showed an accused rapist specifically preyed on women when he knew they were in a weakened or compromised state. that involved some really ugly allegations of a rapist who preyed on a woman after she had a blood transfusion, was weakened, and basically, the judges said that while we don't usually allow this other evidence, here it goes to your method, your pattern. the only other case i'll show you goes a little bit of different direction. commonwealth v. mason, a judge allowed an incident of that a defendant preyed on his two teenage nieced, but refused to admit accusations that he also preyed on a older forest sister. look, we can all agree that if true, preying on this other person is a terrible crime. what they're going to say is that judge didn't allow that kind of evidence in, because it wasn't the issue the jury was supposed to decide. and i can tell you, as you know, in sex crimes cases, these are big battles, because we also see women accusers consistently denigrated and impugned when they come forward.