relating to potential treatment for his condition. the evidence came from researchers at the vatican's children's hospital and another facility outside britain. now, the reason this case has gone back and forth in the courts is that charlie's doctors in the uk had said his condition was incurable and that his quality of life was poor. they said under these circumstances they didn't want to prolong his life and potential suffering. they went to court initially, because they couldn't come to an agreement with charlie's parents to turn off his life support machines. now the hospital is saying it's correct to explore the evidence for experimental treatments. so it's been going back and forth. meanwhile, charlie's parents face another agonizing interval until a decision is made as to whether their baby can go to america for treatment, if he can be treated here in london, because there was talk if they got fda approval, the experimental drugs could be brought to the hospital here in england and administered. or possibly face having to turn off their child's life support

Related Keywords

Evidence , Treatment , Forth , Case , Doctors , Charlie Gard , Condition , Reason , Courts , Researchers , Childrens Hospital , British , Facility Outside Britain , Vatican , Life , Parents , Quality , Circumstances , Suffering , Agreement , Decision , Hospital , Baby , Interval , Treatments , Life Support Machines , Talk , London , America For Treatment , Child , Drugs , England , Life Support System , Approval , Fda ,