Submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the december 10t december 10th board of supervisors board of agenda. Item agenda number one is an ordinance amending the health code to maintain and operate at full capacity an adult residential facility with no fewer than 41 beds and amending the administrative code to establish the working group to advise the board of supervisors and the mayor regarding resident care, training, workplace conditions and staffing at the arf at 887 patrro. Thank you. This item is before us following substantive amendments at last weeks meeting and i want to note that the legislative aid for supervisor ronan is here should we have any questions on this item. Before we go to Public Comment, supervisor brown, do you have any comments . No. Any members who would like to testify on this item . Seeing none, point comment is closed. And can we send this item to the full bider positive recommendation without objection . Yes. And so mr. Clerk, please calls items 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 . A resolution approving a mills act for a contract between assessmently a. S. A. D. O. W. S. K. I. , the owner of 2251 webster and a resolution improving a contract of 1401 howard llc and agenda item 4 is a resolution approving an act to property contract of gustov lign divisiogist and a py contract with the Swedish Society of 2861 Market Street and number 6 is a resolution approving a mills act contract between adell fung, Brent Goldman and 2735 fullson street, llc and the city and county of San Francisco. All agreements made pursuant to code 71 and authorized planning director to execute and record the historical property contracts. Well hear something from the Planning Commission on these items but we have a number of folks available to answer any questions that arise, including principal planner, elizabeth gordon, preservation planner, stephanie cicneros, the chief of real property, michael gine and applicants from the properties on howard, patomic and fullson streets in items 3, 4, 5 and 6. The Property Owner of webster street reflected in item two is out of town and was unable to attend today and now i would like to welcome michelle tailor, preservation planner with the Planning Department to present on these items. Miss taylor. Thank you. I will present a general overview and frida present on eh contract. There is local governments to enter to contracts with private owners with qualified Historic Properties and this to agreement provides property of tax reductions to owners of those historic prompts who can then allocate the savings toward a maintenance and restoration plan. It is the only local program that creates a financial incentive for proper maintenance of the citys architectural landmarks and from delaying largescale projects when put off can cause damage to the buildings. Put every local landmark building, as well as those listed on the state or National Register of Historical Places is eligible to apply for the mills act program. The department currently holds 37 active mills act contracts with the largest number in the debose historic district. Buildings under contract include singlefamily homes, multifamily buildings and large scale commercial buildings. Staff has reviewed each of the five applications and Department Staff conducting preapproval inspections working with applicants to revise rehabilitation and restoration Maintenance Plans as necessary. Staff also are reviewed all asks on the merits of five priority considerations. The five priority considerations are a necessity, distinctiveness, recently designated city landmarks, investment and legacy business and im happy to answer any questions about these priority considerations or any other review process. Ththis was built in the italianbuilt style in circa 1800 and applicant completed some rehabilitation scopes for the building including dryrot repair and painting with an estimated cost of 12,650. The proposed Rehabilitation Plan includes inkind window replacement, interior plaster and repair caus caused by exterr leak and roof repair and replacement and painting. Rehabilitation work is estimated to cost 113,000 over ten years. And the proposed Maintenance Plan included annual inspection of the wood siding, windows and roof and Maintenance Work is estimated to cost 2,880 annually the Property Owner will receive an estimated property tax savings of 14,184 and this is a 66. 37 reduction from factorbased year value. This was currently valued over 5 million and was demonstrated that the granting would assist in what otherwise might be in damage of alterations. There is final approval for the federal Historic Preservation tax incentive in 2018. The proposed Maintenance Plan includes inspection of interior stucco, roof, doors and it will maintain character to find features identified in the registration nomination registration, such as plaster details and woodwork. Maintenance work is estimated to cost 31,000 per year. The Property Owner will receive an estimated property tax savings of 66,974 at 331. 2 reduction from factorbased year value. 64 pace patomic street is a contributing building to article 0, debose Park District and a twostory overgarage singlefamily dwelling built in 1899. Theres restoration of front stairs, front door and garage door replacement and the rehabilitation work is estimated a 360,000 over ten years and the proposed Maintenance Plan including annual inspection of roof, gutters, downspout and trim and Maintenance Work estimated 4,000 annually. The Property Owner will receive an estimated prompt tax savings of 22,679 or a 76. 