impactioning timpacting the most? >> this will make it more difficult for law enforcement to be able to on abtain what we wo call noncontent information, location information, other types of information about cell phone use that does not include content. to date, that sort of information, those records have been relatively easy for law enforcement to obtain because a warrant was not required. with this decision, a warrant will be required in more cases than currently is. >> greg, thank you much for that. i want to bring in jolene kent because some folks who are watching this of course involve these tech companies that work with cell phones and use these cell phones and explain a little bit more about lie this matters more broadly. >> well, this certainly is going to be a signal to the tech community when it comes to data collection in general. this specific case decided by the supreme court, of course, deals with location data as it relates to cell phone providers. but, of course, in the case of san bernardino and other major
Related Keywords
Information , Types , Law Enforcement , Location Information , Noncontent Information , Cell Phone Use , Impactioning Timpacting , Cases , Decision , Warrant , Records , Content , Course , Folks , Cell Phones , Work , Tech Companies , Greg , Lie , Jolene Kent , Supreme Court , Case , General , Data Collection , Deals , Location Data , Cell Phone Providers , Signal , San Bernardino ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.