unenumerated fundamental right, and the voters -- whatever they've said is irrelevant because we, five members of the supreme court, are going to decide what the law of the land should be. and anybody who disagrees with us will be labeled a bigot or be accused of discrimination, even if those -- their beliefs happen to flow from sincerely held religious conviction like the definition of a marriage between a man and a woman. but you've already told me that you see why this is a concern. >> i see why it is a concern, and i would just say that, although the supreme court is not, you know, bound in the sense of having to apply prior precedent, there is stare decisis in our system. there are now standards in the stare decisis world that the supreme court applies when it -- when it's asked to --
Related Keywords
Supreme Court , Unenumerated Fundamental Right , Voters , Members , Anybody , Law Of The Land , Five , Marriage , Beliefs , Us , Definition , A Man Anda Woman , Conviction , Bigot , Discrimination , Concern , Sense , Precedent , System , Stare Decisis , Stare Decisis World ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.