obsol relevance the middle these nucl preventi weap posit cen r >> an awkwardly rea points f you t a it const are speaki that by reducing the siz nuclear a bad 5,000 who are th > about th >> yeah. >> and some of them clearly did senator k defender o but he knew what he was talking about an nuclear pol sen defense contractors. they wan the they want to keep the contracts. some of t score attack naive and dangerou tr suggested. but many of them are just it's nu decreasing relevance to the thre but here you threat. so when th chuck ha que think nuclear we we need, ca to t display today. >> in terms of how they fit in to broader conservative politics on this, isn't it true that more sort of establishment leading lights of republican foreign policy are much closer to chuck hagel on this? they've tried to make global zero into some communist thing, but aren't there a lot of big-name republicans associated with that? >> absolutely. so outside the senate, when you go and you look at particularly former republican officials on this, colin powell, completely with this agenda, george schultz completely with this agenda, henry kissinger has joined schultz and former secretary bill perry and sam nunn, two democrats, in leading the charge for a world free of nuclear weapons. part of the inspiration for president obama's strategy.