hillary clinton investigation. she left ochs of secretary of state in 2013. not in office all that time. the idea of reopening an investigation on her 230ufounda, source came from a book written by steve bannon's partner that landed in the "new york times" fum of fictions about hillary clinton and conspiracy theories. can you foresee a circumstance where it's valid to go back and investigation her based on that? >> well, you know, there's a stcht statute of limitations. five years for most crimes. anything done criminally has likely run anyway. congress has oversight of the fbi. it's not inherently problematic for congress to ask in an oversight rule for something to be reviewed. i put trust in the career people of the fbi to have done the investigation first the right time and those who revieweds it, look, did it by the book the first time. nothing changed. review it per somebody's request but nothing changes here.