47 reduction from factorbased year value. 2168 Market Street is a threestory wood frame commercial building constructed in 107 by master architect august nordon in the arts and crafts style. This swedish american hall is marked 267. In 2015, the applicant performed a fullbuilding rehabilitation including seismic strengthening and the proposed Rehabilitation Plan includes repair and restoration work to the exterior front and replacement of a nonhistoric door with a new compatible and accessible door at the main entrance, replacing a noncompatible entrance and restoring bricks at the front facade. Rehabilitation work is estimated to cost 95,000 over ten years. The proposed Maintenance Plan includes any necessary repairs to the front facade windows, interior wood elements and roof on a recognize regular basis ans estimated 7 500 annually. The Property Owner is away they will not receive a savings but would like to move forward. Its 2731 to 2735, a threestory woodframe three unit residential building . Article 10, individual landmark number 276 and the subject property was designed in a bozart style by architect james frafrancis dunn. Its contracted at over 3 million and a Structure Report was submitted to demonstrate the granting assumption would assist in the preservation of the property that might otherwise be in danger demolition. It underwent a full rehabilitation by a previous owner including full repainting of all elevations, facade restoration, structural strengthening and reroofing. The proposed Rehabilitation Plan includes dryrot repair of wood elements at the base of the building, restoration of windows and to repaint the exterior, replace roof flashing and full reroof the building. Estimated to cost 305,000. 305,000 over ten years. The proposed Maintenance Plan includes annual inspection of gutters and downspouts, windows, front facade and roof. Maintenance estimated to cost 5,048 annually and the estimated property tax savings is 35,495. A 49. 46 reduction from factorbased year value. This concludes my presentation. Planning staff is here to answer any questions. Also, michael gine from the Recorders Office is here to speak on property tax valuations. Property owners are here to speaanswer any questions you may have. Thank you. Thank you, miss taylor. Actually, were there any other presenters or the other folks are here to answer questions . They are available to present, i think, and each one wanted to speaker. Speak. So we should have the representatives from each of the applicants. Ok. Maybe i could call them up or would you like to help . Sure. Since sally isnt here, we can hear, i believe, sarah for 1401 Howard Street is here. Good morning. Im sarah work and i represent the st. Josephs art society. Its a Cultural Organization dedicated to sporting the arts in our community. St. Josephs art society is compromised of two separate organizations, the art society which is for profit and foundation which is the nonprofit. Both organizations are committed to supporting artists and allowing them to flourish in their careers. We support many 501s in our space and we offer free daily tours to the public. We applied to the mills act because our walls are large and tall, 332 feet, but we take up a small footprint and plan to used funds that we can use longtem for the church. Thank you for your consideration. I have the speaker cards, so adele fang. Good morning, supervisors, im adele fing and im one of the proud coowners of 2731 to 2135 fulsome street. We wanted to announce our appreciate our home, the city and mills act. When we all moved in last year, we started putting aside for typical maintenance items with it wasnt until we started talking to the historic form and alicia turnbaugh that it appeared on our form. They are going to address the wood deterioration and curbed window rehabilitation of the street facing rounded bay, an aged roof including the dome turett around the bay and an overlooked patch growing vegetation due to site drainage. The property tax savings from the contract will help to offset the cost of the repairs and maintenance for a home and we are grateful that San Francisco offers an opportunity for homeowners like us to receive such a financial blessing. So thank you for your consideration. Thank you. Is marty benson or ted olsen here representing 2816 Market Street. My name is ted olsen and im president of the Swedish Society of San Francisco incorporated in 1875 in california, builders and owners of the swedish american hall, San Francisco landmark number 267 located at 2168 Market Street. On behalf of our board and members, i thank supervisor mandelman for sponsoring our nomination and to the staffs of the Planning Department and Assessors Office for supporting or application for mills act nomination. At the time of the 1906 earthquake, my paternallal earthquake, editor of our local swedish newspaper, was secretary of the society at their scandinavia anhall, across from the main to library. The earthquake demolished that city hall and our hall. They hired a master architect august eugene and similarly, marty benson, on our board, with