alluding to. there's no mention of the geneva convention, and respect for international humanitarian law. these are the things that allow my organization to work in conflict zones around the world. and we still have a lot of questions as to whether or not those rules still apply in this case, in the case where a hospital existed for four years. we shared the gps accord nats. we had really demonstrated that it was a working civilian hospital. yet it was still struck. and i think that's quite shocking to everyone. >> i want to ask you about this, because in the initial days of the strike, your organization head called this a war crime in previous statements, but today it was called gross negligence on the part of u.s. forces but didn't mention a potential war crime. is there reason for that? >> i think it's important to know that there are two thresholds that can be crossed for something to constitute a war crime or a grave breach of international humanitarian law. one is intent and the other is
Related Keywords
Lot , World , Things , Questions , Mention , International Humanitarian Law , Rules , Conflict , Respect , Organization , Producer , Geneva Convention , Case , Working Civilian Hospital , Everyone , Accord Nats , Gps , Four , Part , Head , Forces , America , Strike , Statements , War Crime , Didn T , Gross Negligence , Something , One , Reason , Breach , Thresholds , Two ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.