properly tested. they were saying he should not be extradited to the united states. but, as we havejust heard in the last few seconds, united states has one that appeal in the high court in london over the extradition of the wikileaks founder julian sands. so what happens next, we will have to wait and see. but edward fitzgerald who was representing julian as unch had said that the earlierjudgment, which was against extradition to the united states, had been carefully considered and a fully reasoned judgment. he said it was clear that thejudge injanuary had scrupulously applied the test. he told the court it was perfectly reasonable to find it oppressive to extradite a mentally disordered person, because his extradition is likely to result in his death. the whole case really centred on whether there was a suicide risk ifjulian