me today, a former afrasier is s the grandson of the contractor, who together with his son and several others built the hall in a year. Other members of our board have similarly distinguished heritages in the society, the board and the hall and i say this because the entire board has restored and renovated the hall and all of us are committed to maintaining and funding this Historic Building to preserve there is center for the scandinavia cultures to provide a contemporary night spot, restaurant and the citys saloon. We provide occasional Historic Sites for the city and we would support your nomination and im here to answer any questions you may have. Thank you so much. And then, next id like to call gustov ligqist. Im here together with my wife and im the owner of 6 63 patomic street. We didnt realize what dire shape this was in. Its in poor shape. This, however, comes at a financial burden for hour family, the costs that we are prepared to take but any tax saves from a mills act contract, it would help to offset these, of course. Regardless of how this goes, i would like to say thank you to michelle and her colleagues have been wonderful to work with during this process and without their help, i dont know how we would have gotten this far. So really appreciate that and thank you very much. Thank you. We could go to Public Comment and are there any members that would like to speak on any of these items . Public comment right now is for items 26 and those being the mills act items that are presently called and there is not a general Public Comment period at any Committee Meetings of the board of supervisors. The next opportunity for general Public Comment is at a fullboard meeting and the full board of supervisors is a special meeting this afternoon but not in this committee. But we will take Public Comments on items 26 right now. Is there anyone that would like to speak on items 26 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And i would like to move we excuse supervisor peskin from this. And can we move these items to the full board with positive recommendation without objection . Great. Mr. Clerk, please call item number 7. Agenda item number 7 is a resolution approving an agreement with a nonprofit othet Owners Association known as the civic to code 36151 for board approval on june 30, 2024. I would like to welcome the Senior Program manager for the economic and work Park Development and hell present on this item. Good morning. Im the Program Manager from the Office Economic and workforce development. Im part of the team overseeing the cbd program. This is a Program Authorizing the renewed and Civic Community district. On july 23rd, 201 2013, the boad of supervisors revised the civic center and they must enter into a Management Agreement with the Owners Association of this district. The document is a template use ford all cbds in the city and adjusted for each cbd. The following language has been added, administrative code 12g prohibits Assessment Fund or any other funds to participate in, support or attempt to influence a Political Campaign for any candidate or ballot measure and campaigning government code 1. 126 which was amended to state board membered of a city contractor may not contribute to any of the elected officials that are acquired to approve the contract, the board of supervisors or mayors, City Attorney or candidates for those offices or committees controlled by such candidates, officials for a 12month period. The 12month period begins once the contract is approved adding language to administrative code 12l which relates to the Public Access to meeting for nonprofit organizations and should be noted that the Community Benefit districts largely abide by these ordinances. The general benefit district for the civic center, cbd is 4. 80 . If approved by the full board, this will get Assessment Funds to the cbd in early january, and we will develop 3. 6 million in the fiscal year. Thank you, mr. Corgus. Anany members of the public that would like to speak on this . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. And can we move this forward to the full board with positive recommendation without objection . Great. Thank you. And mr. Clerk, please call items 8 and 9 together. Agenda item 8 is a resolution approving a memorandum of understanding between the city and county of San Francisco Housing Authority regarding the reorganization of the Housing Authority, ratifying and approving a loan, not to exceed 20 million to the San Francisco Housing Authority and any action taken in connection with such loan, granting General Authority to the mayor and the Mayors Office of housing and community development, to take actions necessary to implement the resolution as defined within it. Agenda item number 9 is a hearing to review the performance audit of the citys assumption of the housing authorities essential function, prepared for the board of supervisors by the budget and legislative analyst. First up, i would like to welcome mr. Campbell from the legislative office to perform on the San Francisco Housing Authority transition. Miss campbell. Good morning. I have a brief presentation on our audit of the citys assumption of the San Francisco Housing Authoritys essential function, but also, ill speak to the resolution before you approving the mou between the city and the Housing Authority and