comparemela.com


To revist this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.
By the end of last year, there were few better symbols of bad-faith politics than Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the law that gives online platforms legal immunity for user-generated content. After a fairly sleepy existence since its passage in 1996, Section 230 turned into an unlikely rallying cry for a subset of Republican politicians who disingenuously blamed it for letting social media platforms discriminate against conservatives. (In fact, the law has nothing to do with partisan balance, and if anything allows platforms to keep more right-wing content up than they otherwise would.) Down the home stretch of his reelection campaign, Donald Trump began dropping Section 230 references into his stump speeches. The whole thing culminated with a pair of depressing Senatehearings that, while nominally about Section 230, were little more than PR stunts designed for Ted Cruz to get clips of himself berating Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. Senate Democrats didn’t quite cover themselves in glory either.

Related Keywords

Wisconsin ,United States ,Donald Trump ,Jack Dorsey ,Mark Warner ,Mazie Hirono ,Amy Klobuchar ,Ted Cruz ,Youtube ,Wisconsin Supreme Court ,Senate Democrats ,Communications Decency ,Facebook ,Communications Decency Act ,Democratic Senators Mark Warner ,விஸ்கான்சின் ,ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் ,டொனால்ட் துருப்பு ,பலா டோர்ஸி ,குறி எச்சரிக்கை ,மாஜிே ஹீறோனோ ,ஆமி கிலொபூச்சர் ,டெட் குரூஸ் ,வலைஒளி ,விஸ்கான்சின் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,செனட் ஜனநாயகவாதிகள் ,முகநூல் ,ஜனநாயக செனட்டர்கள் குறி எச்சரிக்கை ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.