telling everyone within government over that period and next eight weeks that the united states was under attack, precisely as i said it. so you know, it's not, you know, prophesizing the future. it's just sheer professional intelligence analysis as carried out by the professionals, but the consumers refuse to believe it. >> that's the important point the consumers particularly in the trump campaign. navid the interesting thing that happened, we had this discussion and going back to you and i, this is the conversation we keep on having, which is at what point does the trump campaign become aware and knowledgeable of what russia is doing or convinced it's happening and what do they do about it? do they believe it? do they believe it and try to take advantage of it? these two stories in the "wall street journal" and another piece by matt tate, first the "wall street journal" story "investigators have examined reports from intelligence agencies that describe russian hackers discussing how to obtain emails from mrs. clinton's server, and then transmit them