retroactively approving the 20 million loan from the Mayors Office of housing to the Housing Authority. So, our audit scope is to sort of look at the impact of the reported financial shortfall of the Housing Authority in 2018 and do a prospective analysis of the citys assumption of the Housing Authoritys functions and just sort of context the Housing Authority, the two major roles are the oversight of Public Housing and of housing vouchers. Theyre about 12,000 vouchers and half are tenant based in which tenants can use the vouchervouchers to rent in the e market or ones which pay for an actual housing unit. So in context of when the audit started, prior to the audit motion, the Housing Authority reported that up to 30 million shortfall in their Housing Voucher Program and a number of contributing factors that we lay out but one was, in fact, problems in the problems made by the Housing Authority themselves. To the shortfall, there was up to 10 million in funding to become available from hud and another loan from the citys Housing Trust fund up to 20 million and that loan, again, is part of the resolution retroactively approving that loan. So, in march, the hud sent a letter of default to the Housing Authority, basically saying that the Housing Authority was in substantial default in both Public Housing and Housing Voucher Programs. The options available at that time, then, were either for the Housing Authority to be placed into federal receivership or for the city to assume the essential functions of the Housing Authority and then for those functions to be contracted out to third parties. And there was a preliminary mou between the city and Housing Authority in april of this year and then, what was submitted to the board of supervisors in july is the mou before you now. How, there were changes between that july date and what youre seeing today and well talk about those. So we identified three major risk areas in this audit. One was the risk of an ongoing shortfall in the Housing Voucher Program and theres a structural deficit in hud Funding Program so each Housing Authority, because of this subshort fall, especially in a place like San Francisco where theorizing quickly. Theyre rising quickly. They indicated there would be sufficient funding to cover this but this is a future ongoing risk. With the second area of risk was the seventh package in the mou before you and it provides for the city to collaborate on a severance package for the edges who wilemployees who will be ted as they are contracted out and the city takes oversight. We estimated that based on 194 employees in may, and about more than 40 of those who were lookterm employed, the cost of the package could be up to 5 million and now in our discussions at that time with the Housing Authority, our understanding was there potentially were sufficient reserves to pay this, but it was not absolutely clear. So that is definitely a risk area. The third risk area is a pension liability, which at the time of the audit was and the retiring Health Benefits estimated at 61 million. Again the projection showed through 2023 that there would be sufficient payment in each year to pay down that liability to about 40 million. After 2023, it was uncertain how that liability would be paid down and our discussions at that time with the Housing Authority, there was an assumption there would be sufficient residual receipts to pay down that liability but it is an ongoing risk for the Housing Authority. So in terms of our report, we made 16 recommendations and some of these pertain to the mou thats before you today. Although none of them would in any way impact your approval of the mou in this meeting. So of the 16 recommendations, we heard from the mayors housing who will be responding to the audit and agreed with the 12 of the recommendations or qualifications and disagreed with four and well go through the four disagreements. It would be transparent about what the status of funding was and then for early reporting to the board, possible vouchers shortfalls in the Housing Voucher Program and one of the things thats important here is that because theres assumption that the funding for the formula can lead to shotfalls, there is supplemental funding from hud but the Housing Authority has to apply in sufficient time to get that money and it will be important Going Forward that the board is ware an is aware and tg authority is applying to get the funding because lots of people are applying for them. We recommended an annual midyear report on Housing Authority activities. December sort of ends the year they look at their voucher activity and their other activities and we think it would be important for continued reporting and then annual reporting on the unfunded pension in liabilities. And the other major area of recommendations on severance payments that are covered by the mou thats before you today and one was for evaluating whether they had sufficient reserves at this point to meet up to 5 million payment and then consult with hud to consult they could be use ford thi used for e and if necessary, to identify other Funding Sources for the severance payments. The mou covers the will and executive management saying the city will provide executive management to the Housing Authority to a Services Agreement and that the mayor will appoint an executive director for the Housing