World lets start with digitalisation clear shift. In good shape in modern society the pressure to perform seems on the present but sometimes. Cannot be embedded. In for tests is a test of his comment and its wrong to the economics you should talk about greasing only common incidence of erectile dysfunction our focus in this week. 30 minutes. I think in everything channing 1st under a muslim. So much different culture between here and there challenging for empathy playing. To some of the southerner was worth it for me to come to germany. Got my license to work as a swimming instructor a vision our 2 children 100 of us was one of the toughest as. Whats your story take part cherish on info my greenstock miss. Chancellor. Listen carefully to. See if she needs to do to. Discover the a. The i. Subscribe to. Documentary on you tube. Play. Play. Play play play. This is deja news live from berlin mexico avoids potentially devastating us fair with a last minute deal on migration President Trump says planned levies on mexican goods are suspended indefinitely after mexico agrees to do more to stem the flow of migrants crossing its territory also coming up. German foreign minister heiko mox begins a tour of the middle east with stops in jordan and iraq to reduce tensions with iran
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.