change and also to protect human rights, so this adds to the reasons why australia will need to shift away from fossil fuel exports. need to shift away from fossil fuel “porte— fuel exports. but these judgements _ fuel exports. but these judgements though - fuel exports. but these i judgements though would not fuel exports. but these - judgements though would not be legally binding so how will the rule of international law actually be upheld? well, it's not legally — actually be upheld? well, it's not legally binding _ actually be upheld? well, it's not legally binding itself, i not legally binding itself, what it does is it clarifies the current state of international law with regards to the obligations that countries have, both to tackle climate change and to protect and tackle climate change to protect people's human rights. and to realise their human rights. the right to health, the right to education, the right to housing, so it will be drawn upon in legal decisions and a whole range of jurisdictions at the domestic level and the international

Related Keywords

Human Rights , Australia , Reasons , Fossil Fuel Exports , Porte Fuel Exports , Fossil Fuel , Law , Exports , Binding , Judgements , Itself , Regards , Estate , Fuel Exports , Rule , People , Countries , Obligations , Climate Change , Health , Orange , Decisions , Level , Jurisdictions , Housing , Education ,