something was up. >> and publicly tweeted about it. the other question then would be this question of asking the court to seal the information. we already now know about these other four women. what do you make of that request to seal the information about these two women? >> the judge was like you want to give me some law? because it's not attorney-client privilege because cohen wasn't representing any of these people. what gleason is saying is that these women have privacy issues. that's not a legal claim. so the judge says the letter's fine, even though you did misspell schneiderman, but put some law on this because the judge doesn't know what to do. >> the question would be then given the fact that we do have a record of michael cohen being the go-between to pay women in certain cases, because this is now connected to the cohen case, could these women's identity be discoverable? would it be relevant in any way since cohen is now involved? >> so collusion collision. this is like way messy because
Related Keywords
Women , Question , Information , Court , Something , Judge , Request , Four , Two , People , Attorney Client Privilege , Law , Privacy Issues , Saying , Wasn T , What Gleason , Claim , Fact , Letter , Fine , Doesn T , Misspell Schneiderman , Michael Cohen , Case , Way , Cases , Record , Collusion Collision , Identity , The Go Between ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.