Authority, who will report to the mayor, the mayors texa dese and they have not had a permanent director since 2013. The person in that role has been in acting position and not a permanently acting director and Going Forward, there would be a Permanent Appointment as a priority. And then the other, the Housing Authority will retain some core staff to oversee the thirdparty contracts in the time of the audit. So when you think of the thirdparty contracts almost all of Public Housing has already been contracted through agreements with private Property Owners, nonProperty Owners and hope 6, hope sf, those have all been transferred to private providers and that will continue with all of the Housing Authority property. For the other contracts at management, its housin we thins important that the contract oversight be competent in that we wanted to make sure that would continue. Other major areas of operations is to think about if theres a shortfall in the housing assistant payment to hud or if theres a reductio reduck reduce part of the financial projections. These are the joint reports from the controller, the mayors Budget Office and budget and legislative analyst. And that joint report looks at general fund revenues, but to the extent the city is, like, looking at whether theyll backfill any shortfalls and funding, we think that needs to be considered as part of that process. In the mou, it talks about the nonhousing or the Housing Authoritys nonhousing stock and it provides for an inventory of that stock. One of the key pieces of property that the Housing Authority owns that the city needs to evaluate its own purposes is 1815 egbert street which is the housing administratives office and the city spent many millions of dollars putting up housing across the street and we think this needs to be considered of the inventory. And i want to say another thing about how property is looked at in this. We were assured that any developer, any party to the Development Agreement who bids would be in arms length in the rfp process and we just wanted to see who bid, what the bidding process is and how it was awarded and how the price was set. The mou does not actually provide for appraisals of Properties Sold for market rate housing. And i think thats a significant issue for us. So there were areas of where the recommendations and the audit were not agreed with. And ill go over them and one was our recommendation that we believe that budget contracting, property transitions should conform with the charter and the administrative code and at the time of the audit, basically what was said, no, this is under huds jurisdiction, not the board. However, i would say that between july, when we got the original mou and today, there have been revisions which we think go a long way towards addressing this recommendation and it does clarify more what the boards role will be in the process and brings forward, at least for review, if not for approval major contracts and major provisions, you know, that meet the charter and admin threshold. We think even though there was a disagreement in the audit itself, that the mou does go a long way toward addressing this recommendation and there still are limitations but that has a lot to do with huds own ligses limitations and what theyre willing to agree to. We have another one that ill send to john givner at the moment and was another recommendation in mou. The mou provides for the structure of the housing commission, a Housing Authority commission and it allows for, under state law, only the mayor can appoint the commission. The mou provides for the mayor to appoint four members and for the board to recommend three members to be appointed by the mayor and its consistent with state law. Now i want to point out this is state law so if there is a change in the structure of the commission, they could, in fact, also advocate for changes at the state level. And our recommendation, though, is that the admin could co codiy since this structure since it was recommended through the mo but ill turn this over to mr. Givner. Im City Attorney, john givner. So the state law restricts how the city can appoint members of the Housing Authority. Under the mou, the proposed plan is for the mayor to appoint the members of the Housing Authority and the mayor has committed in a letter that she submitted to the file this week and in the mou itself, that she will follow the recommendations of the board for certain members of the commission. That provision in the letter and the mou are not going to be legally binding if a future mayor concludes that he or she wants to appoint a member to those seats on the Housing Authority that are inconsistent with the recommendations of the board. The mayor will retain that discretion under state law, unless, as miss campbell suggests, state law is chappinged to give the board of supervisors appointment authority. Thank you for that clarification. So i had a question. So, then, would the adopting the mou with the proposed restructure itself be a violation of state law . No, administer the mou, the mayor retains discretion to make the appointments and the mayor remains the appointing authority, but the mayor is essentially making a commitment in the mou and letter to follow the boards recommendation for those three seats. The final area of disagreement where we maintain our recommendations is over