language, that is purported to exempt from liability anyone with the potential defendant against ms giuffre, but that should protect them from liability in this case. what we see her attorneys arguing is that this provision is so broad that this provision is so broad that it that this provision is so broad thatitis that this provision is so broad that it is invalid, and furthermore, that because of the fact that prince andrew could not have been sued in florida at the time in which the 2009 lawsuit was being brought, that this provision could not apply to him. in your experience. — could not apply to him. in your experience, can _ could not apply to him. in your experience, can the _ could not apply to him. in your experience, can the judge - could not apply to him. in your. experience, can thejudge make a determination based on the language that we've seen? it’s language that we've seen? it's very difficult. _ language that we've seen? it�*s very difficult, looking at the four corners of this document. to see howjudge kaplan would be able to make that decision, that this should dismiss prince

Related Keywords

Case Cannot Go Forward , Virginia Roberts Giuffre , Ms , Liability , Anyone , Language , Defendant , Attorneys , Prince Andrew , Provision , Fact , Lawsuit , Thatitis , Florida , 2009 , Experience , Judge , Determination , Thejudge , Document , It , Decision , Howjudge Kaplan , Corners , Four ,