way to screen these groups. then it brings up your question. what gave you the idea these criteria that you applied were appropriate. i don't see this -- going through this report i haven't seen any justification for why they chose those criteria. they said statistically that ended up meaning one-third of all the groups they screened had the words tea party or patriots in the name. which is a lot. but i'd like to see why they didn't choose groups with progressive in the title. or any other delineation that would have made it more balanced. >> here's some good news for the white house. even in our first edition tonight we were talking about the possibility, purely the possibility that there might be some white house involvement or campaign involvement where somebody in the obama administration might have said, you know, we ought to look at these tea party people. they're raising a ton of money. maybe they're doing it illegally and getting involved in campaigning. according to this ig report that didn't happen. >> right. this is all internal. again, if i were a member of congress and i want to -- i'd sit there and say, you know