he implies to the "wall street journal" in this story today that he is telling the story about michael flynn now because he was very disturbed by this meeting at the time when he went to it back in september. but if he was disturbed by it on september 19, why did he stay on the trump campaign and then on the trump transition until january? and what has changed in his thinking about michael flynn and what might come to be known about this period in american politics that has suddenly made him decide to come forward now and declare himself to have not been part of that kidnapping discussion at all. we asked director woolsey to please come on this show tonight to discuss with us what happened there exactly, whether it was michael flynn's kidnapping plan that was being discussed or the turkish government's kidnapping plan and michael flynn was helping them work out the details or maybe even trying to talk them out of it. i would love to also love to hear director woolsey's change of heart that this is a matter that should be in the open after he sat on it for sixth months