under the exclusionary rule and the fruit of the poisonous tree, you cannot get the benefit of that evidence and yew it in course against me. this is one of the classics that all law students learn, is the rule about who can consent to a search of the premises, right? if someone's 3-year-old child comes to the door and it's fbi agents, can the child say come on in and search mommy and daddy's home? probably not -- >> what about an employ aye of a storage locker unit? >> that would be what we would call a fact intensive inquiry. as a categorical rule, it would by difficult to fashion a broad rule for anyone who is an employee that where they have documents -- a doorman in an apavement building may give permission to hang in the lobby, but they don't always have permission to let you in the apartment. while they may have and the power, not everybody has legal
Related Keywords
It , One , Rule , Course , Benefit , Yew , Tree , Evidence , Fruit , Classics , Law Students , Someone , Child , Fbi , Search , Door , Say , Agents , Premises , Mommy , Employ Aye , Daddys Home , 3 , Fact , Anyone , Employee , Inquiry , Storage Locker Unit , Everybody , Documents , Power , Permission , Lobby , Doorman , Apartment , Apavement Building ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.