later has to choose between what's good for the country and his family. the security clearance, the other obligations mean that ultimately, she is trying to be like a formal federal employee and meet the standards, but unlikely to be treated or fired like one. we she can't be promoted into the cabinet or anything like that. the 1967 nepotism law forbids that. there is this loophole legally as an adviser. >> when she announced last week she was going to be an informal adviser and was in the process of getting security clearance, experts said the move wasn't good because it'd allow her to avoid financial disclosure rules. she said, i have heard the concerns some have with my advising the president in my personal capacity while voluntarily complying with rules. i'll be an unpaid employee, subject to the same rules as other federal employees. what does that mean for a practical matter? what financial information will she have to turn over, and will