there was an american citizen involved. you are right, also, of course, you have studied this as much as anyone, but the court did resolve the case very quickly, and the opinion, i have spent many an hour trying to decipher certain pracaragraphs for cases have had. it's not easy. the court, to its credit, give a little credit, did have an eight-hour oral argument. i read the transcript of that to try to figure out what was going on in the opinion that did not unlock the box completely for me on what was going on in the kieran opinion. your point, justice scalia said it was not the court's finest hour. it was a rush. it was a rush. and rushes, sometimes the court has to rush, but rush decisions in a judicial context sometimes aren't always the best. >> on that point, would you be open to the idea of bringing back the era of the eight-hour