be compensated for that, not the same thing as playing a sport. >> answer that question for us. has there been a distinction made in the courtroom in the actual arguments about the difference between being paid to play for the sport versus the use of the likeness of these athletes? >> yes, actually, that's one of the interesting things about this case is that this specific case is more about sort of main image and likeness and the attorneys, again, they've gone to the judge and said, look, a lot of sort of possible ways to resolve this. we're asking for an injunction so the athletes can get something. they said if you want, you can have a trust fund that the players could then, you know, access that money after their eligibility is required. there's different solutions. if the ncaa wants to hold on to some sort of partial definition of amateurism. the interesting thing to note here, there are other anti-trust cases coming and going to be heard under the same judge and much more direct challenges to the whole that i said maximum wage, you know, earnings cap that the scholarship