the question of Financial Management. Again, we dont think theres anything in our recommendations that are inconsistent with the mou language before you today. And one of the provisions of the mou is on Financial Management which stated, to the extent that required by the city, the Financial Management will be outsourced to a thirdparty contractor. And that it clarifies that the current bdo is the contractor providing Financial Management. Four recommendation is after the transition, we believe that Financial Management should be brought inhouse. We dont believe it should continue to be a contracted function. The same way that other executive management and executive director are specified as being city responsibilities to a shared Services Agreement with the Housing Authority. We did actually, during the source of this audit i think theres a concern that the Housing Authority has not had sufficient Financial Capacity for a good many years now. Certainly going back to our audit of 2013, are we identified it as a problem. But we did talk to a local representative from hud and its our belief that a competent financial manager can learn the hud ways of doing things, that the city has other financial managers who deal with complex systems and complex regulations and that we think its important for this function to be brought inhouse. And we think that the mou is consistent with that. We dont think mou before you inconsistent. The other two years of disagreement was under the transitioning of the citys Financial System and the authority of the controller. I think in our discussions with various staff theres some capacity there. And i also wanted to say that specifically, the mou states that the Housing Authority will transition to a sharedservices model in which there are Services Including information technology, human resources, purchasing real estate, Financial Systems and oversight and that there will be a process where they will begin to develop integration of these systems, processes and practises. So we think our recommendations are actually entirely consistent at this point with the language in the mou. So overall, that does summarize our report. And we did receive a lot of assistance from the staff and managers about the Housing Authority and the Mayors Office of housing and we want to thank them for the help they gave us. I want to also thank bdo, the financial consultant, really provided a lot of information. Poand were available for any questions. Thank you, miss campbell. Supervisor brown, any questions . No. So next up, we have tonya ledijs from the Mayors Office of housing who will present on the transition mou. Thank you so much, supervisors. Very pleased to be here and i do want to recognise tonya. You may know her as the city auditor but appointed by the mayor to lead the transition of the Housing Authority so happy to be here. I want to thank miss campbell and her team for the excellent work in review and collaboration on their performance audit. I will keep my comments brief, as miss campbell did a good job of summarizing the key issues. What brings us here is a set of financial and operational challenges experienced by the Housing Authority and on the housing choice voucher administration. There were operating budget deficits on the Public Housing side, projected in the upcoming years and a very acute, shortfall in the housing choice voucher that necessitated an emergency loan from our office to the Housing Authority to cover that shortfall and ensure that landlords got paid and vulnerable residents maintain their tenancy. As a result of this mismanagement, hud issued a default letter and i think youre familiar with that in which they found the Housing Authority in default under both main programs and in order to cure that default, it required two things. Firstly required that this outsource operations of the two main programs to thirdparty experts and thats well underway now. They have secured a housing choice voucher administrator and this is under the administrators purview and were preparing in collaboration an rfp to manage the Property Management at the housing site. There are federal regulations which must be adhered to, and those comments have been added to the most recent version of the mou that is in your file. And there are, also, based on those comments to the resolution and i understand that will be provided subsequently. And i do want to although we come to this meeting through times of really financial challenges, i do want to frame this next step as an extension of the Ongoing Partnership that our office has had with the Housing Authority over the past decade and more. Really beginning with hope and assess and the transition of the theyre finishing up all Affordable Housing and at sunnydale and petrr araro, we finished large revitalization efforts. And weve been engaged in the transition of the balance of the portfolio, 3500 units, from Public Housing to voucher supported, nonprofit owned and managed housing under the rental assistance demonstration project and that, with the 100 Million Investment from the city weve averaged over 2 billion of investments that have really provided much Better Living conditions for many of the most vulnerable households. And this gives an opportunity to strengthen the collaboration, coordinate operations and continue to support nearly 14,000 