is at it again. he has become a walking misinformation machine. he is now suggesting, without evidence, that the fbi had advance knowledge of the january 6th riot but did nothing about it. what is he trying to suggest and what was the context for where he made these comments? >> so this is according to "the washington post." this was a piece of video that they showed in a story in which he is caught on camera suggesting that because the fbi deeply infiltrated a plot to kidnap michigan governor gretchen whitmer and eventually brought those men to justice in october of last year, because they knew so much about that case that surely they would have known so much about the people who attacked the capitol. he was suggesting it is unlikely the fbi wouldn't have known a lot about the people who were planning an attack as immense as what happened at the capitol. there is no evidence to suggest this. this is a conspiracy theory. it is built on this idea from, you know, the right who are
Related Keywords
Comments , Evidence , Nothing , Fbi , Context , Knowledge , Walking Misinformation Machine , January 6th Riot , January 6th , 6 , Governor , Story , Camera , Piece , Plot , Video , Washington Post , Michigan , People , Capitol , Case , Men , Justice , Gretchen Whitmer , Wouldn T , Lot , Idea , Right , Conspiracy Theory , Attack ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.