witnesses that clearly nowjer perjured themselves and that wouldn't be able to testify at trial and a release of grand jury transcripts. in that case why not have a grand juror have the ability to speak out in the name of what the prosecutors have called transparency? >> great argument. >> there's another point here which is that mccullough, the prosecutor characterized the views of the grand jury. he said everybody agreed there was no basis for charges. that is exactly what this grand juror wants to refute. so the idea is that mccullough opened the door legally. and other people should who were in that room should be able to comment as well. >> here's a portion of that lawsuit that i will read to you that explains why, exactly what you just said why the juror wants to do this the current information available about the grand jury's views is not entirely accurate. especially the implication that all grand jurors believed there was no support for any charges. so that sounds like a pretty
Related Keywords
Case , Grand Juror , Wouldn T , Release , Ferguson Grand Jury , Transcripts , Trial , In The Name Of , Witnesses , Ability , Point , Everybody , Prosecutor , Argument , Mccullough , Basis , Grand Jury , Views , Prosecutors , Transparency , People , Idea , Lawsuit , Door , Portion , Charges , Room , Support , Information , Juror , Implication , Grand Jurors ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.