residents that depend on the Housing Authority. So not to be too redundant but what does mou do . It exists as a separate Legal Organization and we discussed the appointment structure of the new Housing Authority board of commissioners. The key, i think, component whereby the city assumes essential functions is really in the appointment by the city of the ceo and the executive staff at the Housing Authority and to ensure that the reporting structure really comes up through the city and that, again, that relationship will be established through a Services Agreement between the city and the Housing Authority. And i stated earlier, outsources that the voucher and Public Housing operations is in the mou and fourth and finally, the authority will submit an annual budget for review by the mayor and board of sou supervisors eah year and that will include contracts to exceed 10 million ten years or generate more than 1 million in revenue. Please note that the funds for the Housing Authority come exclusively from hud and those have richar rigid requirements. It does retain authority under city charter to amend and adopt any proposed allocation of city funds to support the authority and to authorize city staff positions assigned to support the authoritys operations. So, with that summary, unless there are any questions, i would like to turn it over to my colleague, to tonya, who will address the report. please stand by . My fear is that theyre going t. And thats a fear that and i. And i understand their frustrat. The Management Companies. But they are more of like a mac. These Management Companies are e before the Housing Authority had people could call this person, d help, but the management companm havent dealt with things like. Or if they have, they are dealiy than we would normally deal wit. Lets get resources in there. Im wondering is there funding e working with the other departmep these Management Companies deall need of that transition. And spending all the money we dw coming back down because of beh. Well, i think that its a ime funding support and continue tor services and engagement and hou. I think what you are pointing oe that funding and infrastructure. So we have staff that are assigd ensure that Resident Services as we respond, we coordinate with e complaints. So i think your comments and quo action that we need to make thae significant. But there is that concept and i. And i think we just need to gros sustainable. We are committed to having thesd of status of disrepair and negle Housing Authority in large measc underfunding by the federal gov. So what we have done with this r sustainability over the longteg the operations doesnt deviate. So i appreciate your comment. Because before, the housing. I mean, it was a separate entit. It wasnt really part of the ci. And to have to deal and ive der many, many years, we have to kno get things down. Now that its under the city umy question is are question do t of Public Health . Do we have point people at hsa , weve got someone that has mente hoarding or throwing trash out g with rats again, we need someond of watching the management comp. And i totally get why. But they start to maneuver likee resources in from the city to s. So my question is are we connec . Do we have a coalition from thet they are under our city family t resources are available to these to go in . We do coordinate with sister. And our staff does reach out toa coordinated response. We also have extremely low evic. So we are committed to housing. Theres always a balance of ensl the residents. So if residents pose any risk tn proceedings for those residents. But there is a robust response g stabilization. I think we are midtransition hy really becoming part of the cit. And that provides great opportuu are raising, again, i think is l cases . It almost certainly is not. And this is, i would say, per my really to make our support infre coordinated. So i take with great appreciati. And i just want to say when u brought in cultural confident pu brought people into compliance r anything else or People Living e and people were afraid to come. So you brought in people, a loto work that cultural confidence au come forward and you are on youe of your grandkids and daughter t matter, we will help you. It doesnt mean you will be evir the history of the housing auth. And especially when theres anya Housing Development and or rennt asked that. I mean, that is the history of. So people have fear of that. But i think you all did a realle from the neighborhood to do that doesnt matter whats happening. Let us help you get to a point d come back. So now that we are at that poiny fear is the management companiee sure they have those cultural cy resources to make sure that onc, believe me, if someone is throwd they absolutely will not complya trash bin and the rats are comis and here we are hundreds of thoe supposed to be putting in to doo get evicted. I mean that is so there is sh piece of why thats happening. So thats where i just really wt we have those resources in place cultural confidence resources tn and talk to them and they would. I think those are great comml move forward with those. Thank you. Thank you. [off mic] good morning. My name is tanya, transition le. I would like to thank ms. Campbe done as well as dan and his tea. Id like to just quickly touch n
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.